The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

l a - WATERUX) Grimm . Wednesday, December 4. 2013 ' AllditOl’ General issues scathing report on rail safety BYhumlmou | v y. of a freight train bound for Elmira g Chronicle Stall“ I last October. \ " _ .m._ . . The Region and the (2in or | . scathing report from Canaâ€" _ fl . " . Waterloo were not told of the Hill da's Auditor General com~ . a. dent when it occurred. Nothing pleted just days before the L is; - . h spilled when the train left the derailment and explosion in Lac- ' , V , - ._ . ’9')!" 1 tracks behind Waterloo City Hall. Megantic. Que. has found serious r. h " a, a“ 7 ~ ' - .. ‘ f“ is?) in March. the Goderich-Exeter safety oversights within Canada's : " a ' ' “a” t 3“ Railway gave a list of the hair railways. . - '5‘ .. '2’ ' T» ’f a: " : ' ardous materials it moves through [he report from Michael Fergu- - ~ - 3 Waterloo to the Citys fire chief, hut . sou, revealed last Tuesday. found _. ‘~ " in y ‘ s that list has not been made ptihlit ' lransport Canada is not doing 7, . .-v‘*‘ ‘ ' " ' f The Chronicle has filed a Freedom -‘ enough to ensure rail companies .‘ *3 ft: , of Information request with the in (anada are operating safely. 3“ :5" .‘ ’ " ' ,. city to access that list, and the Among his findings. Ferguson 9‘ I’ issue is now in the hands of the iound Transport (‘anada had CUI‘n' provincial privacy commission ' pleted inst one quarter of planned . Despite the govemment‘s mow l rallWitV safety audts in a threeeyear _ for more transparency frorii rail period etidiiig iii 2013, and the . way operators. the industry is still report crititi/ed “satetfv manage ' ' reluctant to make safety infornia iiietit systetiis" used In lransport 0 tion public. last week the ( hmni ( anada that put more responsibili- . _. ' "‘ ' cle reported that (1N Rail. which is -' ‘ ‘â€"~ - a l . . _ ‘ ty for safety on the shoulders of ‘4 " ‘ ‘4 A 3‘“? itt charge of maintaining lllt‘ indiyidual rail firms T _ ‘. ’_ _ ' _ . Waterloo spur line. reiused to \ dozen years alter the system Workers ”F F“? "fkla' (in 9” Of a derailmehnt m the City elf Waterloo last year The AUd'm' General has written share how many faults it has lounil . has put in place, lransport (ana- a report "m“ o '3' 5" “V m Canada, “mm was re eased as! week. w New In the line over the past year da is struggling to implement it. aged audit process and inadequate two on Canadian Pacific No audit Will require all railways in (anada (N says it inspects the trunk lergiison said record keeping as areas of con- was done on Via Rail. to tell municipalities what danger twtce per month and a speciali/t‘d "Whether it's pl)lll|t’£il will. t‘ern. Rail safety has been in the otis goods are being transported ultrasonic fail flaw test is also whether it‘s the way that people In the three years ending March national spotlight since the July it through them. Effective immedir administered once per year are putting it in plate, they have to 3012. Transport Canada had com» derailment and explosion ofa train ately.(1lass l railways must provide “The track conforms to all regu figure out what needs to he done pleted inst 14 audits of railway carrying crude oil in lac-Mégantic, details every three months. Class ll latory standards and is in stile l mini now to get that ioh finished." safety management systems â€" where 47 people were killed. and Class lll railways must share operating condition." a ionipam . he told reporters last week, just 26 per cent of what was The federal government the information onceayear. spokesperson said. His audit also cited a lack of required. Six of those audits were responded to the incident two Rail safety has become a local inspector training, a poorly many done on Canadian National and weeks ago when it announced it concern follnwmg the derailment li'r‘rhfilesfmm the loronio SM! ' ' ' :3 . . HOlldaZECj i ,, , I q i' .1; “ff ' .,’ s . . > ‘ I ~ t e er‘ ect l t r ::-‘i .‘ ‘ - 1.3» '1. . ' . .. as. A 2‘ ~ ' , , .. ”My Hat F» c . ‘ - ,_ . . Available at . . I “the". ' ‘ ' ' if -',.-«7 ,1. l Guest Sewices in any r ~ ,,-4 ‘ '. , e . I 5 I; :1 ’. n e o , . if? . ‘ denommation between , .; i. ‘ 1: "us " .. _. one ‘ . . ' 51‘” Hg; . 1 . TEN-VB h L. ,1 10* “tr". y. 37 _ Is. . , . I «K .,“' l ' 0‘ "1'. "a . a; . - . . sail g); t t1 if 3»;er .’ ' v ‘ ’ V. ‘ ,. - * : vet‘s? m .. ~; ,1. - â€" ‘ .. 27:“) , .. . r ,3, if \ ~'.. .2. ., - is“ 1â€": g ;' . t ‘ ‘ Ea?“ .. .‘1‘.- "in m _.. t ‘ .;,-..r-..;: . , h if a? ,. . ., ' ‘ '.;v...,'t< a = 3 " '4 .."t.~.i' = «3 ‘ '4 n, ‘5" I ". I". " 2 1837*», t 15.4. . . l