WA] “(1.00 CHRONICLE ° Wednesday April 112009 015 0 Agata; fi--'~,;'=-. ‘ g ‘ 1 ' -.Q museum â€- at 1 1 . {N‘s if; The real casualties i“ 1,“ T3“ 1.1: 1 ‘ " †$551? . 1 1. ., . a «if flew 1 at . 4.1-135 gs: . . a w stifles-z,“ zone» was: in; 5m “Vi-1 with .~ ; Jgeelgr 1â€"5 0 e I'BCESSIOH †.1 1 iii-v ~- 1“: we fégisfrgfr 11, if, v {A ., M, rs ' 1 ,_ - . â€"! ~ - “g 1 ~ « or, ‘ f ‘ ; '»t“»r;,~': .t‘._ ‘v': - .- QM; : 1".“‘,'“-:;t {50:5 “1 Di There is no ques» To suggest that l '“ ' "1 ° 4†'" ‘ ‘-' if ' ‘ '- m? “23" ' “f†. 1‘, "5 W a ' ‘ " W311"? “f? tion the current ’ poverty has no‘ ~‘ 1. , ' v i \ ' -:‘.‘Z\*\ ’i p - < r? :\'~'fféw;*t~w, y‘éï¬ifg» is?» . no, ..r' °4.'u‘c.1.xi;.i 11“ s W ' economic downturn [ ’I I“ \ I \\ appeared on the 1" â€9 - ‘ "M ‘1 ' ‘ «gag! "‘ ,'r‘"‘:,_='â€' " mi “a ’ "fâ€: f"? 1:3 â€riff†â€Jig“? 15" â€9353“? * “7?“ " 1. hasin one wayor \| \|â€RS political "radar" “3" aâ€; 31“ ' " "as “ff-96.11" "n; Q" " ‘i" i ' 5†' â€Ta???" ‘ if“? ‘5†or; 1. : another impacted an ofmany palm» teetzmtsâ€" "t +11“ -ii..'"‘"f“="a‘a“3§5§ asset â€of, ofus herein Waterloo mg .. cians in Canada ' ' A l U ‘ A“ ' ion. From recent " ' ‘ is rather unfair. "17; " F‘r'w.» grergduates looking for a. ., When Dalton ' .- ". 1 . "in wwwgolftownxom that elusive ï¬rst job 1 MCGuinty » 1 ’ 1 ii , â€it†52; in a market where few . ‘ returned to the 4 n" ‘ ~ A U P V" 3. exist to retirees deal- 1 Premier‘s Ofï¬ce OW [999-2009 T - if“. ’1 1 ing with shrinking after the election . '†41321113†investments. we have , of2007.hisinau- ' i ' fl if all made adjustments A k guralthrone 1 £154? ' . . within our daily lives, speech and a 31†l A 1 However for one ART series of subse- d d s o m e group â€" residents SINCLAIR quent announce- who exist in pove merits indicated â€" the recession page the province was to you r ents a unique series of challenges serious about addressing the and misfortunes. poverty portfolio that many previ- The photograph of poverty in ous governments, including - Ontario is a dismal picture getting McGuinty's own ï¬rst term, were worse by many standards. The hesitant or reluctant to handle. Ontario Association of Food Banks In December of last year, the (OAFB) has estimated that the province released their reduction 1,“ 5, 1 - after-tax poverty rate across the strategy which provided relatively Eï¬g, $55 province is expected to grow from aggressive targets for reducing ‘ 10.3 per cent in 2006 to 13.6 per child poverty over the next ï¬ve Triu- ’ 1 ‘ 1 ‘_ cent in 2010 - or an additional years. One of the ï¬rst measures to 1 » ' ‘ ’ $3- 1 474,368 residents being driven into assist in addressing this issue was 1 f this unfortunate predicament dur~ the recently announced increase 1 ing the next two years. in the maximum amount for the ' ’ The OAFB compiled a unique Ontario Child Beneï¬t from $600 to repon last November that $1,100 per child annually. A addmsed the previously over- However the opdmism incor- ',aylormade looked economic cost of poverty. potated within the poverty reduc- , The contributors to this document tion strategy was somewhat miti- , 1 were not habitual social policy gated last week with media reports t, » . "~ Tour Burner analysts - the list included TD that the government was reconsid- is: Qâ€; ~- Driver Bank Chief Economist Don Drum- ering proposed increases to the Agghr? . ,_ mond and James Milway ofthe minimumwage. PremierMoGuin- ï¬-1o-[14Jr M†“W m ‘r""‘" "W Martin Prosperity Institute. two ty indicated that next year‘s sched- 1‘ ~-‘ ' Al. BU us) â€W femur â€- individualswhohaveestablished uledincmseto$10258nhour ' SPEC, Y “45131!