The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

a - WATHtiot ) commie”: - Wednesday. October is. 20” rum-m \‘i V Sun: 20 ‘ “alt‘tlut.()nlanu VI] ll“ c g a t "'4 ,oz : ~________-2 ”MM” “ ”h " Tl * to it l||'(i\I( ii «on KAJlL‘flthhfl‘llltlt’Ad 7% l H h . \ 2.22l l'etcr “IVkl l R ' l'l Ill l\lll R SCOUl APPLES & GIRL GUIDE \ Il)llHR|\l . l- l COOKIES NOTHING TASTES BE‘ITER ll)llt)R m :3: “' editorialm Mdh‘lltkklllflhlsll‘ ca THAN A GUlLT REE IREAT'S' sl‘l‘n\f‘l K\Jlt‘lltk\llft‘ltl\lk' sit ' litres-[)1 s\lli\l) . q tit/t ‘ Kl PORN-Rest :in Un't'-.: if :"llt‘sll‘rl‘llxila uatcilnut 'ituiin lt‘ ca l~ .. h“- ~ _ - -...:- ~ “ . - . as ' - a at that”. l Rt it . E 2...;th kll't)Rlch\t 11‘ g Eggâ€"4“: ! tt‘ttit‘?\s.itcili~mhtutntl: ca . ‘ ; '-: é" N ' ‘ ': 1:: t , ’ ‘ , \l)\lkl|\l\tt -, fl _ t \\ \ (tutu \i\i‘iitt m :m ,4 r .,’ ; U; ‘ ~ ' .t v 2 / â€"_ kit\iis.\ltssi\\\t;ik ‘ d â€"‘ ,3.) ~ .‘ . % » 2 can u a..ii‘rt.“:u.inttit- a. ____ a}. 2' ] awr- ' "I; . ‘\\ , II: are ‘13-, , :- t , _. [5/3 - , . so I ski I‘Rl st \l \ll\l s g/ g I}. 1“,} -» "~-»- ,~ ‘ T) 9,. 7' 2,294 is; , ff “mi/"us? ‘4'” {7%} E! E that 'Httlll ’3’ if "I 3-, ' 1W" 1 ,. s'.p_-' t. at mt... fits}: ) ‘\ h h'if s ‘ 3t 5 Hand ‘\\.llt\lliikll!ttlll_ c ta 5. .R ‘ \‘“ q: {f A t ’ ‘ t" 1‘ l?“ $.\\ 3. h;\\ a «5‘ ’ » I 4‘ L" “a m H mm :2: :«r‘ 1'). tr: .. as. § . a: a E . “tendons iMtllk'lltl‘K'lft‘lltclt' ca ‘ A, U J A!‘ J' .E~ ‘ r.‘ ‘ ' 1" v \_ l a . . 5‘ _ if, _ ., ‘5 .‘I . tl\ssttltl) ~ K K"... t . .5 . . ~ «w ms QM ’ V‘ ' 1" "I: - ,'_‘ _‘ a.“ a |Rt ll \ll(i\ ‘lvxvijmont It; 1 . \ tit.ltll.lll l’iihlic.itit~ti~ \latl \iles . . ' I I walk 3 t l‘tshlww-n uremic"! \mtil‘s‘r (AIIRONICLE EI)IT()RLXL l lme to walk the JtItsiu‘s ____.____â€"_2___J ltxlt‘lltallttlldl \tandard Natal sum How about a sal cap? I'm not entirely sure why 1' ' ' lions unchecked. I presume m \sssustz on. my 0 (he (2in of Waterloo even I l lil ]\ l there Will be a nutIpber of t - ‘ . f. w 1110: , . - - V '. . . re retful voters int ecom- \tl tutti ( tf u an t eve seen them used m pmfc“mna] sports for bothered to form the tilt l) \l( l g ‘ ' . . A . ~ - - .1 lens budget task force. t munity. who are kicking ”1.6 years. so perhaps its time that munitipa N I b tau“ [In task themselves after voting for _ l tnploytts also hate a salarx t In . f h . . d ed . v those apparently committed » ”out mind its ll were being a little facetious here. ("C9 35‘” P") “C mean .. , , _ W i“ ' l - c . , ingful results but because to fiscal responslbIlIW and AW , Apparently were ntit the only ones if llI_\‘ counuls reat , ‘7 _ ~ - "l ’ - , l V h' ‘ ; other such delightful catch- J‘ 2.22;; lion to the t‘tti/rtis' budget task force recommendations “‘5 .