The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

WW 'â€"_ ' ' 77 7 77 77' 7 7 77 77 7 T: l j a - WAl‘l-,Rl.()() CHRONICU'J owmiiesdayu ()vtuher :9 woe ‘ WATERLOO t t l t CHRONICLE l 279 Weber St N t Sun: 30 Waterloo. ( mum: N11 lHK ‘ *lq Momma NWMleM 7 i i l WV-w watutltuhmnitlc VJ 7 77 777 77777777777 77 7” 77)7 7 7‘7 77 l l Pt‘lt’l WINK] LR ! l‘l HI ism R l I “HUI-UM I 1' li.>t~\Rl$:\N-\t ‘ l I ~ OF w l l:l)llt)k ml 23‘) - l (‘klll-‘l’ldl“T“ijk‘lltHlllltllllkll” ta ? : sporlsttrutilt‘rlmmhhiiiitle“i RWY l I ‘ Q lemuler (>R\l\lt),\ I 4 ‘6‘ RI l’t)R'll:R m :m \ ,‘_ , ' I lttfllls‘lnllm“d‘clltnkllntnklk ta V, ‘ _ v.3! 3 . . . I! l .. w , x' ‘ (we; MAs'lfiNAH) *_ >1 ‘ _ L4} 9 ‘ Rll’ttkl‘lzkexi :is 2'] , 37‘? ’ . glluitisduiialdltt u Alcfltlkllfl‘lllk lc ta " I i I . / . Y1- -\|>\rl'l<ll\l\ti V .1 I" ,, ,. I tit-m sixriii‘t L‘\t 1m { ~ g} _ y". , _ R! l»\ll su i s \l>\?\\(tl R ”’h jaw-i ’5': I s: “a . salt-or: shtk‘lltxxllllllllkll‘ ta i1~y ‘53‘ a *7 ’f 3-1] .- . " ‘~ , i ; u ' . .' a . .1: t , s M is RizPRlsl-V'l \i in s 7 f .- 51,31 , f fl ' ‘ ' 'l o '57.?! 7 ‘ n ' Nomad Y('«\ HI I.“ J ' > 5" . , , _ _ l n » innilerliuxhronitle 1 f9 71" 9/7; 4 )‘ , - “ i: '9 ‘ . .: ’ ’ . ,, t we , t «:25.»- - at «a» we " = 3 :~ Little lHHllltLle "is n: ,- ., . w, “v; :34} ‘l'ltlllllllt‘llm milt‘rlotkhrtinitlt‘ la 1” l, ‘7 . - 7&9 ~ . _ a ,1 a t t _ 34 will «itiutsm :2: p -' § [,7 ' V a ’5 *5 ll} \ L‘ll‘llslil\KJlV'ltttkllllVlls11‘\J l (I: 77 /‘IF7:‘ / h I .. 4 '1‘ Litg‘ t :7, â€"-.'-I 7 , , *- 3, . --. ,_ t Cw . . . - 7. 3 an tl\\\ll|ll) .‘II/I/“f'g/ v1” (ll! ms sjtti 7:; > ' 7 7‘ 1’" £1,317 t |R( I I \ll(l\ ‘ "at .â€" <llt W» Biotin IN I tllliltlldll l’ul’rlitalinns \1.tii Sale» ' l‘lll‘llsdlltlll ‘\§1FL'Clllk‘lll Number tumours V I , lntt'rnaliondl \I.ind.iril Snail \llni CHR()NIC1‘P‘ ED1T()RII\[A 7 1 et S debate the faCtS her \SXtN WU: “I“ ““1"“ (”WWW" H I": I Et tlje le decide (“1(1me has “Fl-men 7 7 77 ‘ 7 7 7 ‘ that their motives intlude m ’4 6‘7 peop a letterto the editor of 1 ( It I l\ I the promotionof unrestritt .._..... w - . ‘ . , ‘ the Waterloo (jhmm‘. ed commerCial growth itizens for Better (internment made their latest cle (Oct If“ before reading ( ( )l [ |\ l \ Our involvement has / piteh to Waterloo city council Monday night about h i l7 (i “ “t. ._ f been wk,” about building a ma their to sal to hurt onertier overnment to the I ( ma rrpono mums or ’ t “we” region p p0 g g Better (kivemment [(iFBG). 3 brill? (UmVEUN‘FJ‘KES‘T ‘ ' 7 t l’v-now ‘vnhi a Cl renan gran c i ren “W “"6th l MUM“ '\ WWW“ “to group alwaw shit-s away from the word. but what ‘ I _‘d c gt 0 m _ lain and um le . it . s . U , 4 ,_ - . tops ofthe report and I hope P P - ”m “drum“? l” 4‘” "n” H 'lk b t h is mal amation ()f forcm - ~ . m re ta mg a nu ere a g l g , d ~fi h lgmplovmentopportuni» wail (”imp lid \ h h . . h r. , d d7 he reads it an shares in er a , , . toga er t e regions t ree cities an surroun mg towns comments with readers of ’ ties otmouslvan‘ important 21:7de ”if? (1“ 'N(-ll, hr