County of Brant Public Library Digital Collections

Letter from McMaster, Montgomery, Fleury and Co. to George H. Muirhead

:
Description
Media Type
Text
Item Type
Documents
Description
This is a letter from McMaster, Montgomery, Fleury and Co. law firm to George H. Muirhead of St. George, Ont., regarding his concerns that he had not been properly compensated.

The original document is held by the South Dumfries Historical Society.
Date of Original
30 October 1916
Subject(s)
Local identifier
2011SD152
Collection
South Dumfries Historical Society
Language of Item
English
Geographic Coverage
  • Ontario, Canada
    Latitude: 43.2501 Longitude: -80.24966
Copyright Statement
Public domain: Copyright has expired according to Canadian law. No restrictions on use.
Recommended Citation
Letter from McMaster, Montgomery, Fleury and Co. to George H. Muirhead, 1916. South Dumfries Historical Society, 1999.60.34E.
Terms of Use
The information and images provided are for personal research only and are not to be used for commercial purposes. Use of this information should include the credit "South Dumfries Historical Society."
Contact
South Dumfries Historical Society
Email:info@southdumfrieshistory.ca
Website:
Agency street/mail address:
36 Main St. South, P.O. Box 472
St. George, ON N0E 1N0
519-448-3265
Full Text

TELEGRAPHIC AND CABLE ADDRESS

"MONTGOMERY, TORONTO"

WESTERN UNION CODE

TELEPHONES MAIN 2103-MAIN 2104

CANADA LIFE BUILDING, 4A WEST Kl NG ST.

TORONTO, October 30th, 1916

George E. Muirhead, Esq.

Office of Master of Titles, Osgoode Hall

TORONTO Dear Mr.Muirhead

I don't agree with you that we have given

the bondholders nothing in return for their money. We have certainly put a lot of work on this matter. I have definitely found quite a few extracts from the corp. minute book that I

made before it was lost, which may be somewhat of a surprise to these directors who until they are safe now that the minute book is gone.

I have opposed a motion made by Watson & Company to dismiss the action for want of prosecution successfully as to that and have simply been pat on terms to give notice of trial within three weeks.

I have been unable to arrange with Mr*Britton Osier to produce his client, Dinnick, for examination pursuant to the old subpoena* He has not done it. They says Dinnick does not reply to his letters. I am therefore issuing' a new subpoena and appointment for our friend Mr. Dinnick and will have him personally served.

Yours truly

ACM.D

Powered by / Alimenté par VITA Toolkit
Privacy Policy