C. H. Little to R. F. Weidner, March 20, 1907
Carroll Herman Little, Correspondent
R. F. Weidner
, Recipient
Media Type
Item Type
Handwritten letter from Carroll Herman Little to Dr. R. F. Weidner, president of the Chicago Theological Lutheran Seminary, on March 20, 1907. Little describes his reading and continuing studies.
Carroll Herman Little (1872-1958) was a Lutheran pastor, and a professor and administrator at the Evangelical Lutheran Seminary of Canada (later Waterloo Lutheran Seminary; now Martin Luther University College) in Waterloo, Ontario.

Little was born in Hickory, North Carolina in 1872. He was the eldest of ten children born to Rev. Marcus Lafayette Little (1848-1891) and Candace Mary Almetta Herman (1848-1947). Marcus L. Little, a Lutheran pastor and educator, was killed in a train accident in Newton, North Carolina on February 16, 1891.

C. H. Little received his early education and work experience in North Carolina, graduating from Gaston College in 1889. From 1888-1891 Little worked as editor of a newspaper founded by his father in Dallas, North Carolina. He also taught in North Carolina schools. After his father’s death, Little entered Roanoke College in Virginia, graduating with a BA (Classics) in 1893. From 1897-1898 he was enrolled in post-graduate studies in the Classics Department at John Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland.

In 1901 Little graduated from Mount Airy Theological Seminary in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Following in his father’s footsteps, C. H. Little was ordained by the Ministerium of Pennsylvania on June 3, 1901. After ordination he accepted a call to the Nova Scotia Synod, serving as pastor in the New Germany parish from 1901-1909, and the Mahone Bay parish from 1909-1911. From 1911-1914 he was housefather of Bethany Orphans’ Home in Bridgewater, Nova Scotia. During this time he also served the Nova Scotia Synod as secretary (1904-1909), president (1911-1914) and editor of the Nova Scotia Lutheran (1907-1911). In 1914 Little was recognized with an honorary Doctor of Divinity from Lenoir Rhyne College in Hickory, North Carolina. Little left Nova Scotia in 1914 when he accepted a call to the St. Lawrence Parish in Morrisburg, Ontario.

In 1917 C. H. Little accepted a teaching position at the Evangelical Lutheran Seminary of Canada (now Waterloo Lutheran Seminary) in Waterloo, Ontario. He remained at the Seminary for the rest of his career, retiring in 1947. In addition to his responsibilities as professor, Little also held various administrative roles including acting President, 1918-1920, 1929-1931, and 1942-44; Bursar, 1918-1933; and Dean, 1920-1927. Little continued to pursue his own education through correspondence studies with the Chicago Lutheran Seminary, receiving the degrees of BD and STM in 1924, and an STD in 1928.

Publications authored by C. H. Little include New Testament handbook (1941); Lutheran confessional theology : a presentation of the doctrines of the Augsburg Confession and the Formula of concord (1943); and Explanation of the book of Revelation (1950). He was a long time contributor to the Canada Lutheran, and held editorial positions for the publication.

Carroll Herman Little married Edith Blanche “Bonnie” DeLong (1888-1974) on September 9, 1908 in Nova Scotia. They had ten children: Carolus DeLong, Herman Luther, Marion, Arthur Bernard, Robert Paul, Margaret Eileen, Ruth, Catharine, Florence, and John Frederick.

Carroll Herman Little died in Waterloo, Ontario on March 31, 1958.

-- Letter transcribed by Kelsey Grant in 2013.
Date of Original
March 20, 1907
Width: 13.6 cm
Height: 20.1 cm
Local identifier
Eastern Synod of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Canada fonds
Language of Item
Geographic Coverage
  • Nova Scotia, Canada
    Latitude: 44.55015 Longitude: -64.71547
Copyright Statement
Public domain: Copyright has expired according to Canadian law. No restrictions on use.
Recommended Citation
Correspondence from Carroll Herman Little to R. F. Weidner, 20 March 1907, S100, File 5.1.7, Eastern Synod of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Canada fonds, Wilfrid Laurier University Archives & Special Collections, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Reproduction Notes
S100 Disc8
Wilfrid Laurier University Library
Agency street/mail address:

75 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON Canada N2L 3C5

Full Text

New Germany, N.S.,

March 20, 1907.