(()ul‘l(,l dPPd“ f" l as . ‘ 1 v t . . i. . v v v no interest in taking the thaSESi ll“ \alerlimt lttw'ttist‘ ls ,‘ut uishtd “i“ it") lllLllCélllUll. d f h . h d k l _ l Good on [he budget [ask “ “" “M"“l‘” 5’ “‘"MIJ'"! llie group was formed out of an election promise bx pro “(I ” l C" 3" “'0" l . , , V . . . WWW")?! m \l' ‘or Br ~nd't ll'illorin to ive citizens tnore say on the ‘0 heart. ‘ l force for VO'Clng what cm ‘ a" L ‘ ‘ ‘ g . - ‘ , , _ ' » . Monday the task force 1 b ‘ residents are thinking and nsi \thrl'kl ss t tit V II annual (’Il\‘ budget process. We think it was done With a n t . k’ . k b r K I’ Hi. «not K t m o it t Home“ « ' . ~ . , h» » * .. .. ld presented five recommen. 1 la mg a ris x presen ing « ‘ ‘ ” -~ - - nudge and a mnk that people (int c tommittct Viou _ 2 ,. ‘ . . ,1 Elie mum“. l’resxt tuna “hull Wt, [N howchallenging” isto balance the budget a, the datitinstoctmnctl. lhe three l PAIGE . budget recommendations u"l~lilt‘l~ dllll‘lldlnls Jfidlfl‘l ttietn I . ‘ , , ‘ _ most controversial ideas ‘ DESMOND l W'Hh some teeth. . . . , ‘ ., . t‘itx. forcingtlietn toconsitler annual tax increases ' , , l t .. ' . ’ . htt l.y_ As‘l iptt \llt imaplatm , . ‘ .7 , ' , _ .- _ H 2-. > _ W , J (.I "(ll dcs "e a” , . . , . . addressed issues mam rest I V COU , P . may new opinww .tdscr‘tsttig or But the politicians didnt expect the tin/ens thosen . . . . _ . _ ‘ - . d . ‘ ; await t huuld mu m liken . mt- ,mgh. “math do “i, n "I” “m and to do mu“, dents have repeatedly L‘l’lll‘ everywhere deserves fair its protestations uring .. . i - - - > , , _ ~' --r ‘ . ' sation for the work budget meetings about . “‘ “W" ‘ ”WM“ “""f'l‘m‘ ~ ‘ s ho it bud et )rtortties. Unfortunately. "led "‘3 “d“ “’mlnn‘” tompen . . _ i mm be brought In Immm he“ [31‘3" (k_:ll“.“"“”a t I) llll(‘lgln8"" 1" levels seem to he tion, the MPI and the need they do A whether its at betng ready to make tough . I ‘ "J“ “ 3‘ "“‘“‘ “w“ "m" l ‘ mu“ “fig m l” ‘ ‘ ‘ fora culture shift at city hall McDonald's or the (Iitv of decisions, could learn a i I ' in limintu ti\ \tfilt ll-‘ struggling With these days. ‘ , . . . W t l ' thin or two from the citiv : " ll lt \' 'l ’ w 'r- th- su ) osed tti look at limiting towards an ambitious. effiâ€" a er 00' g ‘ ‘ tiit'tkit HI ”I I H ‘ st t ( U lP . - - ~ . (icncv culture And let’s face it. city zens‘ task force. , ’ , . , , tax increases or bringing the city‘s unfunded liabilities '. ’ ' _.n . d . 5 l . t . ‘ [h h lh .~ . . , . t ., . . . . » .e s is s - ~ ' - - [hi “mm“ )3 m“ WNW“ I“ under control Without looking at its biggest operating I t l ' ' fly the recon] counci 0'" ont run UH“ I 1" no as oug u I"“""“"' l“ “’f‘"‘“h‘ """ "”‘ M . . mgndatinm weren't exactly stalfdo. recommended mass layoffs . “at «its fur git-maul nun titlllllk‘r npt'nst- 7 salaries and wages at City ball. ’ ‘ . , I ’ 1 ’ . . .. l 1 . rs . welcomed With open arms. (.ouncils max vote and and pat deductions. lnSltd( it“ WWW" “1 ”W" ”NV" Us \taff remuneration makes up almost .n per tent of (‘ t n illt r including make the decisions but staff they said ‘hev maybe we | ' lt‘st'f'tt'ul and uirtiitwn ial Us" is pro _ . . . .' v , ‘k . l -. ‘ . ,0 I C ) S, ‘ - ~t , - n . tliost ttists and unltss toutitil or l mu 1 ll t t tits cttt . . _ . M m to make am “w . r um ’ (I L torti-holdstheline it mllintreisleeverx‘year Mal")? Brenda llalloran who produce and present the should look into this. maybt ‘ "‘~“““"‘ W“ "‘u“ "N "hm" m" A nlh'd" 'h , . fl , m" the ide'iof 1 “11"“. (L! , advocated for the task force’s information all of those we can make some changes """"“""“"‘r‘c"“"“"" "WWI“ , f.