Waterloo Public Library Digital Collections

Waterloo Chronicle (Waterloo, On1868), 27 Oct 2004, p. 10

The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

Ce. WKTERU )0 CHRONICLE _ E [ 279 Weber 5L, North. Suile 20 v} Waterioo,thuario N2l Mltt l I l llw\\.1lu|luul mum-la- prublhhml I mun Wednewtas In. the human hump, mun} tn l m S1toatiroup ‘Im " “mailman ol Imam: t In]! 1fre l .nuk-Iu "rrrtisrrario lsprulrlk‘d In vopsrogru and "I.“ he Used ottls tot “ prnun.“ mm nuunu-nml Purpose, ‘ MI otltcr ughts an turn-rd and uunmrn'mluwlspmhlmlvd lu make uw ol thc, unusual \uu ulusl " llhl nhmm [he [lt'llllhslon ot tut. owner oi the l upwlghl tomrialevwutvrloorttrtuuvte ca hportsez'wurvrloochronivit' ca sale,tiwaterloochrornrleca corttpusuea'waterltuscitromcltuus 'ru “mummy Inn-ml rt' um. um.- h I" rs In the I.luv-~ Iues A" oirl I». \mlnmiwn'llur‘l' “up” .n.| Mun“ nulrhn .ummh w w-H‘w‘! um "' . "V ' 'o umgnwl u-In rs w" n.» pnMMu-II \ulm-leuns m.“ hr .vlllml In: lt-ngvln sillill‘Jsl in hn-I Ingmnxh m mummy-I v-VIII'I mun-ah “IV-mmml In tht, "li'llhl r! and m , rprm! lm lulhlu Atrsm n-nmlm vnlh Ih: author hnr "Ir puhlnhn and m In nwa In.“ [rm-k rvpnulu: I Vhru "In"!!! '4retrom4 mulhmlnnm nun markup Adan-xx ". 'f‘nh-hc-v " N flrut .‘ll Watrtho N " tr'.' Phorte an» 2am Jan Hm) ‘HHS Che new". at uur rulummals are ”er uwn and do nut uranium represent thou-01 mu upwspapvr In.“ Mr; __. Crl 'Lhtus ( LI: Aid, Huh " ru~l hm I “nanny “emu-[your Group Publisher Group Sula I3igrctort Austin! Pllhlhhu um ial Protects sper I-l Proper" Mgr v.21 mg". 0.23 Jinn lull. If!) My 2ln l "ouon mm: an...“ and mm Wm! M I 1rtreemem Number hlu’nning Sale. I u 222 Rel-ll Sale: Within; Mun-get. ha. 230 Salts. Ext. 22: Indrea Baum Bob y rhanac Editor, Ext. 2t5 Spam mm. Ext.22§ www wotcrloochronwle Cd I..-m “amu- i.surucrrruulhiauduid \rndl Numher Letters Policy pi's.N D8T2-34 lt) 400504211 Mulm-I.‘ .m Ill.|l|v-l\ I I omprrsing "orrmat V" ' m The article I wrote sim- ply asks the question "ls it time to review the gover- nance of school boards?" The question posed I believe deserves due con- sideration. The evidence is over- whelming; there is a litany of reasons to initiate a review. What IN 1 ltuulv unsung nu lmaulx 1s a (Inn-ru- (I'l]\\ 'U'l mm 111 the I ttrrtttHHtItv [Ins l mild "asilx ho .uldn-xsml In an :Iplmnmm'm mm mm Pan-ms. \lmlvms and lnxpavt-Is alrkc t-xpvn " gnu! dcal mun- thar, lluw are l turrutrlv rm owing l I nnnnmmn an aim Minn grwrrnum " nught 1le! rvu-al thc tlmngm nt‘mll'll In m hwu- that um u'ss Mr. Moffitt is speaking as a union rep when he suggests a "wedge" has been driven between "teacher representatives" and the parents. Effective communication at the school level should be between teachers. parents. students and principals. Most teachers are happy with the access to parents and students. Increasing the involvement of trustees. boards of education, and federation representatives at the school level would serve no useful purpose. In com versations with many teachers. I haven't heard of any "wedge" or block; real or imagined. that discour- --_--_--_--T ages