The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

c . l l'WATFJIlDOW' w» v Mauls Council sets urban guidelines BY [was [MIKSON authority to review and before approval, _.a ' ‘ . . y v ,. _W“(.‘hrllllll‘lt‘jyfllV 7 approve site-plan applica (‘oun. Diane lreeinaii ‘. i“: {Lune is; l ht) ”13"; {)Oug his lions. a responsibility dele also raised the possibility oi . " E ‘ A $ . new report to City galed to staff in l‘ebruary the city bringing in its own ‘ LEt‘l :‘ it h .1 " ~53? =‘i ' i. .» F , H "i council outlines a Quarterly reports to council architect to ensure a tiiore f w Hip ‘ q: (1;; iv. ‘ , i -, 1‘7 . r, . in, l series of tools availr lots have replaced the site holistic direction in the l tiy‘s ‘ , ‘ I, L ‘ ‘ able to councillors to give plan review process. urban design "for not sure ‘ ‘ ‘ “ them a better idea of how to Councillors requested the how we do that, btit it‘s it . i} adequately assess the qualir report from staff in July after piece worth thinking about ‘ . ’ ’ ~ ty of urban design in Water- the first quarterly report was (.otin. Mark Whaley Nils ,/ ; -> g loo. not as informative as they the only vote against the 5 f . , The report. tabled Mon- had hoped. The twovpage report. He liked many of the \ . day, presents a range of report only included the recommendations, including , _ ' , options including a design addresses and a brief the idea of an expert panel. ‘ ‘ /’;/’ ”I ‘ ‘3 .v review panel of experts to description of the number of btit still had concerns wtth . . '. ‘ : ”on!” 3 j, â€"' x '1; promote design excellence, units and storeys what he called a lt‘\t'l ot . 7 . I ' urban design workshops to Councillors said they “mediocrity” in recent con highlight good examples of found the new report helpful struction projects in the city design and an update to the but made small amend In the past. Whaley had save energy urban design manual ments to the staff sugges- used the sitcrplan renew m “F‘s‘fifil‘fs -. pp .3. ”a": ”‘JCENT‘VE approved in 2009. It will also lions. (Ioun. Jeff Henry process to make his (on a a -5 a ' ' V ‘ f " ’ ' ‘ provide individual council requested the quarterly cerns known about the leu-I v. - lots with more fulsome inforr reports be halted in favour of of urban design in the past 'v . r , r ( _ , oil mation on major develop more information provided He was opposed to delegat A, merit projects in their wards. directly to councillors. mg the responsibility to staff. “The process of creating “I think this serves us hob “Why is there st) much good urban design is a col- ter than those [quarterly mediocrity?" Whale) asked ’ laborative effort between reports] and the slight "This is a beautiful docu planners. architects. land~ increase in work we would ment that moves Us forward scape architects. engineers. be adding to staff wed with but it doesn’t answer that ,; I artists, politicians. commu- draw from the other side of crucial question" f nity groups and members of the equation," he said. “let's ()ther councillors have > _ we; the public." said Eno Udoh- remove the wrong tool and said the siterplan review is - ‘ Oink. an urban planner With focus in on thoright tool," not the proper place to voice the city, “Staff conclude the (‘ouncil also requested concerns about urban design site plan review process has any major protects that come since they cannot Ubjt’Ll it J N.” delivered good projects." to siteAplan H'VK’W also the protect conforms with g V Staff will retain the be brought to them the city‘s requirements i '. M . it :- 55! . . _,/ ~ f' ' : .g , ., _ . c a . f ' Anml ’ t . i . . I: ‘ i t . ‘ v f V. 2"" i Receive up to $650 when replacmg your old ., _,.w 1 beating and cooling systems. , ‘ V a < ‘ a: r . V t o t . a“ W F , 5 ‘ Ham-t; i. H-w ".T‘iiwfle, litirtllii lli‘tlrfll‘ll 3 _ , l «r v " 1 ‘ - All saveonenergyca mt i ll \ r I 1 ‘ f; i i l \ h...‘ t .t , an \ 1 i ‘ ’ 10 I I J w h h f ‘ l t [/7 , it t e purchase 0 any Wm Hem. were Inc ‘ ' Z ,, , .. ...... . . ... m. .. 1 . medium or large . , .-.. ,. .. - .u V ”are .. 1 ....r we .,-.. .. “...... ‘ . a ...t .... w... o..- who... a... . ...". ...... A; if. . , if" 535% kw”- ...; ‘ ‘ hot speCIalty beverage H m I .. ‘ ‘ "a" L I” 1‘ ‘ArpmxvaumquMuwwczourutim