Dear Dr. Weidner:

Your kind letter was received some days ago. Thanks for the suggestions contained in it. I have not yet begun Fairbairn’s Typology, but will do so as soon as I can get around to it. In the meanwhle I have not been idle, but have done considerable reading. I finished “Luther’s Primary Works”, Wace & Buchheim which I was reading when I wrote you last. I also read Bettex’s “Das Wunder” and “Moehler’s Symbolism”. The latter I had to fight at every step and I disfigured the book with exceptions, comments and criticisms till the margin of every page looked like a lawyer’s brief. But I found the exercise stimulating

(Page 2)

and enjoyable – excellent intellectual pugilism. It gave me a much clearer idea also of the Catholic view point and of how the came by their heresies. Though, of course, Moehler is a little out of date. If he had lived after the Vatican Council, he would doubtless have changed or modified some of his views. He writes in an irenical and rather amiable sort of way, and evidently would like to be just and fair. But he can’t altogether subdue his partisanship. It crops out especially in the charge which he brings against Luther and repeats ad nauseam, that he held the Flaccian heresy. And the strange thing about it is that while he testifies that Calvin used the same sort of expressions on this point he acquits him of the charge. During the reading of his views on the Church, I read through your little book on Ecclesiologia, which helped me greatly in the refutation. I note that Moehler defends the doctrine

(Page 3)

of Purgatory by appealing to tradition only and as a necessity to complete the peculiar Catholic doctrine of justification. One thing that surprised me was the frank admission that the Catholic Church did not agree with St. Augustine on original sin. I knew it didn’t, but I didn’t think Catholics would admit it. Moehler would also like to see the use of the cup made optional. His defense of its withdrawal is especially weak. The fundamental error throughout the whole book is, of course, the elevation of the Church above the Scriptures, thus setting up a false standard of truth. Luther’s description of faith in Introduction to Romans, he commends, but characterises it as in “The most amiable contradiction” to his theological system. The author's sense of proportion is somewhat questionable. He gives about 40 pages to a consideration of Emanuel Swedenborg, his visions and views – which is far beyond his importance. The object

(Page 4)

however seems to be to show by the testimony of Swedenborg’s angels that the Reformers generally failed to reach heaven. Luther will probably get there eventually, while Melanchthon is left in purgatory without prospect of release and Calvin is unceremoniously hurled into the pit. But to give a thorough criticism of Moehler’s book in a letter is out of the question. I will therefore let up on him for the present. Bettex’s little book is quite good and very suggestive. But he carries his point almost too far, virtually making miracles consist in our ignorance. I notice also that he is an advocate of creationism, which I do not consider reconcilable with the doctrine of original sin. I am still at work on Godet’s John, but am progressing slowly, finding time only for a few verses every day. One cannot but admire his reverent treatment even when one cannot agree with him. I am about half through the second volume. I am also con-

(Page 5)

tinuing the study of Zezschwitz’s Christenlibre, and have read down to the middle of the 2nd Article of the Creed. I was especially pleased with his treatment of the first article of the Creed and the constant connecting of it at all points with the view point of redemption. It is wonderfully clear and instructive in that particular. I note, however, that on the person of Christ, he is a little off as so many even of Lutheran theologians are. He makes the incarnation itself a part of the humiliation of Christ. But I find the greatest of help in this book. It is so full, thorough, clear and logical. I am also reading another book which I find quite helpful, especially as I got little along that line in the Seminary; and that is Robins’ “Ethics of the Christian Life”. Robins, I think is a Baptist and in many points I do not at all agree with him, but he furnishes plenty of food for thought.

(Page 6)

He is too subjective. For instance, he makes the divine law implanted in man’s nature as the standard. Of this even the Ten Commandments are only an outward and partial or fragmentary presentation. And this subjective law it was which Christ came to fulfil and not to destroy. In accordance with this view, the objectivity of the final judgement is [d?] and the same is made purely subjective. Christ in His humiliation has divested Himself of himself of His divine state and is consequently peaceable, the temptations of the two Adams being in every way perfectly parallel. The only difference is in the different results. And yet, strange to say, the author in considering Christ’s emotion as He wept over Jerusalem declares that He here “transcends His status as a mere man”.

The author also adopts the new Presbyterian dogma that all infants dying in infancy are saved. But he declares it is not logical to stop there

(Page 7)

and adds to the list practically all irresponsibles, thereby to all intents and purposes making “infancy” “idiocy”, “congenial insanity”, and “inherited abnormality”, saving means of grace. His application and interpretation of Scripture passages are also frequently at fault, and while he protests against it he cannot escape from a synergising or semi-plagiarising tendency. But I must bring my letter to a close. We have had an exceptionally cold winter, so everybody says. But I have not found it very trying. I rather enjoyed it. We had it so nice for the last week or so, we thought the rough weather was about over. But last night we had quite a snow storm and it is wild and squally to-day. With my kindest regards and very best wishes,

I am

Sincerely yours,

[signed] C.H. Little.

Powered by / Alimenté par VITA Toolkit

My favourites lets you save items you like, tag them and group them into collections for your own personal use. Viewing "My favourites" will open in a new tab. Login here or start a My favourites account.


C. H. Little to R. F. Weidner, March 20, 1907

Handwritten letter from Carroll Herman Little to Dr. R. F. Weidner, president of the Chicago Theological Lutheran Seminary, on March 20, 1907. Little describes his reading and continuing studies.