mm... WV. ___.- __E. c , ,, E z - WAI'ERUM) uranium - Wednesday, lanuary 20. 2in l ' ' alr d f ' a] ' h ' ' Opposmon ea y ormmg to am gamatlon pus y, i ’: ‘ if? t BYGREGMACDONMD Kitchener already plans to ask the ionsareon this.†esand she'sh ' \ l ï¬Â¥_)r 01“)an Sta/f _ #_ province to put a question on the ballot in Scian has been post- more beforey‘q‘ , .. s 3 7 l 7 the spring and Waterloo council will decide ing responses on her blog decision. 3. ï¬fth-t} 3 ‘ o matter what the city decides next week Monday whether to endorse that process. at kscian.wordpress.com. 3 But the responses so » when weig‘iingwhether or not to holda The results of Scian's poll have been They range from the . far have already cleared ' 1 referendum on amalgamation. the mixed to say the least. She sent out an e adamant â€" "My answer up one of Scran's con- ‘ debatebalrwdymgmgmthe community. mail to l50 people asking for their views. is emphatically â€" YES!" _ ' - ‘ . cern, which was the lack ‘ 1 No one's more aware of that than Lfoun. and ï¬gures she's heard every opinion in the to "NO for me," to any- a}; of an organized oppost- : Karen Swan, who has been polling her con- spectrumi where in between. . , ' tion. 3 4 i stituents for their views on joining with "It's given me a lot to think about," Scian Some highlights; ‘ 3 A.“ The amalgamation ‘ l Kitchener. said. "it's illuminating how divergent opin- 0 “1 am not opposed to "9 j , debatehwats brrgught tack A l having the question , 3 into t e ore ront y a 3 l 1 -’ _, a;\ asked. 1 think Waterloo group of businesspeople i - - i “x . ~ _ t «_ fl “isâ€; " will voéelovemhelmingly , ' frogter bly khSigh-tech -. â€" -" . " " 3 ~ fl your .' no an 1 en we can put , ea er rm ac on. i . Q ~ “to. - f it?“ 1 this to rest." Scian expressed con- i a l l (x if» lg ’ ., ‘f fl; _ if. . “I do not believe in cern that special interest 7 l 3 ‘ a a? ' ' the near future that groups would dominate g | -_ 4 7:2 , . ' . Waterlooians will say Yes any debate. 1 l _ " â€" a ’ f ’ v to amalgamation while But the emergence of ; 51K Offers an exceptional program ‘ 3“ I; Kitchener will always CounJmdean the website onewater- l “ï¬lmed 0†preparation for university, “asst \ ' ' ' want amalgamation.†loo.ca has proven there ~. ;.ersonalized attention, character y V} f - 1 - “l have been following this and am of will be at least two sides ifan amalgamation l development and extracurricular if? _" ‘ _‘ i. f 3 the opinion it needs to be studied." question is asked, ‘ activities. i if u‘ ' i - “I am wondering who the ‘Community The site was launched Sunday as an _ ' ‘ __‘ " , 2 __ ' leaders' are? I know the business people alternative. grassroots voice for the issue. It ‘ ' if r? E _ 7 ’ ' behind the idea are only interested in busi~ is clearly opposed to amalgamation and , if. r. » H g “g; ’ ' - ~ ‘. ' ness ventures getting more of a profile beseeches visitors to "Keep Waterloo Inde- , I , _ 7 1» _, instead of the well-being ofWaterloo. What pendent.