The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

s-wamwouma- 1 , - a t|.zo|2 ' ’ manna-amp fire code compliance was andstepdadoftwoww uni- . may confirmed with an inspec- varsity students I don't _ s w . ° --. , . tion from Waterloo Fire Rees understand how city coun- ,_ _ , . . ,--':‘, . ”we , E , The City ofWaterloohad cue prior to a license cilors can state that this $7 p u c s e n r s 31. ' 1 ' ; 3 rahdlnneariyaquu'ter issuance. Under the new bylaw is for safety reasons W.‘ " , a; $3 t 3. ; million dollars in rental bylaw. landlords attest to and then fall to implement ‘ ix if“ i m s - ‘ “55 "i’I'. ' housing licensing fees late compliance in their license fire safety inspection meas- .-,-\ v ~~ - f ., , . _ at? @1 ‘ last weekâ€"just days after application and no inspec- ures.’ Zito said. “is the t ' 4 V the municipality's new donkrequired. importance of safety not »~ 1 \ 5.4 bylawoflcialiytookeffeet. Councillors leff Henry bremostontheagenda? , I i" ' ‘ The city's controversial and Karen Scian said the “i find this bylaw dollar ’ as , ~ ' i , ' g bylaw was implemented inspectionmsremoveddue first. no safety. second \ ' ' ~ - we} use" as W 3 April l.aitermuchprotestby tobudptpreasurea s approach to implementing , u 1 H ._ - ‘ z ' i - jg as local landlords and just Landlord Paul lackson. thisbyiaw isaclear indica- , ' ‘_‘ . ' E A , 6 R ‘ a fi §i§q‘ “ § {2 weeks afteran inquiry into whorerttsouttworesidenoes tioothatlt’snotabout safety. 6: , “f";- -¢"§ 9 -§::-â€" _- £1; - 1; whether the bylaw discrimi- at 237 and 239 Shakespeare but more about student con 1 5 A ' ~ . u 11. is; if if ‘ 7 I; nated was launched by the Dr.. recently licensed his trol, student zoning and a " -, an; “a ._ r , Ontario Human Rights (hm- rentals under the new bylaw collection of com." , A i; , v; 1; a" 1; ;~ ‘ ' mission. â€"andhadflreinspectionsin Zito pointedtoa2004city m i ‘, ,_,;,~ ‘ Director ofbyiawenfotceâ€" the past because of the old student accommodation ‘ KJ m . 1 1 has '~ \ ment lim Barry. said about rules. study that said. “Licensed Ts, " 5; , ‘i " ‘ miicemeshadbeenyant- Hesaidifthecitywasso lodginghousesaresomeof ; ~ g: - p. < , Q ed by the end of last week. concerned about safety it the safest housing in the city ’ y , j j'; if 51:1 L g ' - v E? resulting in an estimated would have forced unliâ€" sinoetheymustmeetgreater “Ar ~. ~ ‘» '" ” ’ _ _ y ‘ $240.(X!)paidm city. censed homes to sign on standards of safety than “it's where we thought withthenewbylawfirst. other types of housing and "M‘ ' """‘ " ' "‘" ' ‘ ' “ ’ " " """‘” "' we'd be.’ Barry said. “We "Whynotfirsttargettboae they are inspected at least might beslightly hidter.’ 5.000 or so units that likely every secondyear.’ Landlords would have have never seen a city or fire Without the inspection hm». ~~ ‘- also coughed up an addition- department inspector.” lack- provision. Zito said the safety a] $27,000 in processing fees son said. “if the new bylaw claims of the bylaw didn’t â€"at $68 per application. was truly about safety they makesense. But the wiawpassedwith would have targeted the 'How else can you justify it” Q . much talk of improving safe- unlicensed units first.” ‘ providing less safety meas- - â€" ty. was still getting the Rocco Zito is a local land- ures for two-and-a-half a , 2 $53,159”? ,- - thumbs-down from land- lord and also has two step- times the cost â€"- license â€"' h , " ' ”” lords after the Chronicle daugiters in school atWilfrid under the old system was N; ”4 f - , reported proactive fire Laurier University. He said 5260. under the new system ‘ . a V“ ' 5 IO, 5 inspections were scrapped to Waterloo city council had $690 â€" and target some of _ “if if awash. thrmmsafetytothewind. diesafesthousinginthecity - "N ”a «c . " +' Under the city's old bylaw, “As a lodging house owner first.” Zito said if 1 _. a “â€" _,__. ~ ~ an i "as is f’ C b “M“ our: if} NISSAN ALTIMA 2.55 (VT ' . 0 80.00' Q ~_ 0 84 -_ 0 , . Free funjor everyone! 0.1,“ ' i'ui’."'-'_- ”in”: '_',.<‘- . ,. g . JolnueSaturday.Ap|-il21,2012 . 6”me from 9a.m.t02p.m. “w'm‘m 'forafree,one-hour uldadbuetour f \ Neal‘s-flan 9 ’ ’ , \ Mal Rout-vow e . . ”f This is a popular-m ' ' 0- ‘___‘ ’ _J Waterloo Waste Managemt site. a Enterand park a'r-Gau $5. 527 1001 abstract“ Waterloo N A” «a; if“. ‘l ' f r‘ ' E; ‘A'. if} 34 .mh' Gm”! 51ms-e1oomse1o , L7 if; “11.5; ‘ ' , ”5324" .:‘ui‘?;§ £5 a?” 4 »' ' ' ‘ .‘ - - '- A 11:7" ....v'1‘?vlfrsz¢it4‘:x‘fâ€" firesâ€"£5; fl-“L'V‘ s L.” g f a: f s I “ _ a v‘::%"_ $3?" WM“ 5? ‘ ‘b . v e ”if; _ . . i m «a ’ ‘ % h “A ' 1 " ? Qt” i _ A WWW.remonotwaterloocalm/aisle 4