The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

‘. cowmmw-aniiis i 'nu'u'li ‘ '- â€"' ‘ t , , mlâ€"nmflm'slimrmmuIIIIIIIIP‘ } III-II TF0” an. II!- _ II t Item-mum a“ -r. P- l ; «fin-mam S ‘ LE. I“ “Awâ€"44 nil ‘ “Tum ‘\ “ ’- é a; E 5.: Â¥ I ' I ‘- ' = l 1/: ‘ . , . ‘ 4 n. O ; '. .Q I I I 5 new” ' §l‘ 4 “ 3" " i ‘ p. , . swam-m“ .- l ... w .; : 1 2mm” II-I Ell ' : ‘ I - u- }! 3‘ , Qua-II . Elli-so.” "”l . ; 3” pm on". SPRAY PAINT i ~‘ 3 ~ lav-'5']; : " ' - ’- ‘1 .~â€" “ HF . WAXEB MUSE]!!! 4" an“ m ‘- ~’ '3 j . , The city has awarded the constmction tender for its streetxape redesign for a large section at i I” the Northdale neighbourhood, which will be broken into two phases â€" Phase 1 (black) and { ~ . Phase 2 (grey dots). in mom i ale-In. l ' “W ' City awards Northdale * but: - I e I : mm streetscape tender l l ‘ WWW The city use: a two-stage The first includes develop- } ~ 5‘ 99 s % Chronicle” process to determine win- ing a streetscape master 1 Z ning bids for city work. The plan and environmental i . to Tie City ofWaterloo opted first is an analysis of the assessment for the entire ; not to award a construc- technical submission. Northdale neighbourhood. L tion tender to a local firm that meaning the proposed work minus KingStreet. Columbia L 2“, PC "m 1” PACK cal washout $200,000 cheaper methodology. previous Street. Phillip Street and ; dun others due to a concern experience and a workplan University Avenue. as well as A.” KIT ”VI, PAPER dielowestbiddidrmtcontain for the project. That is a tmlficanalysis. streetscape l sums enough work hours to com- weighted 65 per cent conceptual design. drainage, I pletetheproject. towards the city's final deci- tree management. lighting { Of the four bids the city sion. and the feasibility of burying i received for the reconstnic- hydro and other telecom» ' ‘ tion of Hickory Street and " e munications Spruce Street in the Nonh- [can tellyou ”1 The second pan includes 1“ dale neighbourhood, Wal» approaCh we use detailed engineering design ' 3 _ ‘ ‘ terFedy submitted a bid of ' ’ for Phase I (Spruce Street f; i i / $695.87.! â€" significantly ISC'ONSlStent from Columbia Street to waif-5 * . " lower than the $887,022 bid With Other Hickory Street and Hickory .. submitted by winner [Bl ‘ ' I ' ' Street from King Street to ‘ 8 Group. munlC‘pa 'Inesnlfl Hazel Street) and Phase 2 ' 99 s‘ 49 The other two bids. from the promnce. (Hickory Street from Hazel MTE Consultants and MMM 4 Ron Dim-on. dim-tor ot Street to [ester Street). ' ~ Group. came in at around "‘an m The third part of the prop . 5890.000 and 3897.000 I ” on is the actual construction TACKY on respectively (M [he run "In prnrnt ”f Phase I I "'6“ spm (Lounci| approved the ”I, “w “mm",a‘w" t)rmson said there is an : cm GLUE winning bid last week along (.nmmwmn but. element «it ”buyer beware“ ‘ mm“ “m with $375,000 in funding to whenever the city tenders i complete the project. to go work to outside constmction L ‘ ‘ 4 (I 5 ‘ ' ‘ along Wllh S38l.000 The second stage is an firmsand the two-stage sub l m u approved In lanuary and analysis of the proposed mission process is a way for E . ”66.000 in funding allocat- cost, including hourly rates the City to exercise its due m M - ed to the protect last Decemr of «attend the total number diligence to ensure the work ; â€" her. of hours proposed. is done on llmt‘ and on V If “M Ron ()rmson. director 0! 'l can tell you the schedule. / engineering servtces. said approach we use is consis- kay a.“ M V there's more to selecting a tent with other municipalir Bid 3 - . . . . _ . . [total inciudmg HST) \ W ‘44“ Winning bid than rust the ties in the province. said . .a.‘ =.â€".; ‘80 X 8 LII: price, and stall didn't believe ()rmson i h..- -â€"- u the plan submitted by Walr The city did not prrmde [3| qumenerl _" _" ‘ 99 570 X 8 Lac ‘64 terFedy contained enough the bidding companies with mien “ hourstoflnishthepoh. an outline of how many I ~ Dimson said the city hours staff believed ll would ”(m- m X 12 Lac .84 couldn‘t divulge how many take to complete the work. “190,289 hours each bidder submit- but they did provide a ‘ ‘ “I. n I. m no “u" “an H ted but said the winning bid schedule of comrmction the MM (in. than “M lâ€"IMTI.‘ MHHM‘M was If?!" than 6.500 iota: :ityf’ 133d lifithe dTWle' $897.48! I I I I I I I wor ours rmson sa- 0 o ,wr cons nic ion l . --.- â€"â€"-‘~ . â€"â€"-- . the city expected to provide heg‘nning in 2017 W n ' MW each bidder with a dehriel The project will he bro $535,371 [ . this week. ken down into three parts i i l I ' _