ship;1and turning it 1:11“) one blnglf)‘. h ‘ ”m n paper _‘ if we want our families m ' ate! \tv ' tom 1‘ I\ a mem r - , ‘ v P l r 5 "3'- me 31-“ -_ ‘ ‘tl'f ‘ 3/ - . t . . at mtmunu neural-nut with l 7 group S" 5 we away .I )m t ( “m. g y (.l-Bbvolunteers have “"10"“?11‘1"th[hig W0” ' but how else would vou describe a toumil system that _ ~ 7 derful community Vlr ( "M toiisidcrs complaints against mem ' ld h ' 25 rd ‘ 1 l "d7l’ . ‘1," U! from citi7£ns7 worked [lmleggly u) (Insurp ‘ l _: '. ‘, , her newspapers An, mmplaint W)” met wa sane 9% I u I ’p . 7 the information we have pro- 3"" "the“ whocnticuw about new, oplnlt‘ns «ht-mung or Well they ve made their case to various murticipalities, vided is co t. We do wel- would be wise to pay atten Utndufl W7?” firstI he taxi-n I'm the and one city, Kitchener, has already pimped on board not come dehatlegon our work tion to the statistics released rtcuspaper ‘nresti \cd wimp aims t ~ . l . Is ,5 em h WUuld ‘ V . ' mm M New?“ W ”Mario l’le\ Sidlnfi If?” supportnflor :mrun :g?th:?irt ) hlgitln but we think it is important » three weeks ago‘b} the ('nunul 1 (MW We” W" 0"?” “Imp-V by “.9: “'71 p; p h7 h that those who take issue l‘heotficlal plan forthe Ontano Federatmnof Hm rimmttt oN sun in d 1““ mi": will" “m"?‘l is a 71mg“? m We)“: ‘7 without research respond Region ofWaterlon was labour indicatingin the past (“Pymmn ehati \Ml lot erhmuniupla in? vyJisrliillét)7:1;~;ndrl§ mm correct information. approved in 1975 and that rwopars 10.600iohs were mâ€" mmmh H, m" "chm?" m WHIP in other to) are pre imi an a; Mr ()row quotes a“re(ent same plan would continue lost in Waterloo Region pmtntcd by t ups right and mas he detemunt I In!” ‘7’“ tions (if? warrant ' poll" opposing amalgama for any new municipality. 5181”“? ll IS important lhdl t l t l in » su I on timnicr ' (amhridge city counCil has responded q1ll( Hy to that , _ V y l ‘ M; ‘n 7' ‘ pl imam" ‘ in II m . "n" k h th ks . tionWe are unaware of any The line protecting our farm “in“ “Immunity W “m“ r“ t. (- l o rt tare - , ‘7 V 'l_ ,, ‘ «Terri-1:73;! :tvmmeti ”(it I11: I\ pm ( a (anfiyrlcrlge hasalleeri 56:2: toa:forced amalgamation such poll and he does not tell land has not changed the gm ( out i rm d about our hthimt to inakc any Us! at m» ‘ t . 7 us who conducted it and use has remained agnculture Um!“ , mammal WU mu“ (ml ”Nam W bdort and [ht wounds still run deep 30 years after the what were the questions. He and that will continue, Wedont l"”“‘“ to haw t f. _ rocess ‘ .. , - , ( . _ t . _ , t will"Ml::‘r‘tnl:\'lirlt:t‘:tlYl‘rll‘t‘tlr‘rlflll’t‘te; 173.: p [hey said there is no public t‘lamouring for municipal goes on to “a“ that the bl“ Mr. ("M also Ra“ [m (I‘ll-ll: 21“,“th WtLdmfi to (17! unit whim luditot Wait-rim ' , l h . , h' , b‘ , _ u get the bureaucracy, theless foiirtownships would be A . me t all yo 3. t“; I “I, t; N 91‘ N g , mem‘ am ‘ at m0“ citi7i‘ns as? lag” worms ‘ (7 responsive it becomes " dominated hvurban votes make change lltats up to marlin: 7 ‘1 ”"121 14‘) ml m C ”"7 “mm"w and keeping my" robs VON“ engaging I“ By his analssts a sin iller We disagree t Hui thinks our politicians and we , ' on r it t ' . { . t ~ ~ ,_ “ml/It‘ll I ling gun ”1."