Waterloo Public Library Digital Collections

Waterloo Chronicle (Waterloo, On1868), 22 Sep 2010, p. 8

The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

a - WArenuoo Cir-0mm - Way. September 22‘ 20 l o ’ ZNW‘cberSl N.Surte20 N I ‘ Waterloo. (Mano NPJ Hill I *[Wbtloltilu Fax ”9386918! Peter WINKLER . l'l‘lllJSHER . I-.I)i'Ii)RIAt. LIGHr RA'L BAHI . Huh VRBANAC ‘ H)i'l‘t)R ext 329 editorial@walerluu‘hmmcle ca \pumlmwarerlotxhrmiclc ca -. . . ‘ 5 Charlotte PRONG PARKHlLL '. , . ”5T F‘NE RhPORTER ext. 203 _ tprnngiewaterlmthmcle cu » ‘ . I, ' ' , (in-g MACDONALD ‘ . g . . ‘ ' ! REPORTER ext. 215 . gdmacdrmaldfluareritxichrnriickxa » {x < " ADVERTISING I) at J ‘ ‘ J - Gerry MATI'ICE ext. 230 ' , RETAIL SALES MANAGER . , fl ~ Mowwaierlorthnicleca a/ I I? h ' , fl - u \ 1 I ,», a *. , : SALES REPRESENTATIVES ‘5 _ 1’ . A ‘ 4,? t . x. E” ‘ Heather BOYDexI 221 ~ ‘1 - “ ‘ . 1 h ‘v ‘ la 9 '3 htmytltd'waterltxvchninrclc ca / 3‘ ‘1 ‘ \ . ‘ -_- ‘1 ‘ ‘ . I .. U NonnuCYCAexLZZ} 2,3” .-. (“an ,- .‘ I , ’ v' I. Ikycuklwatcrltnchmmvlc ca 3.5% . w I," ah I it . W W_i_\nchEHLexI 228 â€"' y - - ‘ “fl. ’ ‘~._ 1" * urtehl@‘waterlumhrumclexa _ _“ - ‘ ’9: a a I .v . .; § 7K_ ’ , I 5'2” N ‘40.?! ' ‘ " .’£’ '13:?" ' CLASSIFIED up .r a. '3‘ 73,1“, “b a“ _. a J , s waosszm "you?! J" " ‘ ' CIRCULATION ~ .__-_ ‘|9»88(»2830 ext. 211 F“ ,, “mun” W ,_h,*_ . wikfihem -EV - ill ' Canadian Publicatiom Mail Salt-s , , V I . . V ‘ . Vote es swim... L (I IRONILII. H)l l()Rl,»\l. THISI us and 40050478 "7- ~ ,,,-.-,-_,, ,, . - . 7' .. . . . International Standard Serial Num~ Le . the Station rust us is a slogan that ' Gems will be addressegegomg her ASSN 0832â€"34“) aVlng has gone out of favour m Nil“ '\ forward and Y“ can _ 5‘!” Audited Circulation: 31.292 . f wirhalorof politicians . that the taxpayers of this city m .56" or "(Pt to sell. that was the question aced by ' That's because an \\ ( H” l l 89‘ "‘9 proper representa» “3 W Citycouncd on Monday regarding the historic train informed and engaged citi- tion defending their inter- .... 5‘32")" oh R g a SIM“ unry will greet any of those ests ‘ .t .. This is an issue that has dragged on betweenltwo ‘ pes of claims with a In fact, there is no com< W 3...! council terms with the previous one deferring a decrsion h); a1 thy dose of skepticism ”I: miiment except for a motion â€"'."- to continue to lease, or to sell the asset to a local clothier. ‘ * passed by the present city The Waterloo Chronicle is published - So how do you respond to . a} . ' . each Wednesday by Mumhnd The argument forwarded by supporters ofa sale said Let's Talk “v.5 launch of the . councrl that a second refer- Media Group Lu there was an option to buy.In the original agreement official yes side for the if - endum will have to be held Paul Puncher entered into With the crty In 1995 â€" when u coming merger question before Waterloo would be ONTARIO PRESS COUNC‘L the land was called surplus and the uptown wasn’t In as p . . bal ofiicially mergered with the 17.“ WWW” Chm” '5 €me great of shape as it is now. on7the Oct. 25 municrpal â€" BOB City of Kitchener sfrrmimmmfiiffgmi wmch‘rcnh The fact that it has become the vibrant destination let-When pressed they have WAC But present council can't her newspapers Any complaint spot it is today is because of the Vision of some fonvard- no formal position on hold the next one to honour- " am" new ”mom “mums " thinking businesses like Paul Puncher’s Meris Wear. and whether they'd like to see the this latest debate they’re ask~ ing that stipulation, so that Emiflflflrfigifd‘mpi‘irgfi it was an obligation that must he paid. said Coun._ [an City ofWaterioo merged with ing citizens to agree carte should be one of the basic can he ”hush. ,0 0mm, pm; McLean during both this councrl term and the prevrous the CityofKitchener. blanche to a set of discus- questions we ask fwd?“ Council. 