Waterloo Public Library Digital Collections

Waterloo Chronicle (Waterloo, On1868), 1 Feb 2012, p. 1

The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

I , â€"â€"â€"â€"â€"__ a ,, s *0 ' e a! e a ‘ ~ _ “ServingyoE community smce91856 â€"â€"-â€"â€"â€".~ WEDNESDAY. mum-1.1012. . um limo...‘ a memme ' - p ‘ ,-, j, , , . l ’ h ' ' ‘ ‘ Dont s oot . _ V . l the budget ‘\ w messenger "* “ l «t * ‘ : ‘flf/fi w Fate of m budget g V {_ task mum in ‘ A \ limbo after report Irma-n. i 4Q”â€" ‘ . ‘Alrrs Focus ‘ tough a m at city coun- gfil‘on “adrift!” ciftlzene' ' ‘ IM-s- “WWIG 50 , get I one or its MSW donned report into hour to lave the ‘ city caah. they didn't heck up their , ' f mm-mmmmd I“@ , . 1 me group! mundane past budget day ‘ , - ~» 44:? 73534;;‘f‘it' 1 on Fetus. ; - u g ' .. egg ‘ { At city council Monday Mike 1&3“? -13, ”Ff _ " ’ " . 4 e Mayeehan. chair of the task force. j???“ ‘ " ' 1 delivered the group's final report. a t, w a?” . ' I winch recommended everything item " » '3 the ere-ho of an enable-y allure at ; l ‘, ‘ city hall. to not implementing an ' ‘ hour-com tax levy and reviewing , “at ‘ ‘ ' “Emulation. ,; 3", .4; Healeorerpeuedmotglingdti- _ ‘ ‘ . v: ~ :‘mnm ‘ l _ . .m- wmmme linkingthe plunge 3113mm W mnmmxâ€"wmmum-mummwmmmma . Conn-ScoflMmlmmdm- mmotmmwmmsqmmmmmmmmmmnu WWW ‘Posedlmkvdldvlm Muir whom “oratory-imam mmmmmtwmmm. maloecasphrhat eek - . i There vote no qualms aaked of . . , . The W _ Magnetron, a trend many council (1 b h1nd ‘ 13 We...“me Reglon stan s e LRT estimates . ”‘8” ”a? “mum" “at a“ mane-no new: than W and offered to Nancy Button. director of rapid didn'tmeanooundlwugtvlngthe _ML Win-WM” mitaaldthetedonhadiuown citizen committee diet-titan: to End eifidenciea. m ‘ - ‘ .Nm m any W W he Region of Waterloo is We already have a lot of 'A consortium lead by Hatch C“ - . doesn‘t mean I don‘t value the well atandingfgrehind Its cost experts who have looked at our Mott MacDonald ha assisted the v- 3' sum lipid transit in plan.“ Mitchell said. 'We will keep region in engineering, planning an" may by the co mittee. Freeman the region, despite experts who moving on with the process and and preparing cost estimates. 5” .' said tilecoetsare Inflated. we will hope things will come in using accepted engineering and you mum”. I new Mm": Regional Court. lane Mitchell leu.’ planning «mm and pracuoes.‘ ' . - - Witm H, maid. “My" tak- said it LRT expert David Cockle The region's ”is million cost Button said. "The cost estimates ing' it to heart. we're m to move in wanted to contribute to the plan estimate for the light rail and bus ' are based on a functional design that no" m - he would have to respond to a rapid transit projects here came level ofdetail and will be refined in Lib board chair Helen my request l'orpropoaohOlFP.) under scrutiny after two experts the future as more detailed mry Cockle “id the region's cost said the out; were up to $20 mil- deeignsarecompleted' , 7 \ Wmn5 planswereasmuchuone third lionperkilometleoverbudget. Wum7 t - :,; . ' O . , ' fiflfia~ “a: a. A 1: I ' \1 , . ‘ if?! 7 5 “ ”‘i‘; . ‘_ ‘ _ . 41 .- / I,” ‘_.... .7 W399 ne‘s 1,: a ' ' t t y l ' - » ' a\e“\\ "‘3' "a .‘ ' â€" ‘ 1 i K , . \| GEN A '._{=".t-';m 1" , . t " * " ti“? " v .5 may): a _ ‘ ' . O ’ _ "‘“" ‘ m~‘~w_ , ’ "5 - , napkin-umuuln-lu, mummmm . . t. “919-1 a“; ,4 _ 3;. .L________â€"______,i, , c, ,,,,_,i .- _, l

Powered by / Alimenté par VITA Toolkit
Privacy Policy