The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

l I 4 ' WA'l‘hRLUO CHRONICLE - Wednesda , Se umber 28. 201 l ' i‘ Council [)0 es “The efforts to develop crossing at proper cross- . . ' against ”91;” shade in that area will be walksor pedestrian islands. frustrated." Coun. Diane Freeman \ ' Lo 3 E A MO sidewalk to The installation of side- said the city is supposed to preserve walks mdwwagléfwaypzvrfrt; be trying to preserve its tree support st as o canopy. mature trees promoting Waterloo's com- “We’re trying to rebuild * plete streets Eighty. anddthe curd shade canopy. Freeman 3“, DEMO promotion 0 etter pe es- sat . Ostrich 5mg“) trian and cyclist infrastruc- Coun. Mgrk Whalethlho m ture, represents e ward an as _â€" __W_ . M__ . _e_, , ,_ ., . esidents of Allenby “ ‘ . championed the idea of W ITH Court won't use? _ We need more keevingthe trees. firemen! mature trees on err - - was an Issue not to over- 0 properties cut down as pan connectivity SO looked. o a; a development plioject, people have more ‘(BridVg/Eisl) a verg btltsy a ter a city counci vote - : street.” a ey sai .“ t's chalce. I m not - Monday. dangerous for kids to cross City staff recommended prepared to cut “With respect to the FI N A N 6' N G to council that a walkway - walkway. I just don't think and sidewalks on one side of out mklng it's safe.” x - . .._.-.. WW“ fishâ€"”.4" . .s_s _, “-33“. trite filbelmmuedasggn connecnons that Coun. Jeff Henry diS- ...m. ,, , , , . _ N“ _ ,.__-..._ o t e eve opment at 0 - agreed. '13,. A,“ , éggs‘ . a x .; .1: and2948ridge St. all” my? ” "We need more connec- ~~.§2;.;;;w: ’ . Aft? a leggthy defies“; pedesmans time. ghvity sogeople have more 3:1; " ink-p 3‘; v.,“§‘;;‘-:‘ ‘1 ‘ .._.:- 33‘. :2, gear. - _. ‘ ,5 . ‘ . counc vote against t otce. enrysal . “ 'm not ‘.‘. *" .;3<*,ja’{ :13 ' ‘ 1‘ .7} g“; I a , the sidewalk and walkway, -(‘mm.leflHenry prepared to cut out making ,wisfinance '- f; 4 but approved the develop- 0" p”"‘""°"‘d""’“"‘pla" connections that will save “ ' ‘ » ment project which will see pedestrians time.” k ‘ l. ‘ 3 10 single detached homes ~ Installation of sidewalks While the current council E y ' ‘ 9 ‘55? built in the cul de sac ofthe on one side of the street voted not to implement ; f A . ’ street. would have meant removing sidewalks. director of devel» L “U ' ‘ I I. Neighbourhood resident about a dozen mature trees opment services. Cameron _‘._; 3%??sz j 1 _, 'fz‘s‘JDACIu‘Q‘V . Ted Oldfield, representing on residents' front lawns. Rapp said the decision #3:“: 23’" few 3:; a}; ) .. jg: ; .. . - ’ ‘ eight midents, pleaded with Area residents and members would not bind future coun- * ‘ "9‘33" .41, “' " ' ’ ’ council to remove the of council also expressed cils “ i143: . “".3.§37“‘""m; ‘ "w V " ‘ "' ""1? LEXIS; ~, ' pedestrian amenities. concern about the walkway Councillors Melissa Dur- JP}? “-12%: _ ., LL§ . . ‘ ;, . . fiv'iéégi'w» “We have spent 20 to 25 encouraging youth to cross rell. leff Henry and Angela yearsgmwingtreesonfituen. Bridge Street at the walk~ Vieth voted against the . ’5. w _ by Court," Oldfield said. way’s exit as opposed to motion. ' ssh 73 13mm I: IF: He'd “" i _, p.) . \ v ~ \ ~« and; M p 5,: , _' :2: ,. " ' i f.» -" , ' , __L‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ â€"â€"7 v is T ;::; = ,3: «v . I \ . s gs . See where your a; m , 2:33;” ‘ £1, .1‘ s . arba 9 ace! 57““ ' .51"? ‘.g g 9 ~ L: w A, "w r“. 9...“ ; £17 »; 2‘...” ..._‘._ V v j . . ”7’ "NM _-"; :‘ .03»: . ‘3“u' (<5 . ““2155 in 3,“: // V b , .; J» u t; ‘ 4/! . A - | . l u is, 5*" ‘Y‘ , A . A” at as: W E: . we; \ no» - so ,. L5.“ . - ,. w: an? a“? ” V ' / .3 F . _ . flu}; , "5"}: as. M s L .» x 3:14" . ‘1 w , " I .. it » es ; ‘ , . . - ‘7 I l ; ' :2? u 7 (I ... 27"?" I ’- - 9' - f s m Nth- (1 Dy w WJIlt'riwi C"- . ' ' > North! m1 '4 Ptovksrtlv Ait'l.l"‘-‘1li'HHlflPLISHHl‘ F‘ , “ ‘ ‘ “ ‘ ‘ A :_ " ’ 519-884-3660 ,1 g ' E , va» M. Jilin Rut,” [lei F’ruu- llw‘w ‘wvww I ' ' . www.regionofwaterloo.ca/waste