The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

I I «W. ' suntan ' 6 his.” ”Mucous concernslromdevelopers ' my fluted h we and W about What dendty eatensive public consulta‘ is measured In units to 4g . egg. g1 %: Kr .. a a: _ ., . hadwoflthtarloo h tion In the term oi public hectare. to bedrooms to if a “5% wk -_I A 1-! g-éri K wrapping up consul- meeting. houses and hectare. lanes with density w ; “,4, “(in g ‘ “ 4K tadononitsptopossrl mnmuhomthe muddleneed , 5 *e« (*"p new“? . ~ g} at .= M I Ilpllll withthe I II '0' I 1 mm 2;; , \ a , ., . [a «a; ment expected to be vdonarui n. -» :1; K 4 K4; . 1 K 4. apprwed ”an in the “TWmn'tdo I More “anymo- ' "f ,5‘ ‘ ’ 5.“ “ . ‘ neat man a ons on t s we - giai‘JL. A; L in. ~ «a .. a me plan was resented anything-fl” received by "1' city. will“: 3.1.331, . it. gt: , 7 I; a a we open 8...... last Northdale. They mew!!!“ " a I I 'A 1 it I I it ;“Q - wed. brnwaan’t ptth'igthe (thee! ) 1007!? The Northdale neigh- K . g 4;; . reg: mpmm 0' bourhood received much {an . ‘ ' ”New helpusdo Wow ;.‘ daleroals‘lent.monhand hill n residentsrequeatedlanduse ‘7‘}: ‘ t}; the”. W 8' chug to the neighbour .4 % , 15"? '- l-le waan't particularly -mm hood considered before :‘ 1 5:2: ~ _ > if. it. . irnpremerl. ~ mm the Northdale studywae on. I, “’3- «‘, £13.?) fig} '3’ K " :4 '- 11* doesnt do anythir‘ iahed. ' ‘ ' ~ i ' " “' £4} for Northdale.‘ Paiubeski Council could adopt the No changes to zoning or ' aaid. plan as-is. with amend- other lanning matters for , A , Wham Ilium ments or choose not to Northgale were Included in Street. across from the ior- adopt the plan and direct the official plan with three mer St. Mid-elk schod the. «new rote diam exceptions: redesigneting an!“ and said heir [assumed with Following city council's Waterloo Collegiate Institute the slow rate of change in adoption of the plan. it hum low-dorm reeidential what was once a thriving would require regional to major institutional. gen- iarnilycornmunity. approval erai change to land we cat- “ 4,. ‘They (the city) won’t The plan could then be comics that apply to similar 5 » :gma fl .. , help us do anything.’ he subject to appeals at the lands throughout the city m ’ " ‘ said. Ontario Municipal Board. and redesignation of Veter- . Nordrdaleresidentshave Theplancennotcomeinto ansGreenParklromrnedi- . at ‘ been vocal in the of.“ year. force and effect until the urn-density residential to - ~._ . . accruingthecity waging completinioftheproceea openepoce. V a.“ ‘ c " “dw its feet on plans for the Several issues had been The plan con be found at " ‘ embattled neighbourhood. raised with the plan since wwwwaterioocalplanitwate whilealandusestudyand lune 2011, according to rlooOornrnentsontheplan community improvement planningreports. can be submitted to plan“â€" - . flanworeunduway The issues ranged from watuiooewatuiooca _ . , THE PBIHGESS BliiflMS’ K . NISSAN ALTIMA 2.38 (VT NN| K 80.00” K 0 .. 34 . o r, 71“ A ' -: a 1. ’ \ ”a -V . M . K v W ‘ " .1 MARCH 12 16 2012 \ ' .4 t N: I} ' r, I K n , SE “'5 AT Will mm W! “I » $500 ‘uyummuuumm I ‘ Ina-momm- ”in ail its I“: w I ”at 2 0 h M a lee 1. ' A“! EM 0 I” 41% 'P'm: I a " 5‘9‘*"”'356° FIJJ - m ‘ um ‘ ‘ ' ' 5‘ ‘ : «In ,