The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

Of course, that won‘t solve the overâ€"all problem. With the rising cost of operating a private motor vehicle, and the increasing congestion in downtown. areas, public transit must be considered an important and viable alternative. The City has already agreed to study the transit problem in northeast Waterloo, but perhaps they should undertake an overâ€"all study. Waterioo Chronicle office is located on 2nd floor of the 0. W Sports building Waterioo Square Parking on King Street or in Waterioo Square. Open M FEnday 9:00 a.m to 5.00 p m Alderman Walter McLean raised another interesting problem. A full bus is a very rare sight in Waterloo. he said. Mayor Carroll added that a study done by Kitchener Transit showed that one out of 10 Waterloo residents rides the bus. Why not reduce bus service in an area where it‘s not being used, and provide the people in northeast Waterloo with the bus service they want so badly. But in order for public transit to be viable, it must be at least moderately efficient. Since ours is not, some in depth research is obviously called for. Other cities have efficient transit systems. It may be exâ€" pensive at first. but eventually it will be necessary. Whaâ€" tever the City decides to do about the problem in general residents in the northeast section deserve public transit. It‘s the responsibility of the City to provide essential services, especially when the residents in question are paying taxes. Taxes, after all. should entitle the resident to something besides headaches. Perhaps it‘s time the City undertook a complete study and revitalization of our public transit system. According to Mayor Marjorie Carroll, we‘re spending $675,000 on Waâ€" terloo‘s share of Kitchener Transit‘s bill. It seems the transit system in this city is a mess mildly. Page 6 â€" Waterloo Chronicle, Wednesday, March 21, 1979 By Howard Elliott The City of Waterloo has a problem with buses One group of residents in the northeast end o wants buses, but are having trouble getting the most parts of the city, buses are near empty m time. Letters to the editor of the Waterloo Chronicle must be signed with the writer‘s name in order to be pubâ€" lished. The name will be published with the letter The writer should also include his or her address and teleâ€" phone number Normallyv. a letter signed with a pseuâ€" donym will not be published The editor has the right to edit letters for grammar and spelling and to withhold letters which may be deemed defamatory. contemptuous or of questionable taste _ . The Chronicle welcomes letters to the editor on any subject Letters should be sent to: The Editor. Waâ€" terloo Chronicle. 92 King St S.. Waterloo The Waterloo Chronicle did not publish its Letters to the Editor from Philip Bast dated May 31st. and June 7th. 1978 to embarrass its former editor, John Schultheiss The opinions expressed by Mr. Bast were hig own and do not reflect the views of the Chronicle: The Chronicle does not question Mr. Schultheiss‘s personal integrity or his qualifications as a jopurnalist Complete study in order Letters policy published every Wednesday by Fairway Press, a division of Kitchenerâ€"Waterioo Record Ltd., owner * 225 Fairway Rd. S., Kitchener, Ont. address correspondence to Waterioo office: 92 King St. South, Watérioo, Ont.,.telephone 886â€"2830 Retraction he northeast end of the city rouble getting them. But in are near empty most of the Publisher: Paut Winkler Editor: Terry James established 1854 Our back pages _ hZ 1 :%WM:N; % | @ ' 6 . c fl‘ Mlg + {Q\“ \ fl" ' “m.. ‘ \ wC \,( \ TE e ‘ s ) ( WERE MONITORING THE \ GRAND FOR FLOODING .ANY OTHER QUESTIONS ? / GR OTF Women had as much work to do as the men, as shown by the two ladies on the right. They‘re using an old style "cream separator"‘, which was operated by a hand crank. (Photos courtesy Ontario Department of Agriculture and Food.) Letters to the editor che@. +