Waterloo Public Library Digital Collections

Waterloo Chronicle (Waterloo, On1868), 4 Jul 2012, p. 8

The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

l-WAmam-Wy.hflyl.20l2 ' 279% St N.. Sit I] ‘ " WJXIIWNZI 3“! “98862830 Fit. SWMOSKS myulmdllwlm M “" _ ' ' ' ' ” Peta wmxum l HIBLISHFJI - "‘7‘ fiftyâ€"3"; ":7; ~;_ ~. ‘ “W, > ' ~ ~~ m THANK GOODNESS .~ “m“: F0 555 SPRlNGER WI ‘ , BobVRB R MO 1 E33 WE" ,, " ‘ L J a ' mm at. 229 “13.732; 7 ' t , .. ‘ oditorlllOV/Iterkllchrmiciexa POOL“ A TRUE (334" * a , ' , . V WWW. HlDDEN 6EM' Jordan mar . --' up " ‘ new at. 2ls 2'- jerciIOe/Itdhochmniclen ’ 1 ‘ James iACKSON I am en. m3 _ [I I. \ , New _,._“‘_"i",“,‘.‘i',‘:1 ( 1 . . ”(a » anvumsmo .. ‘- ' 7 W 3‘ A, , e» _ ..-. ._ Ted mmson ext no t . ( ’ . ., , . 5 ‘5' ~flg~§fflfci RFDIONAL AD MANAGER ‘ ‘ - ~ , 5.14;:- 727;;tfih'fljfigf‘} ."~ 2;“; a). ' ukxfiwueflomhmniclesa :: I "' ' .7 ’ V -_ .~ \ - ' ' Esteé 4&3Ҥ'1-â€"a~ Q5“; . _ ~ ~ - : ::.~_ 1; ~‘tfify-L 1:: 5 ’* ~ “*3 mm“ v a . ‘ ~ \v ., . ' - g “are” _ Heather BOYD ext. 222 T“ . ' v '3 ., . , hhtydaflm‘hflfllfltklfl . a C Brendon mvmsoN m. 223 “I . t ! twmdmsUwaterkxlchnmldeca ‘ .- 3, I J p» , angina) 4 ,â€"â€" ' " r"? Y "m 4" sin-M5130 »’-‘ ”VJ” 4" -' 5' - fl ‘ vacuum ‘ “”8628” m. m M . . Cut-dim Mic-tints Mail sues l “Hemmer”. Changes savmg Clty money , mesons 3 1W Stud-d Said Num- 'l'h ‘lm rs am n the lone 20 edition of unemcient. \ "“653" .0921)”, e n be g e Ithe Waterloo Chronicle. A f i \ 1 WNH electricity cus- 4: ‘WCWJ'M ttnigtteppeattltatatyorvnterlooeotmcilwasallttle Hardymmusedwatgr I l .t ‘Ommmnm‘hesameas t m <9.) too quick in putting their own backs when m billing being transferred in ' -. City of Waterloo property l dcuPetmpitanumbets. house at the City of Water- taxpayers. WNH customers l in the city's teoently telettsed zoll consolidate iinan- loo as an example of the , ”WW0" MW - gm W cial statements. council heard that total debt percepita is We“ “Ck Of MW.“ 1' consumed by the homes, __...V W $553 per person in the City orwatetloo That's the observed at the city dunns Wand non-imper- , The Win-mick t. W lowest that number has been in the last decade for the Name.” a mullet omit. ' ty-taX-payms preemies of ‘ «ch Wednesday by Metrollud and and” w some “INN that the [0“ng Cltlunl WHEN: t; the dtyand “Wilts of i Maw“ EitheMnkeRlMMwuehmnypmhehmgm hismnichhmmnkof \ WWW“! ‘ omnnonass COUNCIL MMbmisofthatmasumnemmthattheCityof WBWMlM ~ "if: my ”Mime“ ‘0 l 11: WM'E “I'M?" Waterloo had a population base of 124.000 people. “10““ be “Rd to illustrate P‘Y status quo amount. «Them-”P'Tucmlm Recent Statisticannadaiigureselmthose population efficiency Penmpsasoiten BOB mumbc‘ity'wouldueglective- 1 W W” W m - ' devil MAVIN so dizing com- ‘ be ,A 1' numbersaremudllawer. 5019mm isinthe . _ . . JE’lfifim’m? in fact. census data suggests there are only 98.780 W mums] and institutional l ( “I'M I’m“ 5'" hr "in“ '0 0" people living in the City oiWaterloo as of 2011. putting it M0“ readers "“8?