?an h ""391“, lel to the ( roni biireaut‘ran‘ therefore there needs to he a more encourage them to Sl‘rlllll“l\ : ["1 ”51:12“ : n , "I ”n W ‘ t A“ r (7” “mm“: I‘ll? Virgh: 31:21:) ( at tn ”(7311”)“ should be more responsive equitable balance of votes ”"1“”?le information I it Mummy. .. ,.; , . 2 _, > , ., _ ‘ mug: lull nimr ”minim uldrrss (,(tthm hutS It:)l‘('r(wh:wKitfhen( r is i321“; push the and hp should “7km"? " around 'hflmmnl table thatt H“ ' “7'3",“ ”ml! ‘1 I j 7 l u H A l w ( 7 '7 7 ' ' ' ‘ ~ .. we think re iresentation ~ owrthel‘?N ' "WWW“ ma lclt‘phttnt mimhrr \Mrrsw ml WM?“ There i“ also concern about how open and reduttion ofthi duplitation ‘ t . by W‘ N ‘ 1 1m res "WWW “”"lh‘" i"? “T” ”n" l‘" ‘ , t t. .. l l rampant in our current eight population is an outdated ' a ”m n ‘g" ‘ \(‘thltillttjm 5:"th ““1 may” r: transparent thp prrx ms I?" argiiipg its missing t ie most governments model and we have suggest (1mm throughout ”w WW)” N he. t .‘HYK‘ “I not mi ‘ ‘ , ~ y , - ‘ ‘ . ‘ 7 Ln!“ [law mum "\M up" In My! rim "In???“l‘dnltll1dlltn(1l ‘7 a?" llus ”HMO" will afiett And r«10.000 residents ed a new model which is tort ad ”lit " P0" on t" ‘ ttmw Ht mm ans tunttll’mltnn it” ' "l ' '( It‘ll: ‘ l'" (7 ll _ FmWh ‘ l | 1 . t (“we not make us a ”mega ltK‘Usl‘d on communities wwwfindingalx‘tterwax (a ”7"“ " W“ “WW“ ”m" "‘3‘ (”m m 0 "I” on my” 3 Is I WW a re ut ante o titv" ”we are to fear mega ()iir preferred option is a "Wt” “WW mm m“ t hr :murmmtlh: lltl’lt'l ‘ I: 2:: 11“" l" lh“ DUN“ haw a “V f l l 1 , f» l i no; status. we have a long single city with a rount‘il of report thl“ or "mall WW l it . mar t rt . <er limit believe so strongly in re orm to ( a re i rent um ‘ . _ \l . t6 hers u R a ma 1” “f mamr and ward touncillor ‘ it». mom Ir t ,. a, m null or deln let ”1“ ‘l7ll7PnSUfVl/atf‘l’ltm havetheir sav was to go ega (its is a mem ; i y t , tit-ti in “wow t‘mitmttr :‘w ‘ » defined lrythellnited whith Nolthe councillors tolell them so i (“mfm' :' 91mm” 3o WWW” - , .1 t a: gut-WW“? ,~ Nationsasa metropolitan would represent urban areas ‘ H t a . ,» _ I“. “a. .., so . ‘ $3.3 W 7 ' y-7. ,‘ r ‘ ' ' 7 ’J::«-._ fa area wrthatotalpopulation andtheotherleouldbe "' H7779; 7,;$,;-.¢_;;.; '. w r «o ,. - s ital-ӣ5 of more than It) million pen from rural communities, , It"! l1hlfi!’n‘itflflvlnf i M £2, 7/5 7'7-' 77’“: 7 7 7 " " ‘3 ‘ ,3 pie prtmding almost equal rep l'th & (road Innuly Funeral a ‘W “A in“ ,7~.7°,7§7:~v"‘7~r1’"«";’ r 7 Mr (irow states that a resentation. V Home U? U nfirrmpr 7" *3” “’3" ' v new single municipality Finally. the 200 plus vol “MPH"! t‘thi't‘ntml‘tllm and ‘7 *3 [M MI W ' - t would be a threat to our rural unteers of(lB(i take excep I’mttflfl llm‘fm Rem" ‘ \/ «inimitamtnmiem . ~ , countryside. That is not true tion to Mr (tows statement frowniment