The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

,7 i W , , W I l 52- mtt HItx)(.Hfl()Nl(_l£-Wnfliksdly. Februan, [(1th l ,,.,-.Wm. .__... . . a. E l ' ’ t ?? l t 13 ; THE CITY OF ‘ ‘ ‘ l l i to l t ; 0 ‘3 tn '5 m t i i o- t l . i- N c Q C i i w v (1- oâ€" l 5 in ID > : l 3 .- l O W < - O 0 l l ' â€" l . . t ' 0" r*lat >dt btl t -, N r . ‘ 11:11an and th ~ trunk san~ l PubI'c N Ice: ILFVLSCQ‘WL’I tjwhinhln2rtl)muel:::l1pro;imitv olihese prot t n I , » L i , f i t Publ'c Informat'cn cent” eels. the) have been combined to provide a comprehen- ’ I _ l Class EnVImnmental sive approach to the stream talley and to recognize elli- l r , . ciencies iii timing, cost and stall resources Fhe Stud). l ‘. Assessment _ Area is slut“ n on the map : 5 Laurel Creek And Sanitary The Prom l ' ' £981“:- mnk sewer The Study “Ill be in accordance With the Municipal Engi- l O ’73:}? 325:": . neers‘ Association document entitled “Municipal L'lass i ‘- «any; The Study .V , _ lath)": ‘ ' _ , ‘ ‘ . ‘ , ,. «V Em irunmental Assessment October 2000‘ as amended in l A ,-'5 ~ "51'" The( ity ot Waterloo is proceeding “Ill! 4 Schedule B 30”, Th , ('l' g FA ‘5‘ I lud . bl ‘ and r‘xi’vv . } - :1" ‘ Class lznxironmental Assessment (EA) Study to examine ” _ ‘ 7, ‘ L ll: ; [prm‘LT ":C 6:338”:le ~s Zn“ ‘ Laurel (‘reek rehabilitation (from Marshall Street to l3ni- dg‘m} consu‘ d K n. an eva ua ion 0 a d c ‘ . y ‘ ‘ .. , , , ‘ assessment ot the impacts ot the proposed alternatives. 1 versit) Avenue at Hwy K5] and sanitary trunk sewer . d d *nt n H [I t“ t" -d l [I m upgrade options (from Marshall Street to the Sewage d" I L I “I on 0‘ d pre are 50 u k ' l _ Treatment Plant '51 Pt) in [m- City ot‘Waterloo, [Tpon completion ot this Study. an Environmental Study I . . ‘ V . ) s - v 1 i 1 I V 9 The Laurel sanitarv trunk sewer between Marshall Street Report ([ 5R. documenting the process mll m wbmde ‘ ~ . ’ V » to the Mtntstrv ol the l:n\ironment tMOh) and wrll be and the Sewage Treatment Plant is the largest pipe in the . 4 t i H 7 ‘ _ i ‘ available tor public review tor a period of 30 calendar system conveying wastewater flows trom the entire area d' N ’ west of Highway 85 into the ST? This pipe has been iden- A) , tilted as requiring improv ements’ to improve the capacity Public Information (‘entre o m Ollhls portion ot‘the system The l’omell trunk sewer in m the point in the Study tbetore any dectsions are made ' - c this area also requtrcs improvement to protect the integrity on a recommendation or acceptance ofa preferred con- “ " ot‘the pipe where it crosses under Laurel (‘reeki cept) all interested parties are in\ ited to attend a Public Q o .2 ln addition to the trunk sewer works. there is also an Information ( 9“er tl’lt't MCC‘mS- .The purpose of the ‘ opportunity to remediate laurel Creek through Hillside meeting “l" he ‘0 "“9“ alternative solutions and the l Q 0 ‘ Park, The (reek channel through this reach is experienc~ proposed methodology to be used to evaluate them. l * int: accelerated erosion which has necessitated emergency ”W “99””? “l” h“ M“ l 0 w erosion repairs where infrastructure such as trails and sew - Wednesday February l7, 20l0 t ers has been at risk A long~tcrm stream rehabilitation Lincoln Heights Public School tin the library) ‘ c z approach is required to both enhance the natural em mm» 270 Quickfall l)ri\e l * a ment and protect the infrastructure 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. l a t\ Municipal (lass lamironmental Assessment tt'lriss l »\i We are interested in hearing any comments that you may l c m is rcqutretl to intestigate environmental. technical social haw about the Stud) t to. ot Waterloo and \‘tantec ( or» l u c and econoiiiit opportunities and constraints for options \lllllltg stall \Hll be present to discuss elements otthe § a a- r _ 7 K , , _, , 7 protect and to tinsucr questions I I \\ ith the exception ot personal fi = I E 0‘.an _-" llllilrmullttn. all comments will 1 - u 0 .~ ‘ g 'o' become part ot the public record > L g _ _ _ ‘ _ . ' a C.» It you are unahle to attend and 0‘ t O l ' ‘ - ,' gt A . would like to make your \ lL‘\\\ m g ,' (f a "My \/ ltnovtii. please dcltllL‘\\,)|tuT cont ‘ .â€" ‘ .' 4. it D 9/ merits to either «it the l rotect m = 0 l ‘ Team members belovt v a 3 . . , E c 0 C 9 . ¢ 5; ‘ i We Denise \lc(.oldrick -- i k - , . - .~ > OI! ‘ 800 0’59 9% ‘2 a my“ Em Project \lanager Q 0 b ’ 0‘ 05,9 ( HIV ill \\‘.|lL‘tltiti V I L .5 _ “a w 7 1‘ iCi‘ l T‘Vll‘tlli‘tll‘: ttllt;l\ " JlL'rtHl ) l ., "l m 1 £ l ‘ o my”: 9‘ l i - t j â€" W u ‘ ‘ °\ 9 d i P lhtlllc ”I Li.) Aid, I ‘. a!“ w‘ ‘7 3 Q9 1%“ tin H‘WKtifi‘W o c l \ ”l r86 WM AV u g 613 ‘9 i O l ‘ V‘. G" 5’ 7 l mail tlttiisc ititpiililritl i1 \\.IlL‘Y * "- i ' w a 5: 7“ v: ’1 loo . v I ‘ 9% v ; ‘5’ a c t g " t 9% ’ 0‘5 (30‘ Q) «“5?» “E New Brim n‘ “B \. Pine, 8 l i t" " Egg 1“ J“ t ‘9‘ Project \Ianager i n ' S‘tanlct ( otistilting l til .0 h ‘41 C Legmd‘ 4" l tL‘tlt‘l’tch \trcct 0 u i' . ‘ g ‘ Study Area Boundary ‘ . e " “M g - lsitchciicr t LN \lll t~\l 0 ,th ‘ ' " 0 A; , 7 creel: 1L . , .iI'I if“: ‘ a 9 W g - - - - - <sanitary lnnti [sewer Phone ‘N'fli'j‘ul‘ '5! i . 3 a? . a , Lu <l‘J-<7‘)-Hri(i4 a: a l “fig 3. .9 w.) 5' l ltMll slt‘\t‘ hrimii it \l.tlllt‘t t out rm! 5‘ 4 w -