The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

wxu nu no CHRONICU: - Walnut-my, March 25, 20:4 - a Jud e re 'ects last min u "to in “motion of lo 11 [3me Mount j . n m’hlsticeCAmle'llahlald. For the Chronicle 1 lot Marta maintains that is not t ,1; ‘ l . .3 w , 4 theme. ‘ ight rail transit in Waterloo :51.” ‘ ' mg. n x “in...” ”Rh is not abut my Idf-lnter- Region dodged a bullet last m. ' “399-333;? " , at thh 3 about the 10d people in - week after a judge dismissed if; 5“ our region. That's what l've been a request for a temporary injunc- it" if: maldong' heuid. tion to stop the process 4":‘13‘ ' . in her ruling Tinker questioned “We are pleased we can move whether Aissa had no personal ahead with the project. We felt we 5 ‘ ,‘ interest and why the applicant were on solid ground,” said Region- , 1'1" 5, m ,. ,, waited until the 11th hourto file for a] Chair Ken Selling after the judg- a 1 . , l5“: an injunction. She also questioned ment. “The judge obviously agreed 0’5". .. . " “t ” the intention behind the coalition with us and now we can move on ‘- - ‘ ' which was incorporated just days with the project.” ~â€" before the application was filed. The decision came just one day . ind Wonderedwho it Wm before the region voted 0 award a '11)de he wasn‘t granted the the project horn Mat this Counsel for the report argued . Alan's lawyers explained the $532-million construction comma injunction. Aim said his legal bat- point in time," said James Hermon, that the application should be first coalition represents 3.000 Waterloo ‘ to the preferred consortium. tie withtheregionian'tover. theregion's lawyer. looked at based on merit, saying WW“ . . (3'31!qu ' “We have to do what we have to “They are still entitled to seek a the application m “frivolous, vex~ The Judge had a limited profile Coalition Slop Waterloo LRT do Wedon't ayeewith thedecision declaration that the rapid transit atious and made in bad filth." sim- of the corporation. which drdnl Inc. lead by 18me owner of Jay's and that's why We have a team of project initiative is contrary to the ply to delaythe prolect "flute Ifthey had my new With Fendng in Waterloo. brought for- lawyers to find out what we can do official plan as it currently exists They also said the injunction Wllldl they 00‘“? PC! for the legal Wild In application for In injunc» forthe neatatep.‘ hesaid and they are still entitled to seek a was a 'backhanded attempt” by 0083M”!!! hearing. and the [Home tion. alleging that the region‘s list" Willie the judge did dismiss the declaration (Or a permanent Mesa to get around having land didn'tsayWhether lt was I br‘PfOl- mil transit prom didn‘t conform to request for an interim injunction. injunction. but they arena entitled exproprtated by the region for light It or motor-profit company the region's 0M plan and 56000" she left the door open for a perma- to stop the vote . . . to award the rail transit. 'Thats a W915 problem for the 24 of the Ontario Planning Act. nent one. construction comma.” The judge also questioned the court,” MET satd. ‘ . lt also claimed the W0" didn't “She did not dismiss the entire The decision against the iniunc- application. M118 the "this. the coalition complete a full enVlronmental application, she just dismissed the tion was made on substantive "That's a serious question _ . . “as Ordered to pay for the cost of messment. application that sought to prevent grounds Wmehaasta “10m _ fl 2 e}, 3- 3 . E if ‘34:} ft" flaw “ . W’Vz“ ‘ ”913*”. I?!” - ~“' é: ‘ 34;»: ‘ ‘f '3‘ ‘1‘ , " ' {t we aw. ’ a») (3 «NZ-u z + I}; , . _ '44 t . A ., 3 1?) “5‘: you" '- ,7 ‘ ‘ f 1 “ ‘ o‘ . ' 18 7“ “(3%? l M a 's I!" f. . all. 1;? I will? ‘ , l A . . . “‘39” " “$5 l . «. w - mm My} w ~ “t “it" ' ‘ . ;,_..:'o~:ne.'. a.» it .' I”, = S , ~ S " l; " ' ’ , "'3‘; '5' ‘ ' ‘ tabla 3‘>r 3'» ‘ tam-c; » .',-l,y,'- ‘ ' figif‘“ . “l, ., ‘ 1:44.; y “‘1‘,th .4“. I?“ " ' t . 3 l. ‘9 he 4,, > - ‘ "Tm", “"‘Hd‘ ‘ In 3' s it ’31 N' 3 "“ tarts?“ of: _ ‘ of: . ‘ 1- 1“." A ,. , .1. 1; r: 3 it . ’1. _ ' ,4, mg: """Jb'lf‘fi‘fi‘llfi 4;“; . t . a ‘ is: < wag; M" , ' . . , _ .. ~ , . “v “3.17 u .. urn-".M' . , ,. ._ ._' a ,. ‘ $351? if?" : A; , ,. _ 1 so, “a: w; ..- V . e : fl. a. '44 , , . airwé‘ 2" t. l 4; ,, ‘ t «do: 1‘ 2' ,3” -‘ I. V, V ,4: 3. , -. Z .4" Entry ~~ ‘ PM” gm, 1" . M ,. ,s A '- 3 I}, 31"}: H I 7‘ ”r uh? iaause, L. WV ‘- ‘ ' .. i ”p we. .. -- . " ’ ' ‘ . a 1 “7‘4”” ‘4’. if 31 4‘3. “C M ref-‘3‘? "' c if M .3178" t ' ""5 ‘N lâ€"‘ Fâ€" .3 ~- a». tas’. 3 ”a, new" 7‘ .. ‘ t \‘ i( W V l 4" 3 f l ' t» W b a): J .. V 3 : x 3' .9 , by", .- ‘L a ‘3: 1' not ~~ - . .t vim m t ’ . 2‘» t ' a" ma - . 5 3. , s , ,i a f ,. , . 1 ‘ - ‘ n m . E V , , ,. , sf: , * M I _ m”- if"? g?“ “ 4 “:3 3"“ . WWI. tonne-mane. , b Eye Glasses 0 Sunglasses .. i y, 1 an ., .- one ‘ 5,133,315 ,5, “5,173,,”“M ' ' :-z " -Mon10â€"6- n. in we at» uncut-tum 106 OSoflContactLenses . - u. t. ‘ - «melting; . -nln&FnlM-S‘lM-Sm1?4 var-m Inst OPTICAL "on. m m .013 519-741-1233 519-954-2020