The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

. l l-WATEleCHIONm'W- a. 5.2014 . . o o o o ‘ . , , 2 . . . . . Region ranked top 20 m diversmn "i“ i; y '- i' v i“ l ‘. III 1“ . BYIAMleMIItsON about 47 per cent, up front and 102,163 tonnes was I'I' E Q s ‘ fl“ (.‘hrrlttrf'lfiufiff 46.5 per cent in 201 1 Water diverted. "We've had the phi ‘I Bn‘w loo mirrored that increase. losophy of making incrt- . CA“ ‘ he Region ofWaterloo seeinga rise ofalxnit one per mental improvement, and _ K'w ‘ is pleased with the cent over 201 1. we're seeing that," Howard ‘ 1 latest results of a Between 2007 and 2012. said. l s . , provincial notrforrprol'it total residential diversion She also noted the dill] 7 encfl that ranked Waterloo among rates have grown by near] ' cult in ( nantifviri all of the 4 a I . l Y 1 , K pp'ng "I- . the top 20 tor waste diver eight per cent in Ontario, or trash that is being diverted. L mu“ sho I-I- ~ ,. 2 sion in Ontario in 2012. about 1.6 per cent per year. Websites like Kijiji that allow i 3 U" I'II . ’ in a report released Jan "While there is still much people to sell an old couch . III. ‘ ” s 22. Waste Diversion Ontario work to do. 1 congratulate all rather than take it to the ‘ announced the region was municipalities for helping dump have helped. its have "In" ‘ ranked No. 16 in the province Ontario move in the right e~waste or hazardous waste n VB I ‘ after diverting 52.5 per cent direction at keeping residen return centres. but it makes it . I PC C T ' of residential waste away tial waste out oflandfill,~ said hard for stall to get a good 0 ‘ from landfill. Michael Scott. chief execua grasp on the total numbers. ‘ Guelph came it at No. 1 in tive at WOO, as part of the likewise, since the diver the province, diverting 67.7 report. sion is measured by weight. percentofwaste. Howard said the region municipalities with a lot of "We’re really happy to he doesn’t make diversion tar- plastic or paper in their blue ' in the top 20 for Ontario." gets part ofits waste philoso bins are at a disadvantage " said (Iari Rastas Howard. phy. Stafl'prefer to introduce compared to those with a lot ‘ A V project manager for waste programs like the green bin ofglass. 2 management programs at and blue bin program that “Much of what we're the region. Among similar residents will voluntarily par diverting through our recy \ ' sized municipalities. Water- ticipate in. cling is plastic, so the weight loo Region jumped to third Locally, green bins (Ol' doesn't necessarily reflect the ‘ _ in the province. lected 9.060 tonnes in 2012 amount of space we're sat . ._ .99 The residential waste and 9.521 tonnes in 2011 trig." Howard said "lhar's w m diversion rate is the percent That waste is taken to the niawnly of what we see I MW” 08. m .- age of blue box and other Guelph at a cost of 52.2% mil in the blue box these rims, residential arba 9 re rted lion r ear and re )resents plastic and )a )er" 8 8 P0 99 Y 1 l l ,. mum , ”mm smut to WHO that is kept out of about half the waste council The region is cum-nth 1 7 1' landfill. Reports were due to thought would be diverted exploring options for [urine l T & Nlmm m WDO byApril 19, 20”. Overall, restdents in this waste disposal. including the t in 2012. the overall diver- region threw out 194.529 option to build a rnulri mil ; TILE . fl ,4 , sion rate for Ontario was tonnes of material in 201:, lltm dollar incinerator ' ,. . . a". ,9- ULZT‘“ L ,, . .. SEALANT a. N. Suite n r“ g . mum, "m ON N2} 3H8 J: ‘ t 295 .2â€" 519-884-4200 _ « x $149 “In $399 ’ kwlool.rom ‘5 ‘._' ‘ ... luv” ’ .\ .\\\ 1““ \-‘ m V r s it. 'i'1,'ii'};r/lo,, .. . 99 99 . . «12... 14 ‘9 A d r h I 22 «3'- re you tire o ee pain? . ’ a A . . EmER 8 CM" ‘ l . A , , We offer on unique treatment protocol for hem pair _ CmnoN ‘ . ' 2 2 l "i!- which IS exclusrve to our CllnIC and hos on excellent l v l success rate Q m+ ‘ f 1 Each program 15 tailored according to the pom)” 5 an” . I . , .\ . .. ‘ and it IS specrficoll desr nod to treot one >rever ’ t . ~ 2 ..- nuu .. w J i l y g F - ms ; a the return of the problem We have incorporoteri i * 3 l the latest laser technology in our treatment plans r l “U“ ' ’ ‘" ' order to achieve the best DOSSlble results ‘ ‘5” .m" ‘ ‘ ' a...“ ‘ - :,.;:: VHkMootcom : _ " 1,... [5' I Q q 2. . , -, fl“ . -..~' _ lobanmonorcd 2 j;- . a q 2 . swan-£200 . . r ‘ a. 4 . . . m . ' ‘ --: '- .26on i ‘ . r I". A. "’ f” : k . i .‘ ..1 ,‘g l i .‘ ’W'l'w 1w .(:M(Mlmm .M'leca'm 2 ,. " 7“ . . A” j : emu/”wry . memo” \\‘ ,2 ;, 1;. II, 52.- , 1% I“ ‘ , nMM/MM/m 2 Santa'sFoovCao . i -_ , .2 ‘ ‘ . . ‘ ‘v ' a” ‘ 1‘ ”4‘37” ' ’ gvmWhMmm & More I’ . ‘1” W We" mwnme-mm . .. , x I. “W“ " " ‘ ’mth I .1 «kw may r ' w ‘2 . r . ' r V, new .2. h . ' .. “I“ ' any. .2 t g (_ 15w“? _ t sauna-W A .