The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

'sarGiiG, -iaGriaraua - ii. BIN“ GiiiiuiiiG', , new". I Mhemhtte'st.-theraitaratniezemrtivee-tttqe i -rtttantkatstol-s%rtttismatorev-ti-dt. t-ther$-rsta-saadueetr-a- _-.-.-- " -tmsedeihqe%deratedariththethiret, inus to get a picture of what the Ilingo“ will look like in 25 years, and th that in mind they're preparing broad set of policies which region- g F eet-on-the-g round , approach to new Region Policy Plan srrir-tortas,ttterraratli - I has way any. . In It isn’t hr the planners and =ie,'r, Involved In rewriting the of Windows otneiat Policy Plan. They’ve dug out their crystal pig reunion for St. Jerome's College 5 The out 2.“ alumni of the University of St. Jam’s 4Nhtre I2. w,..._.... pe F- ' a, was at an year's l: A report prepared by city staff 1nttritnited this increase to recent 3m awards against municipal- 5mm. which has led some compa- aties to discontinue insuring mu- ~nicioal liability. Recent court awards against municipalities have pushed up the cost of Waterloo's liability insurance by more than 80 per cent. and convinced aldermen to increase its coverage by $3 mil- Council agreed Monday to con- tinue its policy with Frank Cowan Co. Ltd.. at a cost of $120, $342, $51,342 more than the $69,000 included in the 1985 budget. As well they agreed to purchase an additional $3 million in prime coverage, at a cost of 83.636. bringing the city's total liability insurance to $8 million. ' City ups liability insurance Wyn glut way Sam. 1. tsat " Mommam'ocmmmmwmymmmmwm1mm. my.“ “Mammalian cant-tren-irate-theh-e. Waterloo M’s Direct. 01 PM m Vinny explain-d that the plan Is I “nan-wide. tmtadt-dsetofpettieies"m6ielt retrteinteemtrrthiastrtt_om_1nrd- such issues as waste disposal, sew- age treatment. environmental pro tectial and water supply. “It presents policies relating to development and the management of regional services...for the average citizen it means to a large extent that the policies in the regional plan determine how munic- ipalities respond to problems facing the indiva as a property owner. as a resident. as a eommuter," Watty said. "The end product is an attempt to reflect the changing economic and social conditions. and how those changes will affect the region to morrow." Seems important, yes, hut it is also bureaucratic, "once-removed and theoretical" said Waterloo councillor Brian Turnbull. head of the region's planning eommittee, and because of this, he's not really surprised that the review hasn't sparked much interest from the public. In fact, Turnbull noted, only seven Kitchener-Waterloo residents even showed up at last week's public hearing held by the Region to hear response to the draft report of the new official plan review. "Although it does affect the ordi- nary person in some specific. in many cases it doesn't impact on their backyard so there's not much interest," said Tumbull. "I find planning extremely interesting. but I don't blame people for not taking an interest...“ can be pretty dull." Tumbull said that although there will be a number of similarities in the specifics of the old and new official plans, the new document that emerges from the review process will be vastly different in the approach it takes. Written in 1976. the original ofrr cial policies plan included "as many policies as possible, relating to social issues and economic issues, even if there was no Jurisdiction to tackle those issues," he explained. The new plan, he stressed, has taken a "feet-on-the ground approach," and will primarily address physical development. Thus, Tumbull said, "we've cut out a lot of stun." As well. he said, the revised plan will recognize the maturity of local governments to "deal with their own problems," in a way not acknowledged before. 'statttMttqtttemt'siea1-ttsistatrttrt-s6t-tes huartittot8te-att.heh-er-rttliaherbee 1rttheCehtr'a-traaqtemadrattmMta-ta_rittbe tunable. tArr'tHrrr-atiqntu:8trat-iwttla.tttesrhrthe eeetteatimttret-.iuoi-ietttttr.-iir-ttng mummmnwmhmu.0dhp -tdeatt all former chukka In“ In M. C.R.,%t"ethe-ttttta-tist. lhe m “I "tgttgtt we I. the W5 -eimoritd_rmr-a1s"igMtgtttBtherelqtd The following lists the individual allocation to each of the 29 particupating member agencies. All Ind-m "Y" mun makmummmummmouuhm is... BigBeeherAa-eiati-tEi_r-mteeuo BtttSisgerse"ige*e-rWagee%ramdArea mam-um ”mac...“ Mashhad!“ Ca_eVlthAa-eiati.ettWaae+.Bqt'-t) Camdiaii-al1mtit-$.rthrBtind mummy“: It“! The Board of Directors of the Kitchener-Wa- terloo and Area United Way announces ap- proved allocations to its 29 participating mem- ber agencies for was totalling $1,440,735. This represents a 9.2% increase over the 1985 allocations of $1,3i8,401. "one: show committee. Ann Miller (centre), wife of Ontario Premier Frank Miller, was on hand for the opening of the K-W Garden Club‘s Nature Designs with Artist's Lines show at the t9trthemtrr-watertefrt Gallery. With Miller is Nina Watkiss (left), chairperson at the United Way allocations End-rm may mum over I. damn. their mummnnmdncu.uma. who and wily not In. A free t-tteette and tter-a-tttttet-UM. Aatdftt-rsri-e%dea"aaattr"-etrtg tgt-ttttit-MCC-nt-i-tti-hen-et Mthmwgbmfiea‘w"pfiem .W t-ggtt 'eheaaltert 't'grg"tt.ttg't'l'gtlytgt"e'2'ttttMft the'mrrMtrtgatttt.3-e'sOtrti--.iu-arri- Icahn-0:- “mammary-the and Auto: place lqMatdy 'tttio-tgtg pm. This n.5- Caulk Social Services Cam-k You": Orv-tuna: Calamity blur-min (in!!! (LII-In Cancun: Mm) Girl Guides at Canada (Camp WI Hunt " My Itttertaith Pastoral (bundling (In!!! John “and Society K-W atrrtseltkriR Services " Services kr the Physically Disabled Kitchener YWCA. lulu: Scion-sis Society Ontario lamb of Dine: Ray at a»: (Hope but) The 8|th Amy 'tattirese'eeutisree"trasshta-'rrm.N-utaleratrte"teeet St, him Ant-lam vm was” (VON) mm Family "Y" tt A00,735 115,-) I'M- urns