The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

Elli! ative impacting Hm WNW “a the? they are real." tton-prMt project» had no overall negative influertee on up my. ty values of neighbwing m. Ly." concluded the M by Ekos Research Associates 6f Ottawa. "The ruidings sum that neg- Sunburn of Not In Mr M. yard (NMY) and?” harm: arguments against outing no... prtotit housing in your backyu-d may fall on defeat. A pmvineially finamed study has found then is no "idem: t t non-Mt bum tMtmtttr a decrease in value among my. rounding residential Men. Pte? M: Tte'enllr that Non-profit j housing doesn’t reduce prope_rty value, study Elms sidied S, impact of 51 .WATERuto my, “Home: 13300. A showed no noticeable Menace in prices between the two groups. The study thm the Ontario Ministry of Housing was distri buted Monday to Waterloo city council members. “It's never 1,'tt','g,',g,r,t, it does (reduce property v use) and now it's ”can it trg,',', said We. terloo Inning wisdom Tom Slomke later. The study puts tton-profit hous. "new - anon.itlat' aairi; Mt. and compared them with than“ comparable ehutarin a nearby am: with no similar do. "/g,t',',t,t of Milt 600 es, 00m. p_leted_between 1tlAtl 1988 Wt homing development. qt "rim types and sin. in North Bar, Ottawa and Metropol- itan Tm. The molt mined aetual " 'mgwietreaeluaterorholG, iteshrde uiiA, i",'%iiii"aii'l ' I) " m no to the permption by 'Pighltoring I homeowner: that Ind: a 'rer8eet I would create advent: meets on may values. This View in expressed at almost all public meetings for Toning bylaw amendments and minor var- "Oe Ministry of Housing is dependittgonthe nott-prMt ”c. ttttCarina/isa/it affordable housing for meidmtta ofloyaMmodmaiGGiTiiiii Province," noted the "roet to aryyilitrNornke ieet.toyrr-ootipgwith - ItAomenitheditG'iiGriiT I el1!1eivelitirtiGitairi.