County of Brant Public Library Digital Collections

Correspondence Relating to Bondholders of B. Bell & Son Company, 1933, Page 4

The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

October " br« 0> H. &u$rheadf Brewster & Heydt I)t Oat** Deo' i Kalrixead: ff.fi. ~ I have from y 1 1 eraon tl, ial notice of the baBteuptcy of Cornell^ proof of defett etc* Litli Mr. Dowlinc and Mr.^ Cyrus (rrifritli both on the grow : teei it would be rather preauBptuoaa for ne to dictate just should be COMO. I feelt howeirerf that about the a hlng *0- can hope for out of this is to get our taxes paid out of the Cornell e, Amon^ the preferred < . ;:s 1 see that they haYe in the list one it en of ta:cen, D« ' * Ciller ^•146*37 ondf of courae, we do not know whether \ \ ::es on our property or not* I eu^gest that an inset! is ..id aggressive effort should "be made to haw the riOTt, . I j ^ur f Is located file a claim i . i I creditor • ?he stafeijant furnished by the austodlan yiYes no hint of assets whatever .;o Lh , is iMpossit:" . ; certain ii!iet!ier there will be assets euff leimt to pay more than claims and the expenses* • fe I of I I preferred claims would to cjne^stion, i*e* '-'* V;. ;.,;horp

Powered by / Alimenté par VITA Toolkit
Privacy Policy