†235335,â€" j’jfï¬xï¬fz'mlo“"""“'" 6 “pm it; 2 ‘i l». is in it forWaterloo?" , 3 The people behind the site declined an 4 Lower Smog! Information Session .....,6:30pm i} } ' All else bemg equa] (eg, I do!“ feel I ‘memew With the Cmomde- ' \ Middle Sthool 'niorrnation Session..,,...7:00pm a; 1 . ‘ ' know what pros and cons would a merger But for Scian, their presence is reassur- l 0mm smooi information Session,..,....7:30pm _. fl, ' y “- bring), I feel normally bigger is better in ing. i ’ A,“ . _ " terms of capacity to deliver services and efï¬~ “I'm starting to see the beneï¬t of putting l i' "e. ciency to do it. For this overall reason. i feel a uestion on the ballot." she said t 0 n Sf i q ' 519_648,2183 ‘ 7 looking more into a merger is a good idea Councillors will debate asking the amal- K ‘1 no k F , , k h l " and to not consider it further would be gamation question during Monday’s council 1 mar C “ “Vi-5] 5C 00 Uri-i CESl crazy.†meeting. 6:30 pm. in council chambers. To S C H 0 O L '""' "M For the rest. see Scian’s blog. register as a delegation, contact the city brim-ii nullllli s him i “M’HL Vim-ital Minn“: mil, .in.i»rifu~ with wimp tflidlill «Lulal‘lc Scian has received in“ under 40 respons- clerk's emce' llll |.l\lvl\<i l\-l‘ll'l\l'l\l \iiiiitvi I\ ()ll\ (unxnxtii. r.-...-.-.-..-._...-.-...-.--.-.-...-.-...--..--.......-.-.-.-....-...-...-.-.--.-..-...------.-...-.--..--...-.--...-..--.-.: l l l I l l - WOOd - : c E I W. C n l E Cororation, Ltd : I ' I i, UPRIGHT & CHEST EREEZERS ° FRIDGES ' COMMERCIAL EREEZERS 5 l I I : cuesr FREEZER - CHEST FREEZER 5 to 25 CUBIC F! “I g ' †C“ F‘ ‘25 C†F‘ ST HlESS ' BLACK ° WHITE ‘ I : Model #wcco7/w2 , - Model #02505W3 “ Al 1 A N 19m »‘ : . Compare at Compare at T" ' : $359.99' $789.99' DUCT, l A : a». A .- WAREHOUSE MUST BE CLEAR“): 5 ' I I : UPRlGHT 3 UPRIGHT 5 Arthur Street South, GUGIPh : : J ~ FREEZER ' ‘ '-' i a. FREEZER Wednesday Jan 20...10 am - 6 pm M warms“ i : m ' 12 Cu Ft “ - ' 20 Cu Ft Thursday Jan 21...10 am - 8 pm amt : : “" o Frost Free 3 l 4 I“ . a ' -..- . Manual Friday Jan 22...10 am - 8 pm on A : : a Model I ‘ V ' 1 Model Saturday Jan 23.4.1!) am - 5 pm weiwa‘ : I .â€"-. , i 4 l Sunday Jan 24..,12 pm - 5 pm I : a... #FU12W H E V2003RW3 Monday Jan 25m“) am _ 6 pm By 401/ : Q fâ€"T_’ ' _ | a , :|‘ 5 PW" . a ..-f\» Tuesday Jan 26...10 am 6 pm i . . - ,/-\_ . . _,,*.‘, , Ems, . .k__a_.v. M, ,, a†' | I ) Jr 1 , """L“i ‘ l _ “m i _ « . , , IS mm 1060 JERSEYS, . = x2 f. , 3 g 3 "a. 3 M , Also ATTII lOCA‘I‘IOlI... mmslnmm : : ' i l ’ . " ' " ’ f" V FLEECE PANTS, HOONES, : l m a Compare at l “"’°' ' ompare at {16 3, 3G 4 f '3 . “Hm“, KloSWMR-u : "" ’ ' a . ¢ 5 _ . e 5 sec “79-99 * "29-99 ,i . r a “lit UNBELIEVABLE : : d $395 425 “ ‘ "K‘s“ ~ . I I " 11m ' : â€ASSET ENGINEERING aâ€, l 1 : “Baud “(mm m luv-Emory has but mid to all" w- m mined in mu m rims tut not at my AS twin-um) Amt Ditws‘tlor‘ Pm‘OwOM'n amtmqineeriwcom in“. in: j ;