lo - “All in in J ( â€MONK I} - Wednesday in (Him! zoos UW backs away from plan to change its logo ~ ’ Hi can. Mullins/tin Hun-I “as \llr|)fls('tl by what she talls the vgflllto" 11mm“ H Vii/7} logo rebellion" and the fallout from the line g hook group tll‘l rung the lien \H'\| alter it ,_ a.†" he ll!ll\('l\ll\ or \\t|lt'fltNi ml] not launth a leakedonlineduring the summer 5) a; ¢ Ilt'n logo in human and mll ltlslt'dtl move "We're taking a pause in pulling torth a IIt‘\\ , r $1» Ix. \* forward \\Illl other thlx1lsUlIl\lt‘lll11ll(llllg logo," Bet he] said " lhe it.“ tion happened and /m 4 d If?!†‘ â€Ã© tainpuign we are reassessing things. [I ‘S Coming Meg Hm Rel the \t lll)(1l\ \ ice provost of "We have to come up with something that's r\ternal tillairs. admitted defeat last week dur- goingto work for ieveryone‘i †June 4‘s) â€10 ing a town hall lilt‘t’lllig \'~‘Illl students at llW's The results of a survey that the school mmclalumnwom student life centre launched in September will help guide that ( lose to 10,000 people signed up to protest process. . against the planned new logo. which depicted l‘he online questionnaire showed three dil» ADLEHRUS'ERS w ll N You “I strings of intersecting coloured lines inside of a ferent logos. including the lustf'l‘lllt'd W. l m you id n "l CM“. large. black W. l'he second showed a skewed W, with the top ,i ,f; I ., fwd . i. W7? _ 7 7 quarter coloured yellow and the bottom U N I v E R S I TY o F black. The ï¬nal design was just the school's WA I E R Loo . name split into those two colours. The three ideas depicted different ide~ ologies for the eventual logo â€"- the laser Beckel wasn't negative about the rebranding, logo depicted a bold vision. while the though. - school name version was more conserva- The other aspects of the program - including tive and the askew crest was somewhere new banners along University Avenue and spe- in between. cific colours for each of the faculties , have had "Among undergraduate and graduate a positive reception. students we found a reference for a The university lans to move ahead with P P more conservative approach â€" either a that portion ofthe plan. name brandin or no lo 0 at all." Beckel Th will also look to ï¬nd a new visual iden- 8 g ey said. tity for the school. “Prospective students expect to be marketed - to." she said. “They want to be told what we do. D ' L B “And a logo is a big part of that. Irs Ianne - auer But she's resigned to the fact that there will i i always be controversy over any new logo. ‘ l W M “Personal taste we're never going to win on." she said. “We recognize that not everybody is going to like it." While Beckel struck a mostly conciliatory tone in her back and forth with students, most in attendance were still plenty ï¬red up about the logo branding. “lasers were cool in the 805. Maybe people A“ in the early stages of this process were too old." m “- said fourth»year Student James Walkoski. “The logo reminds me of something i saw in my childhood, like a laser Show." Third»year Student Travis Myers didn't see what all the fuss was about. “if the logo on a box of Kraft Dinner eWS changed. I'd still eat it," he said. "If you tried to change this process 15 years ago. you would ALL NEWS RAD-0 [TSETP'L‘Ze‘i'é’ELi’Ilï¬â€˜SZ‘é’éi‘ZLZiiiiï¬iï¬i$3235 (Mum aimis‘wopmteto have to do anything." - mmmofyomlovedm lle wishes the students were more vocal on ' other issues. such as the school's recent expan- m.sm Hm:519â€"570~9802 Cell:519-5724)073 “or! "m Duff“ . _ . 0 Email: dhmwmm l~or more coverage on the logo, see page 1 l. ' v i . M Wit..i'~- '?;7t.. . “ > St “ ~ A "1:35. * -‘-"-"' W a '""““~" ‘“ ‘ -.. _.r " V M " IV" †" l A h '“' mmâ€" Al LASIK MD' we correct: ‘ a 1 P ’ g ‘ .\ ‘ ‘ LASER wsuon CORRECTION , f at . . g Necrsrgh'redness s»; 1 ' Starting at _ ‘ s ® Financing availabie g Forsightedness a, , n 4 wrlh low monthly . . i l ., Me- payments E A f gm f m s I o Is Dr Omar Hakim Dr Nimesh Desm 5,5“: . , I t" i ‘ v' i l i " ' l _ > ’ . AccordD ~ low-am