The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

‘ 3-WAi‘iiRmmm-Mma,mio City increases spending threshold Bid/mas [Anson ' process. The majority of the capi~ he's noticed in recent years. In Janâ€" "va . Chroniclesmfl ta] budget spending is made up of uary 2013, council gave final 9- ‘ projects valued at more than approval authority on sign variv .â€" a?“ city councillor is criticizing $200,000, she noted. ance applications to a variance *, a decision to double the “Council will still approve 90 committee, with council acting as 3m . ‘" threshold necessary for per cent of the dollars spent," she an appeal body . - 4‘5 final council approval of capital said in an interviewlast week last February. council also deli v budget spending items, a move The 20M capital budget includ- egated the authority to review and staff say has been tnade to ed l53 projects, valued at nearly approve demolition control applir improve efficiencies at city hall. $51 million. of those, more than cations to staff and in November, On May 12, council agreed to half of the projects (80) were less council removed a requirement of increase the threshold from than “00,000, for a total of $2.8 staff to provide quarterly updates $100,000 to $200,000. The corpo- million. Another 20 projects were to council and requested that rate management team will now valued between $100,000 and information be provided to indi have final approval on all capital $200,000, fora total of$2.l million. vidual ward councillors instead. works spending between $50,000 The remaining 53 projects, or Coun. Karen Scian, chair of the and $200,000 already approved by about 34 per cent of the all proj» finance and strategic planning council duringthebudget process. ects, were valued at more than committee, said she can under The change means council will $200,000 for a total of $45.9 mil- stand Whaley's concerns but said not get a second chance to weigh lion, or90 per cent of total budget. the $200,000 threshold is a good in on capital budget projects val- In 2013, 35 per cent of the 134 compromise. . \ ued at less than $200,000, and capital budget projects were worth "There are enough checks and according to Conn. Mark Whaley, more than $200,000, or about balances along the way (and) we '8 lot of the choices council previ» $67.6 million (9].8 per cent of total see everything that comes forward ously had in open meetings are spending). anyway within the budget prrx'ess lost," he wrote in an email to the Under the new threshold level, itself,” she said. Chronicle last week. department directors have final The staff report also rcorgan ‘ ’ “Democracy works best with approval on projects under ized other budgetary items in divergent views, open accountar “0,000, department commission- Waterloo. bility and sometimes messy out ers have final approval on projects The minimum balance for a ' corvette Summer comes,” he added. between $10,000 and $50,000, and project to be included on the t‘apl' Cassandra Pacey. a financial the corporate management team ial budget has been Increased W M Don id, I a Inerofth 1965 Ch! r let (an E“ St' R analyst with the city, said the move has final say on projects between from $5,000 to ”0,000. and an ”2!: thfphotz, 01:1: with Kim Hagemann aboSt his ride dzrin'gngt’heay was made to increase efficiency $50,000 and $200,000. inflation factor will also be applied Knights of cojumbu‘ Corvette Show in Waterloo on Saturday. The Knights and councillors still have approval Whaley said the transfer of to the council approval threshold, or (01.1mm alsohosts a cruise "by“ every Friday. over every capital budget item decision making to ‘unelected which WI“ he added in 338000 through the annual budget staff" has been a troubling trend increments. I mklmmm a ; . v l V i; I V. ' ‘ '4 ., ‘~~ 3! N. Suite l7 ‘-» . » ' f4}: - , . V. ‘ , ‘.‘, 4 . ON N213H8 M ‘ A, .1). ’3'." 1‘, w “ aim .. ., - . a.“ I l “H12“ , , , :10-884-4200 - , . .. kitfootxom " j ' Ar Y D' b t' 7 ' ' e, ou '3 .e .IC. . 0 2 . Don t become a statistic!!! ,2 «mimosa atrium « mow me that every 30 moods a limb I: lost due to f z ‘ it up?“ : t r' r m flu was it,” ‘; I, (Aunts (1”? (we at "we most « 0mm m, I I 4‘ 'utl’a’ms it)! rmsrn‘ nitration if Derrida with diabetes Unbetes gar“ COMES 1i ' 1’ ' “no (”i )m()gt‘ 1' in r w than 7r problems resulting Ir. JlCefS and sluw ( 3 ’1? Nu mpg Don’t-I "xyt exomtrwtwns shoutd address footwear skin nails ’ ’ i, ind most P in 4‘ it My Home w warm and carnation in the 990' I '- 1 i E]. El Visit kwtootcom - ‘ ' t lea d “um""'" ° ”W” “may your: 7 2014 «my [9 519-554-4200 a s (/41; (fruity-4‘ //uâ€" k- W 3 '.-. O. I ’.-. I ‘/ l“.‘~’ - n.‘..' 1’ 1"» i . . . . .- I" on: ”I’ll"! "cue AND . ... y X , . < . 3 , on on club-encum- . u. 'aitx," r v ‘,- -- s. .40 ("u ’ ' N t} , . FOR amuse 01-310. , ., "“"""/U"'J' " j I mmunmousumcumiusrnouocoot SMR j I - t, M." .y.....,-.../m../.-r ,, "rm/m/Am/MMW "a” "" " y" '27:. "ff; ' "‘ "'1'”; :3 "' “'3" " M “m ! 5.“ PM «2. ’- . Maputls‘ . _