Waterloo Public Library Digital Collections

Waterloo Chronicle (Waterloo, On1868), 2 Dec 2009, p. 8

The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

u - “at l kiln l( NIKON“ it - “willful.“ its. K'Jlilk‘l : sow SW “chef \i N \ullt.‘1i‘ “alt-now ”out,” Ml ill! W4 up)“ l,1\ ‘H “but“ huhwalt‘lllulllitliiutta til lil‘N t( llRtl\l( ll ‘ ‘_~ tnfiwud in“, \\l\|\l l k M M isiii k iltlltikl\l ’..’<.v' . iw \ Kit xx \i RRY KlDS {1 f as, ‘i,5'~/j\ a? lltlltht-it A?“ I {if silk," "a . r“z iJllHlititlfthllk'litkkll t‘l m ..i I g}. tygifla‘FM "in. ‘ Sat»: fi- lm.“ will out...” at .i ME CAN T f. a a 5 it"_’f .."v if,“ (mouth l‘iuiiel‘ti‘kliii M.‘ ,.t' i" Rll'ttkllku- HERE tintummiiiriiunimiall i .%. (. int-g '\l\tlt1t\\lll \ ' 3. ltll’thIlKe\t!\ . ‘ L‘ilil at ilt Wild“! utiieih u hroiiit It" ca jV xiniRiistNo [9 ' m M“ . -_‘ . lu‘rix xiti'i‘ii l m no a? f. tho WSIC ' to l\ll sxiis\i\\\oii< ,.~ . I tantamountit...i ,-- $1 3 193“ if, 0 M M‘Se -. " s . ‘ l v. \\ll\Rll’Rla.\l\l\l|\l-.s _ w a . . ‘ y j . 4. a, a; \; . jay om loUd kids . Him.“ ”(it l)e\t 1:1 ’ ' l ; J”. _ o l 7 llluwilli‘ “ateili-xhrnnitle ta "‘ ' T,‘ " l‘ \ ' . gmpy OH ' a , . t' ' I sumo mm m ::i . (A) , J fig . v in \\.l“' uaterluxhioriitletti ’ l j", J " L ‘ i" fl WM 4 ; . A - ‘. Qt - A 4 ..., ,,, . ,| ”Q o l‘ 1 ~ . . l s 4 . A v . ~ . f I f. will). CurA-‘fe, ' A ' 1.0 \ o d t . . y t . l lR( l l..»\Tlt).\ <lil whâ€"ltfltictt I” ‘“,~ . Q Q t madam Publications \1AIl Ntilt‘s , ‘ , l C fill] d H d t “it”... W we, l CHRONICLE. ED” 0m,“ are y con31 er uori e ques ion Tutor“?! l \ l d S~ l \ lum’idc flap hag infected hâ€"fi‘fi benefit and none (ll llill'lll. lllLlliJllttnd 1:47:1tlf . Ll'lul . Ulll' Clear as mud “10 “11h (“untithr COH- ( ‘l 113“, i in” (“r-rt”! CUllnk‘llth lld‘l' lirilxiT-l’xui}. ammo wt cerii. Notwithstanding .‘ ' chosen to disregard the stir ilLlL'i it‘ in .. - _ , _ . u v , ~ 1 ‘ -‘. ) l the resentatton made to re tonal counctl was so iâ€" that Waterloo (wast named ( .( )l l l \ l \ 1 ”“fi‘ ”Um (”til “Old " m ‘Q- ' posed to answer all ofthe questions surrounding the the World s lop intelligent ‘ - . g“, lllt‘letl’ (”1 ill“ ”tltlml't‘K ' ' recent fluoridation foul up. it didn't. (kiiiiititiiiity"‘ we seem to haw: i ‘ water tllltlrldittlfln» “""",/ What we have here is a failure to communicate. That trouble choosing elected repA l ' in" fa l~or newcomers to this Accra a, was the premise of the memo a water officials weren't reseritatives that understand W V I “”‘,”,”“'“-‘“ allow "I“ I” y “it... aware of all their reporting obligations to the regions and respect that intelligence. ‘ . g . ( ' l l"“lt|“tl ”W matter. U“? Lltlt‘h\\;l\lt‘.r‘l;:;Edhjzmlg‘l‘t' t1s?:tl‘lrsl:‘:l Public Health department. In N0\.~c,“m.r 2001 [0]. , “mild expect fluoridation to it L t. , _ . ., w ,, ,,'....‘ t« “minim,” i m ' ' The Public Health department in turn left the Citizens lowuig the RIM park flnanr l . fig l in as rt adilt at t cptt d as ofWaterloo in the dark for almost a year about a break- (till (whittle, not one memr i & A ' iodine is tn salt or \‘liiltii|ll l) ”“W'” muss (“1 \( “ down of the water fluoridation system that meant the her of the council including . l I" milk» It emerged m" "Um limxiflzrfi S::'I‘\'(l‘:‘;1:‘l"“;"lb: majority ofthe city was not getting that treated water. the mayor was re-elected. l l RICK l (h? lithtlffllO'l“ “f it phar- . “made“ “Human”. “MN ”m”, "lhey promised to do better next time. But ifthere was suspect this was because I BEYERS l maceutical Illilnttfiit‘illrc,r: n her no“ spa ers «my titrlipldlni a failure to communicate in this situation. where else do this group suspended their L~~ â€"â€"â€" ~ 7 iii; Wits tht‘ rt‘fltlt OffltN‘rVEttll’rt ‘ P about new. lerllulH inht’l'llslng or these two depanments have their wires crossed? critical iiidgement and to his/her own personal ola natural phenomenon. Africa“?Tiff-Tinawill: (flit: These are the types ofproblems that were supposed to hitched their wagon to a opinion on communal water Communltlt’s with its \ ' 4 . . . ~ 4 . , - ‘ <, , Lg," m. hmmh. N, (i,‘|MmPp”-“ be solved after the Walkerton water crists. Public health snake Oll salesman; they fluoridation. as representa- Stratford hdd stdthHdll) tu-tmtii, 1 (”mum strut-i Sunt- officials and water operators were supposed to be on the failed to apply high school lives of this “intelligent lower rates (It "10th decay, PM l”"‘”“'~“\ “W l“ same page when it comes to what goes into the water, mathematics to the num- community they ought to be Ahab?