E_ 32 ' ateriqo UNLAFIO, a»HBMEE EL ks + Vel. 100 Aurinmniprcetonticaicaetirtirene evnntacaiamcnatiietieiaeemetiige t e mt i«t‘, *3 ' h+ a= â€" â€" 5 Wl "€ ‘ j * o ‘ â€" . 1 8UuIsu8j . * gyi * i + a m ~ e , 'h. ' & * ho 7 . + â€" » > 7 ' â€" m S 4 E. a ‘ . ‘ ) wgs {i_"'vl,» o« hA _ * i * E. c .:1.'.*‘;'33 «o 49 t ‘,.ï¬ng man a chance to see ~#*" whab the suti looks like withâ€" out looking through windows. For Waterloo to stay on !‘__ stamdard tme.and have Kitchâ€" ~___ ener go ‘to daylight saving would in our opinion be the height of somthing or other. There are enough difficulties incurred now in doing busthess of any kind with the two cities. There seemes little point in _ Actuifiy there is much to be said for both sides of the arguâ€" ment, although probably pubâ€" lic opifiion will sway the doing in whatever direction is necesâ€" sary to please them. _ Storemen cannot ‘be blamed for not wanting to work the extra hours while factory workâ€" ers© are bugging their unions to ever . shorten:> their work week. â€" _ _ > WA > _â€"On the other hand, the pybâ€" lc have long Uemanded serâ€" vice. with: their purchases and it ja %eenuh:“ request £:; ages. of thosé in Waterloo. ~~ No goubt a number of those Torlged in these quarters have been used to something better in the way of accomodattons, but after all if they get themâ€" selves in prediciments where scell confinement is necessary, they can hardly expect to be too choosy. â€" WE CAN‘T SEE what all the fuss is nbou{ concerning Waterloo police celis. They may not be the best in the world but they are a far cry from beâ€" ing the worst. In fact cells in Kitchener lack several advantâ€" Probably a coat ofâ€"paint would brighten the appearancé of these places of confinement, but the installation of feather or other luxuries ~ hardly apâ€" pears necessary. There is little or nothing wrong with Waterloo police cells that couldn‘t be remedied for about ten bunks. Thats more than can be said of some other places. C NOW DON‘T TELL US that old "moth eaten question ‘of daylight saving time is again going to oecupy the efforts of eouncil. / ce _â€"Why isn‘t DST a good idea? It certainly gives the average working man a chance to see «Continued on Page 3) J.H.:S. BY â€" K.. V â€" School worst hit Mr. Harold B. Soanes, Genâ€" .ul lgnmr, â€' r°fl’“ m-, Waterloo, has been appointt trustee in the west ward eo-xl:hto the term of Rev. E. F. Bishop, resigned, terminatâ€" CcOUNCIL ‘BRIEFS Wateripe Ontario, Thursday, March 1, 1956 _ * reme:x wuu nE . 67 TCBE i;ï¬;tu. .b.i.â€"--.&;,’ Pomsroy & losing battle .a blaze nmmmm mWeh&ewwm( of the )â€Muum-wm.m trucks from Kitchener, Waterloo been appointed the alternate w cheques, pending "the ab _of the treasurer. A a1 .grena rt N pramal on se t _ * se* fos discusk their 1956 budget. . ; : d‘&% is going ub, as you are quite es leg * l “'gg'}m f needed", hï¬ out : 56 budget we have made allowâ€" possibly f‘rlg }v; :i iz ' salaries Mr. Martin s#id a com» ate size & the Collegiato‘s wagâ€" nonâ€"specialist teacher ‘the salâ€" ary is $3,200 and for * inliset in his field. the ‘;.& is $3,400. T/ Mr. Martin said there are us very few teachers gndutthc'<\:_ 4 from schools that can equip y gollegiates with the nécessary cast staff. He also mentioned ï¬z Â¥1/. wl teachers ‘can be acquired ~if m l i salaries "stay close. to withim‘ . ~ +. $100 of other schools."_ /+ w «sMIBFLC m . VOtH J « .' sp :. beirar in thair 1966 B o e es in the 1956 budget for the achool board was $5,180 for the library. was explained that such an inâ€" crease was due to the erection of the new collegiate. The schoolâ€" inspectors. think. more able to students. The new school will have a new library. and as such, the librarian, Mr. Thompson, will start from "seratch". â€" Many ~new .‘ books will be purchased. The same explanation sufâ€" ficed the incresase in the metal and wood shop ~necessities in the technical portion of the school. â€" ~ T So NK In 1955 the City of Water= loo made & z?nt to the colâ€" legiate of $82,576.98, whereas this year the city is being aske ed for $111,004.64. This reâ€" presents ':; ln:’rmo of 1.38% mills. Kitchener‘s. contribution in 55 was $328,227.%$2 and this fyear the school board is asking them to pay a total ?!‘ $416â€" 618.04. ® car The mill rate in regard to theit grant cannot. be evaluat» ed dut to the reâ€"assessment program carried out in Kitehs as s oss ment commissioner, whose service were invaluable in the gelection. , A committee will be appointâ€" .ed from the Kâ€"W Collegiatos gq; : :@ ';“vfum tm m 6 a “ï¬:ï¬kflfuï¬n ) of the wonderful site that was chosen for the crection of the new sthool and gave schools are in the samé Te mende Wo. 9 xX kln a 65 +4