The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

l ' ~ mm-Mhifll3-1 . htflhflflflnuhw ft 7g , mmosmr CAN if?” a: BOUGHT mom. :4 I , ' ‘ 431%, V mmwmmm ~ ' Wow “0an «acumen. p‘ ‘ :1 ' Mfume EWW“ W'- "" 519-746-7900 m g TheWaterlooReglonlandflllonErbSueetinWatedoolsoneofMopotemialsitetfoflhe ' proposed Nosdids facility. The Cambridge landfill is the other possible site. "New I O BlOSOlldS plant may be pushed back Continued from page i sion to name Cambridge as eyeing a construction date of the preferred site. At a public 2016 but Yajima sail this new public about what the proj- information session in Camv round of public information ect is and how it might bridgeinApril.however,resi- could push the expected impact theeventual location. dents and business owners construction date back a which may have led to many packed the Cambridge year. unanswered questions and Sports Park inopposition. it will cost the region $60 misinformation about the Regional councillors in million to build and another project both cities, including Water- $20 million in debt financing The region is planning a loo's lane Mitd’iell and Mayor costs to build the facility. four-pronged public infor- Brenda Halloran and Another $150 million will be mation approach this time Claudette Millar of Cam- spent (Mar the 25-year life of around, including informa- bridge. told the Chronicle in the plant, bringing the total tion in the regional Envi- February they would prefer it cost of the facility close to a V ronews publication, preparâ€" if the plant was not built in quarter of a billion dollars ' ing fact sheets on the heat theircity The heat dryer would ’ drying facility, new public City Coun. Scott ther, occupy four hectares of land information sessions in whose ward is home to the and handle waste from the Waterloo and Cambridge in Waterloo landfill. said while region's 13 wastewater treate- the fall and a public input there was a sense of relief for merit plants, with the goal of meeting at regional council. him and the community drying about 90 per cent of The public has made its when Cambridgewasnamed the region’s biosolids, or opinion on the issue loud the preferred location, he about 185 tons per day, by and clear. with many in both acknowledged no final deci- 2041. cities vocally opposed to the sion wasever made. Currently, the region project out of concerns of “Everyone said a decision trucks its biosolids out of the increase truck traffic. odour. was not made, and until a region at a cost of more than noise and impact on local decision is made there will $3.4 million per year. Staff waterways be some concern.” said his deal would not be The vocal opposition in The region initially target» impacted by the delay in Waterloo came first. with ed ll possible sites for the construction. since the regional staff acknowledging facility before narrowing it to region is able to renew the it played a role in the deci- two. Engineers were initially contract on a yearly basis We rs hip Wit h U s _, . , V, ,-f4~y‘;,fԤ = is} SATURDAY ,-, ' % if i 3;, _ , . ' is, , _ [1,; My” , 1“" " a 53°31.me Service .. ,‘ ‘ We =:. , 1‘? - = "a; 1;". We: . ' a. a A: 3" 4 . . F». .7 " 7 , 3&3: ; ”J", Mammal“ l0 ADVERTISE VOUR ' ,. ‘ 3:, We; i a"; ; if“ Ma‘sâ€"1. “ »» it“; '2 with i 3 ' 3:3 “ ' . 7 22 WNW - 5191503397 senmcts (mum » ._.. ,- f '» what???” {,2 f’” . £25 . 3w: . 5%: . 55a my-ncdoodvumca MATT mun AT fining. .,. if n ,, . i. ,n 3‘. ;, , .. 1' . . 1‘ M5 = ’7," “We ‘3' “*" imwthâ€"mmrm 5196234395 IZOGov '1‘“, 1*" : ' ‘ $4 , 93.45, #3,}: 3,- iii» .: :i u:.:;':’;:=" 94-3 ‘ FM “lad-rm l0p.m. Manama-69mm ca W , " “ " " ‘ , ,1” v ., , ’ “mum...