communication. Perhaps such a review will determine the present model is working fine. However. it may also indi- cate the present system is inadequate and change is necessary The authority of hoards has been significantly reduced. They now play a relatively small role in the delivery of education and education policy. Too often trustees attempt In justify their existence by continually interfering in the day-to-day business of the lmard. Cort1murucatiton with parenlx and students seems to he the. major COltuerr1 trf at least one [nun-v responding lu the article. Given the latest t-onsiuin1s the pulllir hmml has put on ck-lvgmiuns coming In appeal lu-Inrr [In-m. this would apps-m 10 he u mum pun" In 1lw Pust, Inuil hmmk n! vduruunn negminu-d rnllz-q'nw .Ign-x-nwmx (Inn-11h, with lnml bargaining Imih Ihu, Van " may" tvsporv,ilriliry as purl ot thrir hum-(whip Ioday mix is nu lung” th" mm While “withing twirmunnx cuvnumgv Hum-vs In light tor lmul bargaining. thev Ilu-mwlu-s [llnl that [calmn- snhihly mm In the, prm-im iul "'preuuttative m all m'gmiulmnx A rvvised gnu-“lam? mom-l could sm- the gov ('rnmrm .'I\\llnl(‘ tlw nvgnualiun pmu'ss irrtrviruml ly Sun " minding I (mu-s irom Ours-us Park. as do thc rcgulariorv, surh a I hung" wnuld streamline the pmnwx lists argument oi regional diftvreru m IN "f 1 Innw a min! rm? llmvvu'r xm h (Influx-m m t tuilet h1- mlu-n mm tru1sHh'rurittririsprir1oftlw nun-w Parrmx and \Iudvnh am t murmur-d uhnm .n c rm and ("1.11le at "du, aittttuFtrrorttutitu", Tihclhc, Ilmw nppmllmlm-s un- lul lllldll'l' In IIIIKII‘I’S, :IllpnInH-d "'prr""u1iittives. Ol smm- min-1 hum IN nu ovopirottul Hrne ”14:"lele have WP heard hoards of Him}? mm 1 mnplam they 1 an nnlv nogolinll- with what Ilwv hm? lll'i'l] gin-n In; the pmvinrt'? um murmuugml by lite Henry of mspnnbes In my Iron-m column. More Lllulngm- is important when tt aunts lo education. Ihat includes dialuglw lmm all gunmen rhat being said, I am " little disappointed in the tone of the response by Mr. Moftitt in his reference ll) the intentions of the Assembly of School Conn» cils, "Seized control". This statement is a little harsh iand paranoid) to say the least. Review may show change is needed _ JOHN HENDRY VI fi' WP 01 NT Ynu (mild gm ml of llwln misilv With muylw a mm)” to malt h Looking for Villains: Ynu (an hm thut (ul'urgr Duhyuh Will ln- Ort thc hot soul for this "rtdtwrrlotw m, shots mm; Illa! thc gm c-rmm'm order has, hit a had spur [I'll hu- inn-n-xung In we haw ltr sprir1klc llw hlamv on Iraq nmlrfm lurk In! the short ago of the pmn snpprr-xsurx It'll Innimhlv nun nIIl the Duhynll warned tutidetltituvd l'vnmgnn lug wltccis about the faulty shots rm thc lmsns that tluw wvn- " thstilluuon of halt llll'lll and In”! salu- Theh he looked down and waiting for him on the ground to make a catch was an outfiekier fer tre glue lays. Maybe I'm among the few Canadians who can't figure how the Americans got themselves buifuloed into buying the faulty slum. from a company which wax making an inferior prudurl. The Ameri, um, h\' unnmsL hnu' t"rosssctl 1hr hridgtw in dnvmpls In hog, hormw or steal " shot, Yum um hm that mum (lump diuns will try the shot this yea! now that is olrviouslv in demand, thu um bet that the pills will maybe tw hotter than a new lzlvis Preslev n-t'nrd But that will still Int-an plrnr SA ty left "Ver by the vnd of the iii shot whvdulu Now it Ilu. shots _ ranw with an mum garnish pm vidvd I“; lim Harlan or \mm- an: h. 