2 Carlton Street, Suite one. . . . f sio without tellin us what municipal candidates or is I706. Toronto. ON . M58 I13 But the other two holdovers from last council. Couns. sumiggg'hethgfingg‘géife the? mi El“ cost mil who is upcoming Mon. COPYR‘GHT Ian dAilly and Mark Whaley remembered how dmswe a who have already come to going to be sitting at the Where do you stand on a 11.: comm or [hls nwsvapcr m potential sale was the first time. and seemed to echo their own conclusion that a table. merger with Kitchener? And pmtected by copynght and may be those concerns this time. . . megacity is l er than a city Talk about inertia. People ' do you support a mm ref. Nd only for Pena“! "mfm- The uptown has changed even Since the last time that with more than 150 years of already complain about the erendum to secure "g :31 whim: 0:11:02:ng tight? 3 this issue was raised. Should the city sell off a heritage proud civic heri snail's pace of change from Even better. we know this "M ~ ' ' ' 7 '38?- . , . . . h'b”°d' T0 m“ 3"! “5‘ 0' "“3 property that [F was drawtnga ”at!” income from. The usual suspects are on our mumcrpal governments tssue ISM ““38 much “30 material you must first obtain the It was Similar to the provrncral debate about the the list __ members of Clti- Could you imagine what will tion at the door mm people WWII-“'0" of the WM of It»: can» LICBO and whether it should sell off that asset for a one- zens for Better Government gm done in the he“ four more concerned about their righlB‘féxvfurther iahmtglxnéznx; time gain, or keep it for a continual bump to the bottom and others who originally years when both city staffs taxes and water bills that Ian‘ mam. I on a - â€" . Chromch 279 we?” 5“ N~ 5“" line. - a « - said that we didn't need a are tasked to Stan this navel have 8‘?“ UP ‘8‘“ than ““3 20 Waterloo. 0mm Nu ms, The reality is in this case the current tenants Icould plebiscite to decide the 'ng experiment. rate ofrnflatlon. have argued they wouldn't continue the relationship for- f f h‘ t l b t gmwm there be full public We could all solve it once lâ€"H'IERS POLICY d h ' uld h n t it would et “We 0 t ‘5 8’“ C W u . . . . . ever.an t ecrtywo ave oguaranee s - {the - and forallbysaying N0 "l I r it. can: a contain the - ~ are all behind this latest pro- disclosure of all 0 nego “fixing." “I; “lg-11h“ future revenue. But there IS also an opportunity lost tiations? How will the public October. But then wehave [0 my Went-0M "um,“ Adam ”a when the City'sells offtts heritage Without asking If there powAnd how could you dis- have their say in preserving get everybody to agree With ”“me "um maxed?” f: are any other Interested buyers. agree with something that the civic culture that makes the result and that 30 per ~ mg not \ . i . g v; My : . up» - . _ _ , . . ' _ £351.32?" Kim will novinbe with- it?» ym‘ - K: n «m , . “an”, .55?“ 255$ E} j” ‘ , Simply asks for a discussion. this a city they decrded ‘0 cent or the POPUIKUO" ”I”? M” W ”W“: "muted“ cm 2457 If“ ., , ' _' ' . ~' 2.? “.' > o ttfié}; 3S You can't get much more rea- settle in. raise a family and SENS the “"11 5)! the maionty dense or reject any contrihution for ' h";- ;‘ifii§@fir ' .. Svfi“f”{:"%‘é:ig :4 ;. sonable than that. mold? omeerlooscrumns $234231: Tmlhf'askaofiyt 5,4;k 2' i’*Â¥*’-“-fl’&v‘!'*"'"""‘ ”*‘J’?“‘;} 2; Our society is based on None of those things are BUt they 5“” 35k “5‘ '0 m ‘ ml whit to canon: ' it 3:31;» Â¥t1~ . $412!: byes-v .».f~Ԥv‘«_\".' reasoned debate, with the in place, nor has there been vote blindly for something ‘ . . Ai»s.."i'§;.~»' ’ ' ~¥“‘1.‘é~‘3€s,3§¢ ., ,. .. § . d l i h regardless. It‘s only a discus- IWM‘CHWMMM‘.” M h, m... ., “3%,; .«g, 5‘s“. 9' v" , ,4 w-»,- 91" facts In place to make an any me e suggest ng ow l ft ll h h f | or delivered in Waterloo Chronicle. fig“. 2.“‘\ ““1. Z {23% L .33 on “bright.” . v 9; 5 I“ informed decision they should be structured. S on a 8' a . 0W arm u 5333353”? sum 20, “mm ml“? , :3. ' {grid ,.3;?Â¥l‘;}:3iwiffi‘vié.,r-i’2‘.-.§a But wait a minute here. In But trust us. those con- 00““ that be?

Powered by / Alimenté par VITA Toolkit
Privacy Policy