This photo appears to be a standard studio pose. That would be confirmed by the bottom of the card. Out of sight would have been a back brace with head rest to help hold the subject still. The pamphlet would more likely have been just a prop supplied by the studio. These studios would often supply furs and weapons to also be used as props depending on the subject.
These studios were usually on the top floor with large skylight windows for natural lighting. I would place this photo around the mid 1870s although it could be earlier. Even with the technology then in use, the subject would have to sit still for 20 or 30 seconds.
Could he have brought the pamphlet? Sure. But much more likely it was supplied by thhe studio.
Comments may be edited for appropriate language and HTML.
All fields are required.
Not all comments will be posted.
Your email address will be stored so that we may contact you again about your comment, but will not be displayed to the public, or otherwise shared, without your permission.
Comments will not be posted until they have been reviewed.
To make a a simple paragraph break, simply hit [Enter] twice
This service is sponsored by Jeff Knoll, Local & Regional Councillor for Oakville Ward 5 – Town of Oakville/Regional Municipality of Halton
RE: photo pamphlet
This photo appears to be a standard studio pose. That would be confirmed by the bottom of the card. Out of sight would have been a back brace with head rest to help hold the subject still. The pamphlet would more likely have been just a prop supplied by the studio. These studios would often supply furs and weapons to also be used as props depending on the subject.
These studios were usually on the top floor with large skylight windows for natural lighting. I would place this photo around the mid 1870s although it could be earlier. Even with the technology then in use, the subject would have to sit still for 20 or 30 seconds.
Could he have brought the pamphlet? Sure. But much more likely it was supplied by thhe studio.