Waterloo Public Library Digital Collections

Waterloo Chronicle (Waterloo, On1868), 25 Sep 2013, p. 11

The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

Wmmm'mykptemberumfl'll o g g . City goes worst to first in library costs . .. .» ... . . -. , . . , i . . ‘ 333; ',. 5 -.~ - feet?“ a ' . BYIAMBIACIGON per person that year. uses." v29 ’ 3%“ “J‘ l .52... I TFO“ (.‘IironirleSlafl compared to $46.34 in In lune. the Chronicle 2. it ' " " . 8m ‘ Cambridge and $41.44 itt reported the YMCA was { " ”WE tie library costs Kitchener. already looking to expand its . GAD!“ Wham) Jumped in Costs per use are also sig- services by adding about Kâ€"w , recent years, (Ioun. nificantly higher in Waterloo 10.000 square feet of space Â¥ - Karen Scian said it is a reflec- than Cambridge or Kitchen» to the facility. ‘ ‘ 5 , tion of the city investing in or. From 2009 to 2012, costs At the time. Scian said the W09 .. what residents want. rose from $1.29 to $2.20. In library and YMCA were cru- owing I‘ll . The per capita operating Cambridge, costs have gone cial for the underserviced Â¥ U. 3” ll.‘ 9 costs for library services down from $1.94 to $192. west end of city. 3 an” ‘I'I, have there than doubled and Kitchener has seen costs Other highlights from the ~ ~ “III * ‘ from $30.83 in 2009 to risefmm$153to$1.80. Municipal Performance 9.9. . .-!99 4 ‘ $65.24 in 2012, with $28.45 The larger investment in Measurement Program it 9 '7‘" “9V " . g y . g , of that attributed to the new libraries has seen a corre- report include: lowest fire 9.: 9 ,9 1-: . I 9 ‘3 9: » ' F l a 9 .9 m lohn M. Harper Branch spending increase in library operating costs among local of» " .44 was 1:;-:¢,9;;.,,:;g - ’ .. ..- . . . my), ~" ‘ is..:..9., . V. . Library on the city's west use inWaterloo. municipalities, the most .; #33 ‘i‘ 9 ‘ 33?: end. Between 2009 and 2012. water main breaks and 9 7 :7; ‘7. a“ ' .; Cambridge spent $45.63 uses per person have spendingmore percapitaon “» R 2.3,: per person last year. and increased from 24 to about rectution than local munlc- " , ,, mi l.’ - . 3' Kitchener spent $47.57. 30. Overall library visits have ipalities ;: ' ‘ ‘ ~ are n} 9 g- Tbe data was presented also increased by almost a The complete report is . \ 3‘1 9 r" .9 5;; to council as part of the million. from 2.9 million vis- available online at .. ' ~ '9' ,. 3i) ' ‘31- annual provincial Municipal its in 2010 to 3.8 million in www.mterlooca/en/govem ‘7 ’ ‘ ' ' ‘7‘ 7" Performance Measurement 2012. ment/auditedfinancialstate . 33" 9,. “ 99‘ 99 9 Program data report last ln Cambridge. library use mentsasp 99:9 " ' 9 ' . ‘ 9 99;? week. per person is about 24. 99. 9.. 99 ,. , .9 ._ . a "_ 9'9 9 9- .9 999.9294 The jump in costs has and in Kitchener it’s a 7 i I .2 « mm .9 ‘ ' f been linked by staff to the little over 25. Barbara 9-19 - 9- , ' 511 .f‘ u opening of the lohn M (Ioun. Mark Wha- B “d hl :9‘ . 9 t ' Harper Branch Library In ley said these higher re emue m 9, 3;” fl " i , L _ - ' 201 1 The $22 million project use numbers are justi- P.” r ,9 , " ., , , . 1 ' at 500 Fischer-Hallman Rd fication for the higher 25 ) OX MC. ' ‘ 9 N also includes the Stork library costs and he m “18:96“. . .9 , . ' ' 9 ” ‘ lamilyYMCA. worries about the use ‘ Work 1 . “.8 w i ‘ A. i 24 M"- Scian. who serves on the of the municipal W 9 9. . , . . ' ' “_ " . ‘ ,9, ' WPL board and whose ward “scorecard” that only 9"... I f ' h . . ' i L ' is home to the new library. looks at costs. / WM 5‘ "”4"- ‘ " 2' "v“; ‘ said she is proud of the city's ‘((Zosts) are higher ‘ investment in libraries and because they‘re more I“ M said it wassorelyneeded. used.” said Whaley. kw ,m . . ”There's another frame to “So when you come a“ m 9 _ look at this through. that we up with a scorecard 5;. 9 4' ‘ are living our values and [lit‘ that only worries 9 m :58 7&9 2 '9' investments that we‘re malt about operating costs 9 mg are coming through loud but doesn‘t talk about Some SATURDAY .5 - and clear." she said value and usage. you WW3 available 3 n e 9.â€" lti 2009, Waterloo spt-nt tome up With wonky V's" Barb on he! “0‘ M - “ lllt' least pt't person on numbers that make us W at mwmm9m . . 1",, liliran son'ltt's pvt person in look bad but the coin MM s l 9? W s.” the In ( int-s month tt‘lt‘hflili'\ warmlou \‘H'Hl $.50 Ht ll]!!\4'\l'1\ll1111g\.llltl 5' 9-743- l9l4 ‘M m ‘ 10 than St. E. Wank» .. a- ,, . . . TARPS (“95-9, , tally ResponSIble Investing COVER "a FOB WITH! 0 ' - ‘ .‘. ‘1 t _ r-ti i .9 .1 ‘tlt ” . f; 1‘. i ' . V v ‘ I A ‘ 9 ‘ A I V ‘ 6' x 8' IIIICICCOIIIIIIII“ ‘ l 9,9b ‘1‘ 2; . ~ :.'.'t {A 3 ‘5 g ‘ 7 .K’ ':92 3 I 10’ x 15’ IOU-IIIIUIIIIII a ' ~ 95 .7 r 15' x 20' ’1 5 $3295 _ 9 ,9” 9‘ 9 9 20'x30’.......... Plus many other sizes/colours to choose from 9 m mm 3m including came print C 2.00% mammary no unmanned-mu J‘tntlwm ubfiulufinumwm humus-um” menus-um IMO-tmlfitHutO-tho-O umuuounIâ€"I-q-u-n-fiâ€"l-h-i-h-IIâ€"Q ‘ Mmmnm‘ Sam!“ mm mm 1 a and ('rcdtt l'nmn www.muu (um i 519 7‘61770 9 l 9

Powered by / Alimenté par VITA Toolkit
Privacy Policy