The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

i . WATERUD um 'Wednelhy. May Mb, 2007 'M-meu-mmmmnm twirutm '" Gil-H W - gunm- N-In may? maul-gm 'wrt-una-ot.?.?)", mam-1 M t--rs-er-sm-ersNmahor'be he." " MN, "r-rc-ues an: " - mam la. WWENMWImmMWu-mmnme "he mmtwt*raes-t-ea'r.t-a -ratter.rtoC"aremerMrra0tsumiM0rr' in 03106me mwnn w - n I wanna: mom“ or Nail. M ”wows ' mswmrvmu n Kainliellmltrrtto,tmee www.poolheaven.ca Oh? Source. Every pool. Meters will be checked regularly to ensure accuracy, says regional official Whom”! bracket. The agency repaired the meter's housing and the meter was fully recalibrated on April 19. With the change, the region also did a historical analysis of the waste-water flow which sug- gested that the Waterloo num- bers were overestimated by 40 per cent from October 2006 to hprfVoo1 What that means is that local water users will immediately see savings in the proposed mid-year waste-water rate, which city council reviewed Monday night. Instead of a waste-water rate of $1.26 per cubic metre, it was changed to a rate of $1.01 per cubic metre for a savings of 25 cents. "This is very good news," said Garibaldi. "Now we're not out trying to tind the source of this waste water. "There m the potential that this was going to be very diffi- cult to rand. It was not some- thing we were looking forward to because it seemed to be elude ing us." Hometown whmiiNmiiihNttaE Hometown News for an Awesome It also saved some potential- ly expensive repair and excava- tion work to solve the problem. The city had only undergone a visual inspection up to that point, and faced a much more intrusive program to find the problem. "it was much better to have found that the problem was a malfunction than it was to find it was a technical problem," said Garibaldi. "Had it been a real technical problem no one knows how much it would have cost to tix" The region has since correct- ed the problem and is initiating a program to make sure the mistake doesn't happen again, said Nancy Kadousek. the region's director of water servic- es. "lt was a type of failure that was difficult to determine," she Both flow meters will be [calibrated in May to confirm their proper perfttrmancr. -." In'adaizibn, the region will add another thrw meter at the Waterloo waste-water treatment "Now we're not out trying to Jind the source of this waste water. " City Wamloo facility to ensure the perform- ance and accuracy of the exist- ing meters. "We knew the flows had increased and we were really working in a co-ordinated effort with the city, with ourselves and with the operator to try and determine the problem and mitigate it," said Kadousek. That credit could cost the region upwards of $1 million as it reimburses the lower munici- pality, but ism going to signifi- cantly affect the regional budg- et. The region is also in negotia- tions with the city to come up with a credit for the almost half year of erroneous readings While that's good news for Waterloo water users, they will still face an increase in their mid-year and waste-water rate adjustments due to lower water sales. an increase in regional wholesale water rates and high- er budgeted waste-water flows beyond the earlier miscalcula- Pauling a Mal vote, the pro- posed changes will add $48.63 to the average water bill. That means the average water bill in Waterloo will go from $487 to $535.35 this year. That's still significantly lower than the bills that Kitchener and Cambridge water users will face this year. The annual water bill for Kitchener users will be $587.41 this year, while Cambridge users willpay $552.16.