Waterloo Public Library Digital Collections

Waterloo Chronicle (Waterloo, On1868), 1 Feb 2012, p. 8

The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

l-mm-MWI.NIZ T m“& N». St 3) l . sumo-m nu ma SIM!” Fax: SUD-“9333 emu-e- + Pea: WINNER wausuut mnuuAL ' ~' ‘ ' IT IS ABOUT TIME WE HAD ,. Bob VRBANAC < ~ â€"- - e , ;WW.=;;§zmmm SOME suow, BUT I STILL LlKE M'""‘°°""“‘"-“ T0 COMPLAIN ABOUT IT . Paige Desmono “my ext. 203 ' O MUM-rhnmxkca Joni-t mm m1 ext. 2|5 punitflwalcrloodaoniclexa \ Ammsmo (my nunâ€"nae cat. no " ' RETAIL “(as MANAGER . . saleaQw‘ednndunnicle ca 7. Mus WAnvr-x ; Heather BOYD Cal. 222 ~ MQVUu'lood-micleca m - it“; ’ s ‘ if . ‘ “an; -‘ f ;» t ‘ mean-gemsomnfig I" . _ e. t. ‘ , _ ifi . _ 0 TS“; “' ‘ ’ " " " r ' " , A“; _ p, ' \ ammo " ' ' “ (mm SIMMaL 213 l WWW W Will region prove them wrong? ;; Ian-had Stand-rd Saw Num- n mus the Chronicle but also by providing Nancy Button, rapid i hmmeylo For 0m tile tells OW a mm stronger evidence of one's transit director, said a gen- 1 WM “192 Apmntjy, a] the comm, raised by mm, and the costs of rapid transit argtnnent than the counter- era] engineering comultant H E Q students about changing bell times has swayed here. WW‘NHD- would conduct the value } localpublicsdiooln'usteestoconsiderdismiasingthe “oxen-nonalcng Thath-lvetwh-Ppen Wanda-j m ~ plan. experts costs no 3. e as Accra 7 Public board trustees owed-mo the plan no protect looked. from their tin-sh the moon wreck x. week. putting it off until Feb. 13 when the board is M mbnnfi-Iyinfl-t- t the plan needs some work he via-loo cat-ids is new in its Mm â€" o po n o - “W W ed t the intofbeing andthecosts eedathr mi "mm! by "cw-"4 But school board chairCatherine Fife told the Chron- Mic-third New than wr- ‘ ouch review 3 “a” idethisumktheplanmaybeeflectiveiydeadandatthe Immense-dinetoomupztw “14:12:11“ hazing!" i mnmowucn. has: dtangestobelitimeswon’tbecomidered WWW"! - W0“ W n ‘ withstood-uncle u a w MW"! 30572013 school ya}, United Kingdom. the other studLed said reviewed to : an?“ "F“O‘F‘fl M This came after an adnovrledgement at last week's from B.C.. Wide with no eat an every penny ‘ man-den mph-m scala- m . . vested intaest in the scrutinized before even _ » school board meeting that shitting secondary scth w ‘ fifi'finfi'fiffifli'z startlimmlaterinthemomingwhilemovingtheeie millionth-ruin»- WWI‘MM t -- manna-unmanned: mm whom day up (08am- wasmore about“, Since the story broke, it Asmuchoftheengmeer- ‘ mumgmn: 58W than it wasshout betterstudent adiievement. seems all I have heard from ing and other technical ;. Com“. 2 a...” Sm, Sm. Especiallystneetherewesnoteee-rdt presented that “TM“ “in PAIGE 3°" 23351; 35:15:54; . | “onyx”; suggestedstartingprimaryschoolkitkeariyinthe Y cape “W008 We“ ‘ m mammmmmm day â€" not why the region is DMON'D out. was the expertise to We, can a What this was all about was trying to better align m} . Pl.“ “I?id transit really t emu-u by my "231", l. transportation with both local school boards and with We been 5°“ Viz“ w" “gem 3“?le- ”hi? the; i:- tlae Niall-tee? $ a a.“ m. the blic board to in more than $1.3 million in comm PM “it“ nee! WWW ‘ I: W 0 am 0 ques- e-al :’roael All other rights we n p" it would "330 £0 low C‘lholk: board will ent countries. projects in cats Ltd. In the Unit“ King- non? . : W~M~uw quicklylollowsuitdespiteextendingitsconsultation Wmumw domw-oneoftheexperts Iamnotaneapertandlf ! I hinted. ans-z?"yuu;:lltruu i in: Rh. [5 imponlefiuueg on Isomcsdoutiorthescory. l were. It probably “UH!“ 1 ‘ mdhwdum. Whatthistempesthiateapotwasreallyalxxnwua m“.- ”405“ All“ mudtconveisation mums ‘ . h r | w . . battle with the prunince shunt how it funds "mum,“ (ion h making the ”up“ back and forth between The Waterloo Region 1 rich Vie-ac, “It. Water: mm Manama“, “mm more waive, the land myself and Cockle, he took rapid transit project rated ; M am as. St N. Son: "a, with the tough W comm“ the pmmm acquisition is minor but It upon himself to one: his No.36 on infrastructure nmmmwv 5 h I Nooklkeitwillget I “d mumm- servicestotheregionand magazinelleNewCanads's i mm inthenearhmue. tablethemglonapsojectla cam-mam Top 100 Projects. which , 14- a as can â€"a orâ€" a: This is proof local parents d and, g. ha medal m oth- rapid sandy. rates the most expensive menusâ€"swan.- wmumflflxmwfi witanddueixedoesn't ‘Not surprisingly, the projectaoftheyear. magnum-na-Aaa-u “he“ mnovermpnpuhrdadsiunl wmnnedinmpel’klb- regionsaIdno. lymlewhentrainsare dishâ€" -â€"hn a --i all! h people But what's ith d Iii nine-a- pup- and til ntl he metre a compared to «Mr wrong w expecte to start ro ng M,nâ€".u|..h.m. m savingregionaltaxpayersa Willemhwfllbe in “k m h "d" “41 fl Basically. Waterloo bit olcaah? Interesting to see crime the t a. u up: any “has let lie ion 1. special “a the According to regional project stands on the cost 1 km a v m [4.1 -y 8 h fl ., h is ”my”, mmm Conn. SQ.“ Strickland the “loin MN“: .. », call us “m"? For me. . pod “mt P3 procurement approach l'd hazard tongue“ the nominate-unz- or at; out “m on" digpfo'e' the being proposed by the region‘s project get even \ ‘ ;nsaa.an‘hm_w_h{ claimsofanopponentby regionwouldflndanyefli- umspsdal.asitclimhsup I “will findinglault in theirfacts. dude-mum thelht. â€"d__._._Â¥ ,7! , I

Powered by / Alimenté par VITA Toolkit
Privacy Policy