â€va aâ€. .; . < signiï¬cant credentials amongthe maybecanoelled becauseofcur- h,.,,._pr1,111_113,1 . 1 corporateworld. renteoonomicoonditions. “111111... 1,1 11] . The general assumption of their Murray Campbell is the 19888 1 1' , ' analysis was that beyond the Queen's Park columnist for'l‘he f" â€f ' 1 1 moral imperativeofreducing GlobeandMail.Heisarespected if}. "“""" "‘ " poverty, there is also an economic and veteran political scribe who “... 1.1 115911†â€' ' "‘-"--" it" " " ’ ‘ necessity. Poverty costsanestimat- “a. - “aw; it 71 ed$32to$38billonannually Continuedonpqla "W"; " â€7 n †across Ontario. appearing through 1 <1 .. 1 ' ‘ extrachargesto the healthcare . 1 «mm, - 1. , 3331-7 - ' system,administeringsocialassis- “atâ€: ‘ "_’ f I"? z; - 1‘ - f'. ,_ 1 1 tance programs and losttaxrev- {a}: E 4 To -" ' , ’ ~" If“: 1 . '- , s ' enue. 1. ,' fe- a ‘7 / "9 ‘E -. f However,accordin to the ’» _' - ~""' " . m z ' a“ f 1131+- N. OAFB, ifOttawa and tile Ontario 2 F709 ;Cl0fh93.- E E 3312??? 55a; * 1 -. . , governmentimplemented aninte- ; j1',<;;,:. ' ‘ ‘3jï¬' 1 _1_,- " an fliï¬ï¬i if it ‘ 1 W in?» f»? 11 '- grated perspective on the root ’ _ _‘ ' â€". s - ' $115." â€iï¬w“; giggiféiz. 1, Mini" 3 : ~v~»,_'v‘~.:'.:r‘€;‘t";...5-.. . . t~ . causes ofpoverty,theywould rec- †2113’s; ;- _ _ 1 ’ cg]; , 57.113; ,»_ £1†~ - .._. f ._ . ognize that investments in reduc- ~‘ MARCNJREL :-. .- i rjU‘i'l": “a: {G}. ;1,_;,â€"..;£j1 ¢;.;'L;~§".-.‘1-g‘ : ':...;: tion would signiï¬cantly cut treat- ' ’ " ' ‘ ‘ C 31:1 = ‘ 4 i ' ’-2’"'3T"""""~ F?- iii-uh" :’ ment costs over time. APRIORI ! _ ‘ ' 1‘ 19,11 1-111 ."k,."â€"-i"-mf ï¬h‘ 1' 1 .' .. "f . Thelinlt between the persistent '_;_‘ _ 1 a â€a O ;‘ "1721.11; 1,155}; 1 ,' 1 pressures on poverty alleviating it SLACKV f 1 - ' f ' £3 W .'.‘;°,.’ 151- ' ~ programsâ€" includin social assisâ€" 1 ~. 4.1. -. 45 ' git- . 1 ft“ m,- L L <1 'f ' ‘ " ’ ' ' . 1 tance. social houalnggand health '§ â€mm $133; as s" any. Q', 11 i. we?» ° .. -.,. 1 T J ' ' â€akaâ€"wuï¬â€™tr'ii" 3 '°' 511,131} J: in; care _ and undead-morgu- a . ' 1 . 1 1 um} 1 A“ 11, «a 33Wâ€. “f. f' ï¬'ï¬'ffél‘ï¬aï¬rigï¬ï¬vz, eminent-«pendulum _ .1 . 1 m5 ‘ ». " = $13. w W “m atâ€; ‘ ff; ' 11“ ,‘ ‘ ' “it his. ditldhooddflebpmlnb “a" ' ;. 522 “I†’-‘“~' ’ 3‘1'3‘s ‘ ' â€a ' ‘ W“ ti""§f}{Â¥ 7g, 2}: ,_ 1'.__ 1†L, 1 f f» " 7.1.1 1! 1x 1; ' q ~t 1 1 .. w d“ 1 v 11"; ~ A jl , ‘_",}â€"«.t;e m,m“m - r . ï¬e _' â€557.521“? 1, 3 "111/37; (M4535. <\ 498141, / 45; > ._ 1;qu Aiï¬giwif » . a 41. t miï¬ï¬ mmmwd" 1 " 334 ‘ 1 ï¬ts-i"? A f '..' ‘w A,“ 1} 1 .. f jrw'f “4 ' {ï¬gï¬ï¬ if; .1 4221". " f: am In] ‘ M m m. , "WC“,- ' it!†n {if {is}? , fï¬t“it§g§§"f,;;€ V > “a g m". wa‘“ ‘ 1 â€f . 2136“ is???) nomic . â€to “a... \ ‘ mgr . i t ‘512; , 23." . -. “54 {$Wu . -â€" " ‘ ' ‘1- ~ if†5?‘ £521. a†a in: . ' H -.1†1&1â€. 1 ‘ .. 1â€" in“? 1 1 ~- . , ,. . L .. “Maurizio .‘ - 1‘ †f’ 11“: ' ant-mum ‘ “ 1_, ‘