The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

, , ’7W - mm-mwramw ‘ Cominued In pm ”new - ment. whlc la providing up to number: including large land - M'EGW“ tions because it is combined $265 million in funding for the aoquiaition coats. the new trandt P I I II I? I l ._. LRT/Tig‘itll h red 8 narrating” Mttailcanooat hubtwoblock:(awayflornthean- ~ ‘ ere ares a costs.‘ ut- as a millionpcflornetre. mm WHASI- - ‘ » W a.” ton [rigid ed (be we I, W while bus rapid Hanan. phoned for tion. high highway and utility ‘ “numb "In I“ u in V" MthMmttinpncy H, ‘ as provided to the Chronicle by fuming and «new lnciud- {we .5} some SAW? W available Button, wasfitfomillbn incontin-r edinun'coata §I gig-‘5 gency costs. a ut six per cent 0 a The region’a budget includea ‘- 5|9.143.|9|4 thecost of the total project. ( unada $10 million in property ncquhl- if Iii “III“! . “"10. - Mmrdingtoteaealdlcondua- In mmmflbnbrufllityreba- ‘% lo SEE ed by the Chronicle. many LRT the cost Of tion and $48 million in contin- " mm” 3° "V" W- W M“ building light rail ”3%., an...” on... inCaIgary,a$l.4 billion project maybe In m Mummmm WWW-W00." was two per cent. or $35 million expertiu for such projects. oon- - , m o, "I. M ; over budget at year's end and as mac as tribtmngtoooatoverrum. ‘ expected to he at least six months 40 t 50 I n 'Conaultanta for a transit proj- “other! “mam" “a.” 1 mm 0 PW?"- ww-bowzmmome m ”an In Toronto. a project most total price ofammitprojethhua recently ranked the most expen- it is in their interests to inflate KW-OIC mm-Em _. sive infrmtrueture project in Cana- - Mnlcnlmlohn-ton costs.” he said. 'Aa we have very va. ' da by infrastructure magazine Memberoldreuyunau fewrealeapertsinCanndaandthe Wlmm “mum ReNew Canada â€" the Eglinton- muses-indoor U.S.. with modern ”(It moat light Scarborough Crosstown LRT line rail projects are planned by engi- mum minimum-Immune 1 â€" came in at $8.2 billion after sub- nears who use very dated building 219 W St. N_ Wok) o 519.747.8123 stantial design changes when ‘ tediniqueaandpnernllydeaign to ' Mayor Rob Ford took office modem railway standards and. by In Portland and Wisconsin. Cambridge. could run as low as so ovum Edit rail proj- projects were commissioned for as $100,000 per kilometre. ecu. greatly drive up coats of con- 3: 1 little as $15 million per kilometre. By those low estimates. the sanction ’2 3 Cockle said. region's project for IS Itm of m 'ln Canada. the cost of building Button said the region was and 17 km ofBIU‘would run about [Uri rail may be inflated as much ~_- learning from the successes and $96.7 million. as 40 to 50 per cent. compared to "' J." failures of other projects in its According to (Jackie's examina- similar European light rail proj- ' -' plans for the system here. tion of the region's plan a number ecu.’ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ 7 t. as "-1’ “x; E???” 33*: ‘ .. y. ' ‘ «I *%‘--*3at;&2 “" “25 "réé- - ' fig "firs.“‘ézfi , ~ 2:“ , ‘ . ”legiffg ‘ ::“::’»‘?’- ’7“ KW Foot ‘ 7' .9331? -~ ” , ‘ I Ml h » . ‘. TFSASpodal ~ .' . I . ' * IE / Vim/L _ .10% . ‘ * ‘1 J i L , ‘ g . I j 33 ”It“ \ “muvwm v g . y g f \ int-mum Id. v 1.3%.}: ‘x , 7 v . . ,. 1-. .1?! a”. - \ ‘r ,\ when. ,I "_ ,5“? 21 - your local ' " serum 8 “ harm-Io. Speaallzmg In All M, LIVER PM! mom. 4.99.. \ ”WM" , EUROPEAN AUTOMOBILES m m summons“: “*W'V'Wm'"; .__â€"_________ W . “om he! with Ab today and discus‘ 5 your , Mancunian with my“: can trust. DealerAutimed by ”m' "5‘ M mo am “new... A. Mercedes Benz, BMW. Milli mm 9,, g â€"_â€"â€"â€"m an "mm mm W. Ml. Nissan ,3.29 n. .359 a. SEWING BEEF rm ~_'4.‘9 n R local 1 secure I trusted ”minions Restoration u u W‘ a“ g. _â€"“__""‘â€"_ » mummy.” 51.8.6..thth W'MMMM \â€" . . ”in..." “ IthacCIlcheaMaW'h-F‘ m WWW-It WhMM'M" m-qauharty-ul! 51/ “WNW . ~ ‘ _, , 2 519-573-2052 2- .. WWW-"1w » . l â€"‘ ,#, ,,