“ “. l" N Kl" " ( . ‘ ‘ ‘ ' ‘ l' f . ‘. « “j, K' 1 decisions are based on, I that benefiteveryonef” . , | ‘k h . ormati in. ant t on. aret new luv hint-m mtormanun out [he NBA is currently undergoing a tit out on i [ll ‘ _ 2 2 . . . ‘ f ‘f h ; up it a whim.“ tam Wanton In] lil i “rm," ”1.311“. they're trying to cap players Sctan who said at a prCYItJUs‘ have no doubt Staff «it If!" The (3* 0N0 1 "01 "lg . I l\! in tt- “u “as“ \l s smit- ‘ “ .i ‘ ' ' . , ,' . budget meeting that council (7in ofWaterloo work hard, else, has presented council I ‘ . wages at 3.! per cent of total revenue Waterloo taxpayers . v t. h h h . . . t n \\ tit-am 1mm“ \J «it- "I I.“ I“ k iftht tould u a“ “n“ dtal n‘av have to make some But at the end of the day. mt a test. w et u it was I “u I , y - - x , 6', l .91” , . lt‘ l unpopular political deci- when it comes to City consuousornol. 1 i 1 ll its m it It x ll stall doesnt like that per taps t itxt l t tti wot Ill . _ . . ‘ , _ , , H i u t l m in u not l mm tr» w I l “'1 ot ‘. N ad “fun ht , in I” in Wm r 2 sions to balance the budget. sdlanl's there art defililtlly In coming months vu t t i l‘ ['1 t s t . ‘ t ' H .v u n I ‘ I t ‘ . . ~ ' mm c toll name ~immin- ...iam. |“::”‘;}I:‘:‘:;LI “if; killdfn but “unfi‘m‘ifgm olm’ouslv ; showed Visible [(-ststiincu some questions to beasked. Will see if council truly has I at.» tt‘lt'phsitk‘ minim warm“ and . ‘t g. ‘ 1 It seemed there was far How far do we go? what it takes to get the citys i 7‘ l;1"""1“"Mn“"1"":(‘TTJ'1‘Z'IIYT‘Ia: d" n l intire concern Wllll making Do we allow staff comr finances back on track. . w, Mm, 34:; w“ M w M... , v. ‘ ~ , 3 my stafftnad than there was pt nsatton to t onttn‘ut We Wlll sec if the budgtt l u. n at trsrtxrll’tt‘tiphttiit‘lltl an .7 m 6' > - - l with digging in to the fan climbing? Should salaries task forces creation was in“, mm mt tunlttl‘nitit-n t... - ~w‘ ‘3? ~ . ~ , = ~~ ;‘ vl ’ ‘ , l '( in l‘n's‘lllnn make tip 65 or To or 85 per merely a puhltctty stunt. | “1‘“ I“ sa aries ant ( ) p . ' g . ““ “ “' W: 1“”l"“"<IL‘L‘L'TFE In"! “E. i t d. 1’ . ~ 1 make up nearly ht) per cent cent ofa ('IIVS budget? intended to give the appear ‘i t‘ ‘ 4 it t A I it M M . ' . . . l'iliuhdrtr‘ii’illn vii ram." ' ' ’ . ll II "I” r tifthe budget I think we can all agree ance of fulfilling election t. w i ttt‘tltiithtnmclc . .i wt to man ‘ y n it? 7 v . 3 3‘ . * ' I will be the first to stand that is unrealistic. promises. We W'lll see if task ‘3" NM,“ “ism'r'h-‘h‘ 3W?" . if“: - 33$?” ' MW up and say that every If city counnllors feel it's force members' hard work [,,..‘..,,.y..:'gi\lm,, MM . M“ .. . 7 “hath. . - . > . > “ - employee of every business realistic lo leave those ones» was all for naught. g ' l a k