“ ShOWt’d that their “Humor“ and when to reportaproblem. bers and failed to apply required to apply scientific drinking water (‘()rltfilltt‘tl im- “mu-mt ”1 ma “New“ m. There also should have been a little more sensitivity common sense â€" “if it eVIdence to their dectston fluoride. So an experiment mutt-tied by otpyngm and may he around this issue with a debate raging in this city about appears to be too good to be making. was established where trim? “W1 “t'l‘ f‘" WNW“ t“'”*”"‘"’fr whether it wants to continue the practice of water fluori» true..." The most worrisome communities llrtCltrdlttil ;‘fc'ri’:£p:$“ur::#mi’ “will? “ff dation or not. Alarmingly. it seems that behaviour of one councillor Brantford) added flllUrldt‘ t“ L' r k I \C iâ€" _ 4 ‘ 4 , ' . . , u . n ' , V ' , mm“, L, m“ J,“ my U, 3,“ Waterloo Will be holding a plebiscne next fall to the current counCil fails to is the support for denier their water and (outlrmul material you musl first who”. mt- atiswer that very question. and now confidence in the appreciate that intelligence rants in the form used by cli- the benefits (”fluoride perm-mun ”f the "wk-r «it the we.» fluoridation system is shaken bythis oversight. is the wise and beneficial mate change deniers today. In spite Of the Natural "?h‘B’;”\,“;‘“hf" ‘Qz'tmi‘um' “I“ While the water operators took much of the blame in application of knowledge By challenging the benefit of aspects Of the prOCChS- ft‘itr {finnjlk Zyzntficm'lg’l" N" at: the memo for not knowing the regulations required of and knowledge is acquired fluoridation and claiming of It is easy to generatedue so, wan-rim 0mm, N3) not ublic health. Wh 'didn‘t the health de artment actively the search for truth using wilful harm is being to the other uses offluoride. ‘ 4 4 y . ' . . . 4 t _ investigate the pace olthe repairs? ‘ _ . a combination of the scten- imposed on the community My challenge to you. the l-tiflttRS POIâ€"K ‘ As it stands“) ,r cent ofthe ci is still Without fluoriâ€" tific method and careful these rants den the snow voters, is to use the 0"? Year It ithccdi i i- the P1 . , .. . . . 4» .. “fig": iii“ “é"fl'gfilu‘r'c’zmrm dated water. And the costs to fixit are mounting. observation l m sure that title rationality that is the remaining before the big and new," “a", Adam's“ m, his left some people wondering whether they should the academics. intellectuals, essence of our progress and Vote tOPIOOk at your Ctlun‘ telephone numbers are Na only for bother turning it back on at all. engineers and scientists in the essence ot'Waterloo. tillors. You should take the \Cf|fiL3llOfl purposes and will not be l J ‘ ' ., _, .3/.' 57. .â€"~«' , ._ 5 ‘ ', r, a“ 1 [his Community will support [gt's look at the history of necessary steps _[() rid your. if???” Namiliewiitniflzxwh ‘ “ 4“ f ‘ ‘v ’ l i .. A ‘ 7 “- r " "~1'- v.45?” . is the truth that water fluorida- fluoridation in Waterloo self of Counctllors who crescrw rig u i.tonâ€" ‘» pf “be r: ’, » ‘J ‘ 4 " ; ‘ "j?“ "~‘j,;*v . . . . . ‘ dense or mm in, contrihulion i“, afif- "r%‘i€‘1§§?"g’§ N: avnf‘evt-"Eg‘iw; tion is a public health pro- Region.0n November in, replace the Wisdom of i mm.» m regal twp-m we" may * , twp, L4,“ , .: . . . ., _ _ i: gramworth supporting. 1982 the Waterloo (.hronicle eXperts and the value of , hr ‘“"'"""“d h.“ l“ '” "°""‘""’"“ 1 I‘m ‘ "' ' i , 2. fl":- ' l' in 1, _f1_. But the critical issue is banner read: “Courage" of careful observation With “ "r it) small '“ NW" if“ .. ’- , . j r " ‘ J; the behaviour of some the silent maioritv quashes their OW" opinion, altflwatcrlixuhromtle ta or by mail 4» A?“ A. .,_,§ ~ the ‘ he " , ‘ ~ - ‘ ' ' 1' Afi ll ' ' . or delta-red to who“. ("hmmcln fly? fazjgcwpgfih g counctl members in relation bid to halt fluoridation. . er a “prevention pm No Weber 5: N . sum so Waltrluv »“ “3.33 733.4; if" ‘ l 2" ' .: , {is to this matter, While each Now 27 years later. with Vides the highest and best -. ‘ v :-.2.‘. p,}"f:':A-, 5 ‘ ' ‘ "" f” "I -'| A . t - - t . than“ NU "l" ' ' ‘ ‘ ‘ ' ’ counctl member is entitled overwhelming eVidence of form Of hEdlth care.

Powered by / Alimenté par VITA Toolkit
Privacy Policy