“ find ment 0‘ even more efliden- use” as well as non-City 9f ' “new Ullltsolvcd complaints under the magical 100,000 mark and skewing all “In“ all the futon; that went mtg desirnheiutme. Waterloo homes and busil- t :1“ h‘ F2?” [1" 22“": '5’"? lions based on population. the analysis that led to this Pilot m are planned moses ‘ 7"“? - ‘ " 0“ s "‘1' '" ° Us‘ h w l t’ n u bets the debt ‘, decision rather boring so | forcitizemtohavetheabiltty The nearly two years of ‘ lm.1mm,0N.M.8ll, mgt ene popualo n m . we . up“ ratio 30” up by "my $150 to $711 87 per person will W on the main tutor. to pay property tax, water analysis and negotiations l (gil’stliiHT ' m in the my ' the mmwmm W billsi etc. et a gunk: oft?” between the city and WNH ’ mitt-Sled at; ;:wynlrmy: Those numbers aren't nearly as rosy as the previous the annual WM cost of as.“ ”- "8903;32- “8‘ were “Name and profes- thetl hilly int Wm“ nun comma ones released and leaves council having to eat some crow tronsfen'lng “’3‘" billing in . (kinda f p08 5‘0“”- . . ’ tut purposes All out" fights it: instead ofcrowing about the city's accomplishments his column. he failed to presentation 0 WW Cfl‘amlyt if agreement int-nod and C(X'llil‘n‘la] use is pole To be flit, City of Waterloo debt has hue" from $78 mention What .the City was (a! 812‘! watt: En“: “‘8‘ h“, been {guild there the 1 “12:1, TL“;,,;‘,':,’,.“;§.;',,‘I‘,: million in 20m to a little more than $70 million in 2011. prewously Pawns Waterloo 5 0" "’5“ d'“ W" “W “'°“ Pay ‘ ° 3".“ Erma”; or the (m at the copy And there is no doubt that the city is on better financial North “yd!“ (WNHl ‘0' pet- it???“ costs an: 3:23”: “”3"“ for We mfg??? l "m H "mm WWW” cm looting than itwasadecade ago. ionningthisservloe. her of water billin cus- :eTlfesbalfli wou “t' ‘ "" 3“” V'“"‘"- "4““ w‘m‘” But these adjusted population numbers are worri- The total annual “’3‘ l0 .8 0 e “33' “0 ac ‘0“ ‘M‘mk' Z79 Wm 5' N“ 5”" some for the city. as is the slow rate of growth that the perform ““3 “Wk“ in- tomers on electronic pay- would have happened lithe l 20. weight. 0mm N21 3m census ed with Waterloo only in“ by L3 per house W “93300 as cor- menu W unused city had contlni‘lelzlto pay l thrmts POLICY cent. or 1,300 people. since the last census rectly “filed by WWI“ ““3 bl! 0": h p" “m 5m“ "2‘30" "mm“ Y wring f ltfla‘ it I" “in "I“ m it: The debt per capita number is lust one of the num- annual W“ by the CW ( e 3 re 33d“ prpegg ‘ the WW“ $493,000.Water- , m" '“" "m “m" m bers that will continue to be skewed until the city estab< 0' Waterloo '0 WNH ‘0 P0" Wye“ y “5 “3 '°° ““1““ would if?” f ml with: run-ha we“: m m” immpuwlmm hm. form this service in 2009 Payment feature sIInply excellent grounds to cnncme ; ":mwml'flwwfruufit‘rz': _ . q , ,_ . ., h .. were $724,000. The annual started using the some thedty, i publlehed than will not he with “" ' " _' -: savings for the City oiWaterâ€" approach for ”'9" W3!" The full committee ”P0" lit-Id “mknwmefittm ' too was estimated at bills:themeterleadingcosts an befound ontheCity of . on“: 1% any (flimsy . $231.”. mgguzedxsli‘dbzyofrm Waterloo website at l M’ In: 5].,wa Having water billing in- e mwaterlooce ‘ t: by chill" It,lo editori~ ' house at [he dly Ibo creates zones Way In M “' .loettetltmieo-ieieu at by melt opportunities W W. All of the above are lust BobMauiil is rhefimnercm - «y “we“ '0 WW “-0-“- glee and economies of scale examples of oncolns mom dwatyolwmflw (no wetsuits": Suit to. m that will permit the develop at the city to become more ‘ l V l

Powered by / Alimenté par VITA Toolkit
Privacy Policy