The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

a -WA1aRwo MICE-Wednesday, August I9, 2009 ' 279 New St N . Sun: 20 Waterloo. Oman N1] 3H8 5i9»&8t>2830hx 5|9~8w9.l83 mm W Peter WiNKLliR PUBLISHER 1- -~ -- . ‘ EDITORIAL r ' Bub VRBANAC \" EDiTOR ext 229 editorialw‘walerltnchromclc Ld @ sponswwaterlnushronicle n «*«F Melinda DALTON . , Q $8 REPOKIER ext 203 ' . ,1 3;.» mdalton‘flwaterlotxhnmiclc ca ‘ 4 1. f (13:7 § . Greg MACDONALD . ,. 1&3”; , \ f REKNU'ER m 215 , . T}, ’ .- ,. ' gdnixdonald‘e‘waterloochnmclc ca N if; 3“"; fit I \ ”f ADVERTISING fir,“ 7"“ ‘ . V ,4?) ' Gerry MATnCE exI. 230 -' a). , ‘ RETAIL SALES MANAGER - . 4 sales®watcrloochromclexa / _\ , _ A“ SAIEs REPRESENTATIVES ‘1‘ “3““ ‘ ' I" Heather BOYD ext. 222 ”K . ‘r, ; _._, hbodewaterloochromcle ca ,5. ‘ ~. Norma CYCA cu 223 l _ mycaewaterlom‘hronicleca , ' Jenny MACNEiLchL 228 I . ’ I’ JMMillflwnterltxthmclexa CLASSIHED F LL,“ , , . . 519395-5230 I ‘ ‘ ‘ I ‘ ' ‘ , y M... . . (.H mm ML w! IORIAL ; Waterloo needs the selence - 7 zmzzg‘fifci;: M.” 5"“ 1 Dear Dr. Stechey, presi- information request. to prove Publicauon Amman Numb" Rust contra dent, Royal College of Dental ( I l l l \ l artificral water fluoridation 40050478 . Surgeons ofOntano: ' g was or Is safe. effective or i waning”; 5mm“; 5cm] Mum. A nyone else think the bell looked pretty good when it This open letter to you. ( ( )1 l l \ I _\ cost efficient. The decision i he, ASSN 03324410 all gussied upwith chalk on Saturday/l concerns artificial fluorida- whether or not to fluoridate i Audited Circulation. 31,292 It was bright, colourful and vibrant â€" just like the tion of municipal drinking municipal drinking water is l A public was imagining when they thought of the civic water. 5 ' the municipality's responsi- - ”I W square. The Royal College of Den- . bility. w,“ Best of all. it all washed away pretty simply and. more tal Surgeons of Ontario . 9‘ . Voters must have proper Am « importantly. cheaply. (RCDSO) is the governing. é. amass to relevant source sciâ€" V Of course, it was also a desecration of a piece of art. teaching. licensing regulato- ‘ ence on such an important The Wm mem :1)“ wouldn‘t paint a moustache on the Mona Lisa. as y body for all Ontario ‘ issue. We rig to see the fol- each Wednesday by Metroland esayinggoes. entists lowing reco ' Med!- GTWP Ltd The city's manager of cultural development, Betty in 2003, the RCDfilO ' ROBERT - Source science proving Anne Keller, has a point when she says that the bell is announced it ‘forma y systemic inges- ‘ afmmm? $1,,th not perceived as art. She's also right in saying that it endorses use of fluoridation FLEMING don/swallowing artificially an: 0mm has Councd. which could be moved anywhere else in the city. in municipal drinking water dian municipality to adopt fluoridated water causes a Considers Compilim lit-inst mm- Perhaps that's the solution. if that piece sat outside of as efiective means to prevent artificial water fluoridation. reduction in dental decay $335.?er énémpllml the Canadian Clay and Glass Gallery. or perhaps close to dental caries in all age History shows Ontario den- rates and“, 5&5: M128”: the entrance of the city’s new museum at the mall. it groups." It also stated, tists. licensed and regulated 0 Source science proving l newspaper. Unresolved complaints might beappreciated more. “Where fluoride has been bythe RCDSO. supported the that systemic inges- C‘" be ”mus“ '0 0mm" PM! in the square. it looks strange and out of context added to municipal water arrivaloffluoridation lion/swallowing of the ff&“$" Z ng'hig‘fl'i Suite among the sea of concrete. instead of brig'ttening the supplies, there has been a This luly, I spent two full hydrofluorosilicic acid used ' m“ " ' public space and making it look more inviting. the rusty marked decrease in tooth days in antford, collecting to fluoridate â€" along with its COPYRIGHT bell looks like it belongs elsewhere. decay rates â€" between 35 whatever information they trace co-contaminants The mom“ of '1“? WWW“ I" It’s a dour piece. belonging in a more contemplative per cent and 50 per cent in had supporting fluoridation. arsenic. lead, mercury and m amwm“ my bf space. Surely it doesn't fit it with the great. fun operas children, and 30 per cent in pursuant to a freedom of radionuclides â€" is healthy “,1 Purzoufiml “he, rm that have been the highlight of the square or the skate- adults.” it also stated the US. information MW“ and safe over a lifetime of reserved and mu use in Ft) boarders who liven up the space when it's empty Centers for Disease Control , No supporting records of human ingestion. hub-led. To nuke any we of thil But the city has proven something with all the square “estimates that for every dol- science existed at the time 0 Source science proving “"9“" Y“ mu" “r" ”m" “be debacles lar (US) spent on fluorida- water fluoridation began in all fiuon‘desarethe same and mwgnzmmm: Think ofutlhe sikateboam who 2ft“ $r$webrgrtel§e tion, 580 is saved on dental a“: city. There WEN. howev- glint mumilicic acid's tact Bob var-inc. “[01.me 500W 0 e C ty. NW N an e l- y care“ er, the usual 0 inions, "00 0 ' e dl-‘JSOC' iates Chronicle, 279 Weber Sr. N. Sum mentioned. People have moved on â€" justifiably â€"â€" to The RCDSO prefers to cite endorsements and am“... into free fluoride ions upon 20. Wine-100. 0mm N11 3H3 questioning the bell. . water fluoridation opinions. tions without supporting contact with water. ms POUCY That complaint Will get dealt With as well and some- endorsements and accredita- source science. 0 Source science and cost . W m a. a“, m. (W k day soon the square Will be what everyone wants It to trons. Without prowding the it is becoming clear mm documentation that a dollar writa'n mu m We, m be. actual supporting source sci- artificial water fluoridation spent on water fluoridation Ind Wm Am g Hopefully. ence..'l‘hl.s Isobeervedin your began in Ontario without saves any dollars on dental WE "' “u will all be publications, speaking ctr- solid m in hand. care. “WM N'm' , will .0. be “an cuns, and recently In the Wutefloo's water has been Please respond as held We m the right ”can con- RCDSO presentation to artificially fluoridated since promptly as you can. After den” at "1°" My contribution for Thunder Bay Council on luly 1966 and we face a Novem- all, it is our water and our 3"" ‘3' mmmimegg 20. 2009. after whldi council ber 2010 re-vote on the m. health at stake. or by email to editori- ”(ed '0 “0' Md 5 1"th Our city. region and Pub- - al.watedoochronicle.ca or by mail to bring fluoridation to their 13c "and. hue "or been at», Robert]. Humbug is the 0' *“Vfit'anmMi‘k- community in 1945. Bnnt- to provide mm, 1)!qu Wmof m2] 3'"; ‘ ' ford. Ont W the “I“ Cma- mm_ um . Mm of WW