mnmmucm ~_ . ‘ ‘ ‘M _ ' l «at; ~<â€"~~¢ â€"â€"~ ~~ â€" SD / ‘ i l t t i I r J r I 8 5 6 l 7 A l J l l l l ’ l l J l I t i“ ‘ l ' ‘ 1 J .4} ,2 J j J J J .2 J J J M v Cat's-5"L’JE; , 4322“; was ‘, WEDNESDAY. DECEMBER 9, 2009 - WA'l‘l'LRl.()(). ONTARIO * $1 INCLUDING CST 4 A . '7'7i' â€"’ ’_'“’7†7 ' "7 *"‘“‘ \\"’“7 7 ' ' 7 \ï¬ . New City “ (,,_‘_cc,_‘r,,_,,c__ l 1 | ' . stormwater ‘ 0 plan causmg J fu ' f ‘ I " 2' i i r\ r 0 S] n 01' r x c n 0 I; «54 taXpa ers ‘ “V . y l l _ BY (Elm; MALDt Nun _\ . ' , ,_s,s;waw:r:~yr‘ ,, , , l ' _ â€" ARTS FOCUS UnfllNUll reign] at Monday mght‘s «in ‘ M. I J ,7 A \{ l / Radio [ceaeock cusston of the city's new srnrrnwater K ‘ - 7' ‘4 \ ,' i ’ I \ f3 Page 26 charges and how the rates would tilled l r ' * 7 i (Z \- ‘7 \_ ' .4 ‘ ' ‘ l > I .\ “Do we need a separate system tor ‘ I' l ; “1 Si; - -‘ ‘ V t “ funding stomiwater management?" asked l ' /‘ M A16.“ 5 I] 1' i n ,’ g ,, ' Waterloo resident sheila Brown. “It just i V t ‘ A (A 2'; - ’6 pi?“ . ~.’ ‘ seems so complicated." ‘ f W / A} t Y ,4- 03 V 'x l 0rd a igflim } ‘ \‘ ’lhe municipalitv is currently debuting , ‘ ‘5 M Q &§\§_. H “ ' I ‘ .‘ whether to change how it charges home- l if! 9.“ i . ,1 0‘ (’0; w {a} j " . ~ . owners, businesses and industries {or _ ‘1‘, '4; 431'“ Q0 2" ‘ “v“ ' *~‘ . stormwater â€" the water collected from J " , if ,‘ -‘ 5 W 1/ . '1 ‘0' Q: i ‘ 3;" ~ ‘ pnï¬pitatior‘ijand niglted snow, _ l‘ f, ) ï¬ll-‘1 X Q41“ 1%» , . . x" L 7‘ 0 City wens e wa er into a series V , t ' e V -.. so of pipes and creeks and into the (irand / â€"! a , l .‘ , 7' , $\¢l ALL“ «9.:- f } River. '_ 2’ f“: to“, 5’] n X ’5 - - 4‘ ,_ 2. Currently, the system is funded through a \ \A ,6 x.‘ l â€I; u “ ‘ M a : _ .3 property taxes. but city staï¬wants to move " a; at." i y,“ \ / g.“ A“ ~â€" . $37243â€. to a user-rate model where every property “52"" I,†" ,-’ f \ g9" ’ r? " ~_ '_ f . pays for its stormwater use f» y‘ K] \ V V )6 A; .7 : ' “One of the main ideas behind this is “I." \‘ [0‘ \J/ . q“ ‘ . ~ ' Q ~. SPORTS that all of the properties in the city use the a" \ \ A"? 7 . ~ g \ ‘ ' stormwater management system and we ' ' , I \ ‘9 \Q . - »_ Localï¬reï¬ghter should all help pay for it." said Tim Ander is). \ s ‘ a world champ son, general manger of public work SEI’WO - \\ , Pa 929 es for the City. V) A g Different rates have been calculated for residential. commercial. Industrial and a tax-exempt properties. 4 ¢ Staff says the changes will actually V _ - v - / - _ bringdown the tax ratebyfourpercent. “N w: "ff; fffj: though those costs will just be moved to \§ é! . -' ' ' water bills. Q \ “ ; * __,_.~u mm. A,‘ ' The decision to make changes is based ‘ I ‘ U G d on shifting the burden of the rate â€" from m R 7 K 5 “8 ra "tee residential owners taking the load to busi- “Wmm R ~z-â€"-_~~ Hess and industry- which are typically on For whom the bell tolls RESUllS l rti 3181:5752: “:18! be phased in over {our The Waterloo Bell was covered in chalk drawings again last week. But instead of some grand statement it years starting in 20] I, m‘th 35 per cent of was covered with messages of condolences for local iconoclast Marcus Green who chalked up the bell the charges mming from homeowners tax originally on Augrls. For more on hlS tragic passmg see Page 8. bills [0 their utilities, Condnuedonpagelo '7 " "h â€7“ _ ‘*‘f"'â€"7T _. .‘ Waterloo [u ‘_:/,ï¬:.,:] m . \ 5l9.746.2777 F“ m" 3““ mm. mm .. WW â€owns; W W "w WW» _.___. , . 0 XFMW'Y _ r J z 91-. c: b from W ; 5 (ï¬g? ggï¬â€™t’i‘flfl } <- : ‘2 '- www.forbesauto.com :2 ~ ‘ ‘ “ ‘- r' 'L " ‘ ‘ ‘t‘ _ . », 1...“... Ir not roasts momou - no“! m: zoom-zoom my ‘ -' MWWMME’EMQW ' r ». ~ ' ‘ ~. , Via: swarm am.mm mun Register now at www.forbosauto.com for your test drive a