'rd hr " hrm-It' I wonder how they drafted the entry fornf. Could he it was the man who dreamed that he'd jumped from a plane. pulled his parachute rip cord, and the chute didritopen. A Needle in Time: Gosh, we're talking about sending surplus flu shots to the Unit- ed States. That should mark us as good folks. nu doubt, I'hvrv's a particular lou/vel-rot In Imtario win-n- Ihvrck, nu ( hul'gr In: the shots, htill, lob m lrrlks 1 here we”) to n-guld flu-m in ONCI momma-(l, aterloo got a nice little mention as Wiii third most livable spot of under 300,000 people in world. That was in an international contest endorsed by the United Nations no less. Will Bo-Sox break the myth? Nun-IV vnu mall/v that the In)“ Hod News SAN I JY BAI RD It was on the new Perimeter institute fur Theoretical Physics building, had mistake-free spy-detection? Take the run by pgplpingd passeryrr)ets on 9-11, Point ofView: Do you think Waterloo is a pretty kind of place? How would you like to see it described as a "city of exceeding ugliness"? The heading. which dos-(Tums Waterloo as "a city of exceeding ugliness". is the only quote in the story which could he describvd as anti-Waterloo, The rest is a dewrip1ion and analysis at [he Perimeter Institute for l'ht'nn-lit‘nl Physics. Its "wood. fire, murmu- j and glass are lining clrnwms" inr its building", 1hr smry suiri. lit-Id. hm 11n- Yankee, an- thc iii-um tram. I‘hvv lust wvrvrit alrle to pmw II In a arm-n gmm- series, I only Impt- that Bostoo Huh tts fut vrnr 1'10"ng with " Warm Series c lmrnpinnshlp /utd "thiuttr' In hulv tht. mvlh ulmul Hu- Halu- and he, sak- m Ire, rork llw hm! \mm C m. m1hr nngun ot thc stun n thut ll wax Inn-”IN! ltt' a \punx writer lost for sums-[hung In wtm- nn an oil day dnnng Ilw writ-s Sn, tisst adv hv dc, "dc. the, Mun was n-pt-nu-(l w-zlr In; “an " Huxlun wmx llw World 'scrtes. the myth should ht- I'xplmlrd fur guild And thc “Im- Jaw, In.“ wmd up In tirst plat " mm and llwn It éo-uld level a- couplt: ofhuge towers. Or is tttatpvhatheppened? - That's how it was pictured in a major story in the Review section of the Toronto Globe and Mail of Last Wednesday. Am I complaining that the story was inaccurate? Heavens. no. It's a beautiful piece. I guess. It's just not something I can pass judgment on, Foul Balls: I wouldnt try to analyze the Boston vit-tow mm the New York Yank-m any mum than I'd put the Yanks on the griddle (wt-I Ilwir nun~wln (Wm ttw ('nltminls .lwny hark when. Hwy didn1 show n un thas It's an lllH'rt'sling “my: I wouldn‘t try and pm‘w it, any- mnn- than I'd Irv to drum nlw the l't-rinn-Ivr'x wnrls. [I'd lu- " Hit Mr Irying In tig- tire nul the \It'phvn Harper pusimm nu just ahrsut vvs’ry thing

Powered by / Alimenté par VITA Toolkit
Privacy Policy